Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5408 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

My wife and I are beginners, and are just as confused as everyone else. I have been to the driving range a few times and have played a couple of games of golf. When it comes to buying equipment for sports, I am extremely picky; and eventually want to buy a very nice set if I stick to the game (my favorite driver so far is Taylormade Burner- http://www.taylormadegolf.com/products/drivers/burner-superfast-2.0-driver).

For now, we were thing of buying a beginners set we wont mind discarding for cheap next year. I have narrowed down to two sets available at our local club (which will let me try these out for a couple of times with an option of returning): Price Triax XV (http://www.princegolf.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath;=10&products;_id=72) and Orlimar Black Ice (http://www.orlimar.com/blackice.html).

Any thoughts?


Posted

I think you should just go for the nicer set and get fitted for your shaft.

If you are beginners and you aren't swinging hard, perhaps get a regular shaft.

At least when you need to change, all you change is just the shafts and you still keep the club heads.

New clubs = getting used to it and your swing may detoriate for a while.


Posted

Thanks for the reply, Sai-Jin.

I went to a local store, and although they didn't officially fit me, they told me that I need regular length and regular stiffness based on my swing speed. Both of these sets have regular graphite shafts; and I really cant tell the difference (prince has more clubs and is $30 more). I am going for  swing analysis/ lesson this weekend. Should I wait until then to buy?

Which of the two I mentioned do you think is nicer?


Posted

I use Taylormade Woods and Mizuno Muscle Back blades only.

They are some of the best in the market and lower handicappers like them I find.

But you should just go with the ones you like in terms of feel and visual. This will give you more confidence when you look at the club heads as well as how they feel

when on impact. Only you can decide that.

The fitting will be for your current swing to determine what shaft you need. Believe it or not... shaft is very important.

So get those lessons and swing analysis and try out different brand clubs and pick the club head you like and stick

the shaft recommended by the fitter.

As your swing gets better and more solid, then you can get fitted again for the shaft. But I would think maybe it'll be a long while

before you get a new shaft.


Posted

Don't go with a cheap beginner's set-get a nice used set of irons off ebay or globalgolf for approximately the same amount of money.  Tons of great clubs that cost top dollar 2, 5, 10 or 15 years ago, and you'll have no problem finding a set with regular flex shafts.  Look for stuff along the lines of Titleist 775s, PING Eye2s, PING Zing2s, PING ISIs, TaylorMade R7s, TM 300s, WilsonStaff Ci7s, Wilson Staff Ci9s, W/S Di9s, Mizuno MX-25s, Mizuno MX-200s, Callaway X-18s, X-20s, X-22s, Cobra SZ and many others.  Good luck.


Posted


Getting fitted for a iron shaft for a beginner is un-necessary.

Originally Posted by Sai-Jin

I use Taylormade Woods and Mizuno Muscle Back blades only.

They are some of the best in the market and lower handicappers like them I find.

But you should just go with the ones you like in terms of feel and visual. This will give you more confidence when you look at the club heads as well as how they feel

when on impact. Only you can decide that.

The fitting will be for your current swing to determine what shaft you need. Believe it or not... shaft is very important.

So get those lessons and swing analysis and try out different brand clubs and pick the club head you like and stick

the shaft recommended by the fitter.

As your swing gets better and more solid, then you can get fitted again for the shaft. But I would think maybe it'll be a long while

before you get a new shaft.




Posted

Aye Carramba! More confused now. But I get the point. Buy what feels good, and something my coach approves.

Finding used sets is harder than it sounds, tried Ebay- there's too many variables (shipping etc). Plus I find it hard to know if a brand from 2002 is as good as one today.


Posted

Here's the short answer-yes.  A brand (I think you mean model) from 2002 is as good as one from today.  I don't know what people think is magically happening with irons over the last few years that is making them so much better.  The basics of a cavity back iron are the same today as when the PING Eye2 was invented.  Yes, there have been incremental changes/improvements over the years, but you'd be hard pressed to find a more forgiving and great all around iron than the PING Zing2 from 1994-1996.  Callaway Big Berthas and X-12s-X24s are essentially the same club now as when they came out.

I'm not sure I understand how there are too many variables on ebay.  Sort what you're looking for by cost plus shipping, look at items from a respected seller.  And if for some reason you're still not comfortable, check globalgolf.

Originally Posted by gurdesh

Aye Carramba! More confused now. But I get the point. Buy what feels good, and something my coach approves.

Finding used sets is harder than it sounds, tried Ebay- there's too many variables (shipping etc). Plus I find it hard to know if a brand from 2002 is as good as one today.




Posted


Originally Posted by max power

Here's the short answer-yes.  A brand (I think you mean model) from 2002 is as good as one from today.  I don't know what people think is magically happening with irons over the last few years that is making them so much better.  The basics of a cavity back iron are the same today as when the PING Eye2 was invented.  Yes, there have been incremental changes/improvements over the years, but you'd be hard pressed to find a more forgiving and great all around iron than the PING Zing2 from 1994-1996.  Callaway Big Berthas and X-12s-X24s are essentially the same club now as when they came out.

