Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6520 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
People work VERY hard to get big bulky muscles and big bicepts. You wont get them by accidentally training too much or by doing the wrong things, so the threat of getting them big and it throwing off your swing is a moot point.

Everything works together as a unit. That's why there is no particular muscle you can work to make you drive further. like theres nothing you can strengthen to throw the whole unit off. I think we've all seen the pee wee highschool kid out drive the big guy on the course.

Work out to live longer so you can play golf longer and thats what you get. work out to get huge and bulky, thats what you get. results wont come by accident. If you dont train right, they just dont come at all.

I'd focus more on food too. Thats the biggest thing.

just my 2 cs

In my Bag:

Tour Burner 9.5* ProLaunch Red Shaft
Baffler TWS & DWS Hybrids: 2,4
Irons: 09 Burners 4-AWWC Liquid Copper SW 56*WC Liquid Copper LW 60*Putter: Black OZ T130 TP Black


Posted
I do A-level pe and it has inspired me to come up with a golf specific work out, I am going to do some detailed research in to the perfect golf work out, and also the perfect golf diet and when I do I will post my results.

I look forward to reading more about this from you. please keep us updated .

whats in my bag,

Driver- 975D 7.5*
3 wood- 975F 13*
Irons- 2-pw Acushnet Tungsten AC-108'swedges-58* 64*putter-bag- staff I know its huge, but I dig it " I am McLovin"


Posted
I do A-level pe and it has inspired me to come up with a golf specific work out, I am going to do some detailed research in to the perfect golf work out, and also the perfect golf diet and when I do I will post my results.

Quick update - 90% of my coursework is now out of the way, in the next couple of days I can most likely start looking in to this properly, how ever I have been looking in to nutrition quite a bit so might be able to post something about diet maybe in the next week.

JaY_B

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
heavy weights and low reps build bulky muscles. you would not want to do that for golf. im not a sports fitness expert by any means but I do know that advice is wrong. also, a risk of joint injury is increased when using a high % of your max lifting weight

heavy weights, low reps, lots of stretching and no fixed machines. concise eh.

oh medicine ball, clock squat, forearm rotations, wrist curl, plank, push ups etc etc lemay - my advice was wrong eh? i think you will find that it is bang on. heavy weights and low reps build strength - you aint going to wake up one day and go oh dear my muscles are too big to play golf - low reps and big weights do not greatly increase bulk they increase muscle density why comment if you dont know?

Posted
to each his own but i know from experience your info is wrong for golf. more weight puts more stress on your joints, which can lead to injury. and yes, heavy weights and low reps build more bulk muscle rather than lean muscle. sure you can make gains faster with low reps and heavy weight, but is that beneficial to golf if you play everyday? no. by no means am I saying lifting a 45 lb barbell 10 thousand times is better than lifting say 225 lb for 3 reps, but i do beleive that reps in the 8-12 range are better for building lean muscle which has been proven to accelerate a golf swing, while maintaining flexibility.

obviously anything is better than nothing.

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Posted
i have written a good set of exercises for improving golf striking and power - find me a credible source that disagrees with anything i have written

Posted
can i read some of your work? please post

a credible source for me is an interview with tigers trainer and himself. he seems pretty legit

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Posted
Quick update - 90% of my coursework is now out of the way, in the next couple of days I can most likely start looking in to this properly, how ever I have been looking in to nutrition quite a bit so might be able to post something about diet maybe in the next week.

A big failure here on my part, just been hit with another load of coursework (History and PE - this work might interest some on here so might possibly post some of it up)

Apologies but in the next two weeks I should have some good, solid information available
lemay - my advice was wrong eh? i think you will find that it is bang on. heavy weights and low reps build strength - you aint going to wake up one day and go oh dear my muscles are too big to play golf - low reps and big weights do not greatly increase bulk they increase muscle density

I feel the need to say that while the theory is not incorrect (I will not call it correct either), the application to golf is flawed, as you should know (seeing as you claim to have a training programme designed for golf) pure strength is not the key to a good golf swing, or hitting the ball a long way. Seeing as your advice was not "wrong" would you be able to tell me the exact muscles we should all be working in order to improve our swings? or maybe what movements all our joints do in the downswing, for example what type of joint is a human shoulder blade, and based on that what is the particular movement the 'joint' has to perform in order to complete the downswing (it is a ball and socket joint and has a combined movement of Flexion and Extension on the downswing, before you google it!). Using the training method of low reps and high weights to improve a golf swing, and the distance you hit the ball is absurd to say the least. Yes there should be an element of strength training in any good golf training programme, but it should not be the main factor of your programme.

There seems to be a certain level of ignorance in your post, to me it sounds like you have googled a 'good' training regime without any knowledge of what you are talking about, and as a result made a bit of a fool of yourself when someone who knew better made issue of what you said.

