Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

How to make Augusta more Challenging?


Note: This thread is 6488 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Been away for a while nice to be back and to opine on such an interesting topic.
Regarding making Augusta harder I do not feel that lengthening the course achieves this end at all. I did not enjoy last years event, if I want to watch the best players in the world struggle to break par I watch the US Open, which I admit I do enjoy enormously. The Masters for me has always been about sublime shot making and amazing putting and it bothers me not one jot if the winner is 10 under par. I would in fact argue that this was a unique part of the character of the masters, in the same way that the toughness of the US Open sets it apart and the nature of links golf sets the Open apart from other majors. In fact I think you could argue that the PGA has recently been seen as the 4th major precisely because it lacks a uniqueness of its own since switching from the match play format many years ago.

Making courses longer only plays into the hands of the very players you are seeking to protect the course from. Make the rough 12 inches deep. Have deep-faced bunkers in and around 280 yards to catch the longer players drives as they land but not the shorter hitters. Have the bunkers grooved in the same way Jack Nicklaus does at His tournament. All these things should encourage accuracy at the expense of prodigious distance which must be a better way than just making course longer surely.

Just adressing another point made in this thread regarding the differances between US Open courses and Open courses I would suggest that the presentation of the course is the greatest differance . Pebble beach whilst being on the shore line is in no way a links course in so far as it is set up as a US target style golf course. Any of the Open courses run much firmer from tee to green and due to the unulations of the natural terrain ensure that a far grater variety of shots are needed to compete ones round.

Note: This thread is 6488 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.