I'm not sure I understand how there are too many variables on ebay.  Sort what you're looking for by cost plus shipping, look at items from a respected seller.  And if for some reason you're still not comfortable, check globalgolf.



There are too many variable on ebay for a new golfer. Don't search by brand and model. Try searching for "golf clubs". It's truly overwhelming.

I wouldn't normally suggest getting a cheaper box set, but since most people quit golf after seeing how hard and expensive it is, why waste so much money and time searching. Just pick up a set of Prince or whatever set an experienced golfer might think is a POS and go for it.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I guess you're right-I'm just thinking of everyone I know who bought a similar set, got even remotely interested in golf, and then was looking to sell or trade for some "real clubs" 3-9 months later.  There's nothing "wrong" with a starter set-they're perfectly functional.  But if you like golf at all you'll be looking to move up soon and the starter set will be worth next to nothing.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

There are too many variable on ebay for a new golfer. Don't search by brand and model. Try searching for "golf clubs". It's truly overwhelming.

I wouldn't normally suggest getting a cheaper box set, but since most people quit golf after seeing how hard and expensive it is, why waste so much money and time searching. Just pick up a set of Prince or whatever set an experienced golfer might think is a POS and go for it.




Posted

I just mean losing $2-300 on a set of crap-o-matics isn't any more of a waste than buying a 2-300 set of great irons that don't fit then he has to turn them around on ebay (not everyone likes to be a seller) or kijiji or whatever, because irons from ebay are sort of worthless too, at trade-in time.

And irons have changed in the past year and a half. There aren't quite as sets of Transformers by Nike for example. Cobra still has some goofball irons, but for the most part 2011 has much more classic irons than 2002 offered. BTW the first generation Big Berthas are virtually unplayable for someone who's ever swung a blade.

Originally Posted by max power

I guess you're right-I'm just thinking of everyone I know who bought a similar set, got even remotely interested in golf, and then was looking to sell or trade for some "real clubs" 3-9 months later.  There's nothing "wrong" with a starter set-they're perfectly functional.  But if you like golf at all you'll be looking to move up soon and the starter set will be worth next to nothing.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I concede to a degree on the ebay point (if he's not comfortable with ebay then so be it), but disagree on the change in irons.  Yeah-Nike's recent offerings look different and whatnot, but irons are irons.  I prefer blades and play them about 70% of the time, but I wouldn't have any trouble hitting some old Big Berthas.  Late last year I was visiting my Dad and playing my MacGregor blades.  We tee off at the butt-crack of dawn at his course, so there's time to goof around or practice on the course.  I hit an approach shot with my 9 iron, then grabbed his PING G5 PW to hit the same shot.  Took the same swing, very similar result.  I will admit that G5s are easier/more forgiving than blades, but I get the best results with a big cavity back when I make the same swing as I do with a blade.  Sometimes I go to the range with some old blades, new blades, and a GI cavity back.  The better I hit old school blades the better I hit everything else.

Side note-if he's worried about losing money on used clubs then I 100% recommend some used PINGs.  Eye2s, Zings, ISIs, I3s, I5s, G5s-they've lost about as much value as they're going to lose, cosmetically they hold up extremely well, and it's not uncommon to make a few dollars when you decide to sell a set of older PINGs.

You'll also be happy to know that I finally convinced my 60 year old Dad that he didn't have to play big oversized cavity backs.  I gave him my Nike Pro Combo set for father's day, and he certainly wasn't going to pass on practicing/playing with a new set of irons.  After a short learning curve he hits them as well/better than any irons ever, and he shot a career and possibly best ever 5 under a couple weeks ago.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

I just mean losing $2-300 on a set of crap-o-matics isn't any more of a waste than buying a 2-300 set of great irons that don't fit then he has to turn them around on ebay (not everyone likes to be a seller) or kijiji or whatever, because irons from ebay are sort of worthless too, at trade-in time.

And irons have changed in the past year and a half. There aren't quite as sets of Transformers by Nike for example. Cobra still has some goofball irons, but for the most part 2011 has much more classic irons than 2002 offered. BTW the first generation Big Berthas are virtually unplayable for someone who's ever swung a blade.




Posted

Buy a new beginer set because they are

  • Forgiving and made from multi material heads for larger sweet spots, off set and perimiter wieghted
  • Compelet even with a putter and bag
  • Cheep so you can try and hit out of a fairway bunker and not worry about scratching up your 5 iron

Dont buy a good set (even used) untill you have found your swing.

Even if you buy another set in 6 months you'll end up paying more for one or two clubs than whole beginer set.

Once you retire the beginer set keep it as It's always good to have a spare set for a guest or friends.

I just put my Adams Tieght Lies away this year after banging um arround for 2 years and got Mizuno JPX pro irons and titleist woods/hybrid.

I do not regreat one penny I spent on the Adams beginer set and I am very happy I waited to get a good set as I know what my game needs are now.


Note: This thread is 5408 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.