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
can i read some of your work? please post

where is the interview? it sounds like a good read. I'm still interested in what Jay_B has coming, I'm not sure anyone has devoted their entire program from start to finish on golf. I'm sure if he nails it, it has book potential all over it. one that I would buy. keep up the good work Jay_B.

whats in my bag,

Driver- 975D 7.5*
3 wood- 975F 13*
Irons- 2-pw Acushnet Tungsten AC-108'swedges-58* 64*putter-bag- staff I know its huge, but I dig it " I am McLovin"


Posted
the interview / article was the mens fitness where tiger is on the cover and the full spread he did in golf digest a couple months back (he is on the cover). his trainer hinted on what he did.

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Posted
the interview / article was the mens fitness where tiger is on the cover and the full spread he did in golf digest a couple months back (he is on the cover). his trainer hinted on what he did.

thanks for that. I will try and find that a little later. BTW how do you like your Bobby Jones driver?, seen one a couple of weeks ago and thought about putting a bid in, but hadn't really talked to anyone who has done anything with one.

whats in my bag,

Driver- 975D 7.5*
3 wood- 975F 13*
Irons- 2-pw Acushnet Tungsten AC-108'swedges-58* 64*putter-bag- staff I know its huge, but I dig it " I am McLovin"


Posted
to each his own but i know from experience your info is wrong for golf. more weight puts more stress on your joints, which can lead to injury. and yes, heavy weights and low reps build more bulk muscle rather than lean muscle. sure you can make gains faster with low reps and heavy weight, but is that beneficial to golf if you play everyday? no. by no means am I saying lifting a 45 lb barbell 10 thousand times is better than lifting say 225 lb for 3 reps, but i do beleive that reps in the 8-12 range are better for building lean muscle which has been proven to accelerate a golf swing, while maintaining flexibility.

Let's break this down...

"more weight puts more stress on your joints, which can lead to injury" = probably true. You shouldn't be working at or near maximums without a solid history of weight lifting. However, it should be clear that maximum means your maximum PERFECT rep. and yes, heavy weights and low reps build more bulk muscle rather than lean muscle. = WRONG. Low reps do not build muscle mass, they build strength. but i do beleive that reps in the 8-12 range are better for building lean muscle which has been proven to accelerate a golf swing, while maintaining flexibility = wrong. acceleration is a function of the ability to contract quickly. Low rep workouts are designed to create maximum acceleration. Did you know Olympic weight lifters have 40+ inch vertical leaps? And "lean muscle" is a misnomer. All muscle is lean (or it wouldn't be muscle!). You can have muscle that has enhanced density (built from low rep workouts or muscle that is larger that has the same strength level. Power athletes increase muscle mass then increase density to gain maximum power.

Posted
to each his own.



from Mens Fitness............


• High-Rep Weight Training: This program features higher reps (often 25 to 50) and submaximal weights, rather than the sets of 6-12 reps with heavier weights favored by bodybuilders and others trying to add size. "We're working for balance, control, endurance, and speed," says Kleven.

Woods lifts to enhance his entire body, with a specific emphasis on the back and shoulders ("Because we're always hunched over and we need our back muscles to support our posture and our swing," he says); legs ("That's the platform for everything"); and chest ("Yes [I bench-press], but I don't like it. I do it to change it up, to shock the muscles. I just do it to get that muscle group stronger. I'll hit 'em from different angles with different types of machines or free weights. I do different things so the muscles don't get accustomed to doing the same thing all the time.")

Right now, Kleven says, Woods' lifting level is "off the charts." He wouldn't talk specific weights but said Woods recently reached new highs. "His endurance and strength allows us to do more reps at high levels [of weight] than normally seen in a golfer. His resistance for high reps is extremely high."

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Posted
to each his own.

wow pretty much says it all right there doesn't it?

whats in my bag,

Driver- 975D 7.5*
3 wood- 975F 13*
Irons- 2-pw Acushnet Tungsten AC-108'swedges-58* 64*putter-bag- staff I know its huge, but I dig it " I am McLovin"


Posted
Check out 'Get Yourself in Golf Shape' by Cindy Reid. Utilizes some weights, and will build the foundation that you will need to begin supersetting in the way that Tiger is. The biggest problem for many will be going directly to Tiger's routine without building the proper foundation.

David C. Cleveland

In My Bag:

Driver: Big Bertha 4603 Wood: Big BerthaHybrid: Rescue Dual 3 19 degreeIrons: Big Bertha 2006Wedges: x forged mdPutter: 33 inch Natalie center shaftedBall: HX TourHome Course: Wellshire Golf Course, Denver, COVisit my musings at...


Note: This thread is 6520 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.