Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1687 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I always played forgings. But with pretty bad arthritis and me never knowing which swing will show up, it was time to get game improvement irons. I didnt bother getting fit for the same reason, too inconsistent in swing speed and path day to day.. Last two times I got fit, it was a good day and they wanted to put me in stiff shafts. Stiff wont work for me on bad days, I'd barely get a 5 iron off the ground.  Kid and I went to  Carl's Golf Land today and we hit clubs. Lots of clubs. T200's, T300's,  Both Apex cavities, Mizzy JPX series. Srixon, you name it, if there is a name brand game improvement iron out there, we hit it. Came down to the Mizuno Hot Metal Pro and the T300. I ended up with the T300's because the long irons were a lot easier to hit, and I didnt get as many jumpers, shots that went unexpectedly 15 yards long. The Mizunos appealed to my eye better, but the T300's were easier to play knockdowns and were more willing to work with control either way.  Hit the course. Scored like crap, need to learn my distances on these monsters. I think I'll drop the 48 degree wedge and put my 50 degree Vokey back in, it's a money club for me.  The 4 iron is a beast off the tee., I was carrying it 215-220. May have to keep the 4 and drop the 5 for my M6 6 wood I fell in love with for its versatility. Got a pretty damn good deal too, 4-pw + 48degree wedge for $920.00.... That was a lot less money that most of the other clubs we tried, not all (I.E. Callaway Mavric was a lot less, felt fantastic, but was just too long for me, I'd need 6 wedges...........


Posted
3 hours ago, Esox said:

I always played forgings. But with pretty bad arthritis and me never knowing which swing will show up, it was time to get game improvement irons. I didnt bother getting fit for the same reason, too inconsistent in swing speed and path day to day.. Last two times I got fit, it was a good day and they wanted to put me in stiff shafts. Stiff wont work for me on bad days, I'd barely get a 5 iron off the ground.  Kid and I went to  Carl's Golf Land today and we hit clubs. Lots of clubs. T200's, T300's,  Both Apex cavities, Mizzy JPX series. Srixon, you name it, if there is a name brand game improvement iron out there, we hit it. Came down to the Mizuno Hot Metal Pro and the T300. I ended up with the T300's because the long irons were a lot easier to hit, and I didnt get as many jumpers, shots that went unexpectedly 15 yards long. The Mizunos appealed to my eye better, but the T300's were easier to play knockdowns and were more willing to work with control either way.  Hit the course. Scored like crap, need to learn my distances on these monsters. I think I'll drop the 48 degree wedge and put my 50 degree Vokey back in, it's a money club for me.  The 4 iron is a beast off the tee., I was carrying it 215-220. May have to keep the 4 and drop the 5 for my M6 6 wood I fell in love with for its versatility. Got a pretty damn good deal too, 4-pw + 48degree wedge for $920.00.... That was a lot less money that most of the other clubs we tried, not all (I.E. Callaway Mavric was a lot less, felt fantastic, but was just too long for me, I'd need 6 wedges...........

6-wood? Don’t you mean 9-wood? 
 

I tested the T300 irons, didn’t really care for them. Thought they were too long for me.

You didn’t try the Mavrik Pro? The lofts are almost the same as the T300s. 

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

6-wood? Don’t you mean 9-wood? 
 

I tested the T300 irons, didn’t really care for them. Thought they were too long for me.

You didn’t try the Mavrik Pro? The lofts are almost the same as the T300s. 

Yes, I meant 9 wood. I tried the Mavriks, they were both very long. And I just couldnt deal with the colors on the cavity insert. Same with the Taylormade Sims. Just too gaudy for my concervative old man taste.  


Note: This thread is 1687 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.