Jump to content
IGNORED

Weird Putter Significantly Improved My Putting


Note: This thread is 1059 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

On 6/10/2021 at 4:48 PM, Shorty said:

A truer statement has never been made about putters and ball alignment markings.

I would urge every player to try the following experiment:

Mark a line on your ball and prepare for  straights putts from say 6 and 10 feet. 

Now, lie on the green and line up the line with the hole perfectly.

Now, stand up and address those putts in your normal putting stance.

In many cases you will be absolutely shocked at how off-line it now seems. In my case, from six feet it would appear to be 1 foot to one side. At least.( I do wear glasses).

What is just as amazing is how your brain can compensate for this optical illusion/issue/reality.

I make a point of having no ball markings visible when I putt. Unless in the experiment I mentioned  it looks perfect at address, don't use lines on the ball and prettty much  ignore alignment aids on putters. FWIT I consider myself to be a very good putter.

 

Totally agree. I place the ball so all I see is white. And I like a putter which is as plain looking on the top as possible. I remember when the "ball" putters came out, I thought that would be a great design to help alignment, but it didn't seem to make alignment any easier for me. So many variables effect visual perception such that what we see from one position is often very different than what it looks like from another position. I missed short putts for a while because I couldn't get lined up. I even went to a SAM Putt Lab in NJ and had my stroke analyzed to make sure I wasn't doing something weird in the stroke (I wasn't). What seems to work for me is 1) fewest possible lines and markings, 2) line it up from behind, choosing an intermediate target close to the ball, 3) address the ball with putter aimed at the intermediate target, 4) focus on the ball and trust it, 5) stay still and make a smooth stroke. 

Regarding what someone said about short backstroke and accelerating, I have never seen someone putt this way where it looks "athletic" to me. It always looks wrong to me for some reason. When I've tried this, I found it made me have a tendency to direct the putter offline when trying for the acceleration. I just try for smooth back and through. 

JP Bouffard

"I cut a little driver in there." -- Jim Murray

Driver: Titleist 915 D3, ACCRA Shaft 9.5*.
3W: Callaway XR,
3,4 Hybrid: Taylor Made RBZ Rescue Tour, Oban shaft.
Irons: 5-GW: Mizuno JPX800, Aerotech Steelfiber 95 shafts, S flex.
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM5 56 degree, M grind
Putter: Edel Custom Pixel Insert 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/12/2021 at 5:32 AM, Adam C said:

 Shorter back stroke with more acceleration is usually going to help more golfers than it would hurt.

Great way to push jab your short putts!!!!!

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1059 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I suggest you actually read some of the Rules, either online or on the USGA (or R&A) phone app.  Here's the Definition of Committee: You have a small league, whoever is in charge of that league is the Committee.  This would be the same person (group) who might decide that you should play Lift Clean and Place (Modal Local Rule E-3), to institute the "leaf rule", (MLR F-14), or that you should move a ball out of aerification holes (MLR E-4).  
    • Website. And yeah I was asking about the specifics within those sections under the performance tab. I guess the strokes gained by distance like you noted is probably a good place to start. This would indicate that my wedges need practice, which I figured as much so I'm not surprised by that   Some of the other ones specifically around the short game I struggle to make sense of what it actually means. Like I know this chart is measuring the percentage of the time that I get the ball within certain proximity ranges but I don't know from a quick glance at this where I need to improve.   But then again I guess these two would seem to indicate that it's chipping inside 25yds from the rough that has the most room for improvement? Does it seem like I'm interpreting that right?
    • What is this committee I keep hearing about? We’re a small league playing at a county course. And these are temporary issues that may be gone in a day or two. In any case, I wish more people agreed with me. It seems that trying to convince golfers to modernize rules is like trying to change the Bible. The safeguard is that you have to check with your  opponent to make sure he agrees with the drop, why should you need a committee for that?
    • We’re discussing rules. By definition, it’s going to involve semantics. You hit your ball in a bunker, which under normal conditions, you’d have a bunker lie. If you declare your ball unplayable, you would be allowed to drop outside of the bunker for two penalty strokes. You happened to hit it under water in said bunker due to ACC. Because of the ACC, your relief option outside of the bunker could be taken for only one penalty shot. Again, the stroke is added because you would have changed your lie from from a bunker to the general area. And I would make the same argument, but again, that’s on the committee for not doing their job and marking it as GUR and not at the discretion of each individual golfer. At this point all I can gather is that you don’t like the particular situation you found yourself in, but shit happens. We’ve all been there one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...