Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1810 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Note: I was going to chime in on another thread about wedge bounce but didn’t want to hijack, so I’ve started this thread hoping to get some sound advice.

One upon a time buying a wedge was easy. When you bought a set of irons, it would come with a pitching wedge, conveniently labeled “PW”. Then, if you wanted to buy a sand wedge there would be a selection of “SW’s” you could choose from so it was a pretty simple thing to do. Well, I need a couple of new wedges and things aren’t so simple anymore. My 60° is lost. I left it on the golf course somewhere, and someone decided not to return it to the lost & found. Truth be told, I wasn’t crazy about it. I never could gauge the distance correctly with less than full shots and I really only used it when I needed to hit a flop but couldn’t because of a tight lie. I could use a new sand wedge too as the current one is pretty old but there are all manner of lofts, bounces and grinds to choose from, so what to do? It’s very confusing.

 My recent set of irons came with a 43° and at the same time I added the 48° (I don’t know what the bounce is) which is probably my most used club in my bag, hitting every kind of shot with it from 100 yards in.  My current sand wedge is a 54° with a 13° bounce (there was no such thing as a “grind” when I bought it) with which I’m fairly proficient. I went onto the Vokey website and used their wedge selector tool and it recommended a 54 & 58, both with 10° bounces and “S” grinds, whatever an “S” grind is. It also says the 54° is the “Sand Wedge” and the 58° is a “Lob Wedge”. But if the bounces and grinds are the same, couldn’t both be used out of the sand? Most of the bunkers in my area are what I would judge to be “firm” but truth be told, some of them probably haven’t had any sand added since the Carter administration.

Interestingly, the Callaway website’s wedge selector tool asked similar questions and it recommended 54° & 58° wedges, both with “W” grinds and 12° bounces instead of 10. See what I mean about confusing?

So basic questions: How does one select a wedge with the proper combination of loft, bounce and now grind factored in? Also, what would the effect be of going from a sand wedge that I'm used to with a 13° bounce to a 10°? Maybe compromise and go with a 12?

  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver, 3W & 4 Hybrid: 2023 :titleist: TSR3 
Irons: 2026 image.png.2e064f052ff54f728490dd3c58bf56c1.pngPro-M15
Wedges: 2012 :callaway: XTour 56& 2021 Jaws 60o

Putter: :odyssey: White Hot #7 (Mallet)/:tmade: Juno (Blade) plus 7 or 8 others in a barrel in my basement

 

 

 


Posted
54 minutes ago, xrayvizhen said:

Note: I was going to chime in on another thread about wedge bounce but didn’t want to hijack, so I’ve started this thread hoping to get some sound advice.

One upon a time buying a wedge was easy. When you bought a set of irons, it would come with a pitching wedge, conveniently labeled “PW”. Then, if you wanted to buy a sand wedge there would be a selection of “SW’s” you could choose from so it was a pretty simple thing to do. Well, I need a couple of new wedges and things aren’t so simple anymore. My 60° is lost. I left it on the golf course somewhere, and someone decided not to return it to the lost & found. Truth be told, I wasn’t crazy about it. I never could gauge the distance correctly with less than full shots and I really only used it when I needed to hit a flop but couldn’t because of a tight lie. I could use a new sand wedge too as the current one is pretty old but there are all manner of lofts, bounces and grinds to choose from, so what to do? It’s very confusing.

 My recent set of irons came with a 43° and at the same time I added the 48° (I don’t know what the bounce is) which is probably my most used club in my bag, hitting every kind of shot with it from 100 yards in.  My current sand wedge is a 54° with a 13° bounce (there was no such thing as a “grind” when I bought it) with which I’m fairly proficient. I went onto the Vokey website and used their wedge selector tool and it recommended a 54 & 58, both with 10° bounces and “S” grinds, whatever an “S” grind is. It also says the 54° is the “Sand Wedge” and the 58° is a “Lob Wedge”. But if the bounces and grinds are the same, couldn’t both be used out of the sand? Most of the bunkers in my area are what I would judge to be “firm” but truth be told, some of them probably haven’t had any sand added since the Carter administration.

 

Interestingly, the Callaway website’s wedge selector tool asked similar questions and it recommended 54° & 58° wedges, both with “W” grinds and 12° bounces instead of 10. See what I mean about confusing?

 

So basic questions: How does one select a wedge with the proper combination of loft, bounce and now grind factored in? Also, what would the effect be of going from a sand wedge that I'm used to with a 13° bounce to a 10°? Maybe compromise and go with a 12?

 

I like talking about wedges, because there are so many choices and combinations available, everybody has a bit different set up. For me, very similar to you, I have a 54* sw , 12* bounce, and wide sole. I don't fear any sand trap with that club, in fact I favor sand over many lies in the rough, because it's easy to put action on the ball. I have a 58* MC lob wedge with 12* bounce with a C grind. I had the same wedge in the W grind but did not care for it. I primarily use the 58* around the green in the rough, and in the fairway 50 yds and in. I find the C grind works better for those needs. I can also use the 58* from the bunker in firmer sand only, because I have went under the ball  in soft sand, leaving it in the bunker:8). Now the 54* sw, with it's wide sole, is a snap in most any sand situations. You have a nice hc so you may differ?

 

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1810 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
    • I don't think that is true at all. That is off-topic here, I think. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.