Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1234 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been Playing Golf for: 4yrs
My current handicap index or average score is: 85-90
My typical ball flight is: fade or worse
The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: fat slices

I struggle with push slices.  Some days, the shot borders on a baby draw or a decent power fade (starts left, fades right toward the center).  When I get tired, I see the shot become an out and out slice.  Providing a couple of short videos to start input.  Note - the only lessons I have had would be self-induced based on feed back from here with the exception of the 2019 COVID-19 Practice Plan. 


Videos:

Down the Line:

https://youtu.be/q0uLkhWxfAU

Face On:

https://youtu.be/J_RWg62aJiw

 

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

We ask that you embed videos, and your videos can't be embedded (because they're private, you will want to make them unlisted):

Quote

The link could not be embedded because youtu.be does not allow embedding of that video.

P.S. Plus, "studio" links won't work - they're how you edit videos in your account.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, iacas said:

We ask that you embed videos, and your videos can't be embedded (because they're private, you will want to make them unlisted):

P.S. Plus, "studio" links won't work - they're how you edit videos in your account.

Thanks Erik.  I noticed I was having  trouble on YouTube itself and thought I fixed it.  Will go back and rework so they will post properly.  

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Shot with Iphone 11 in Slo-Mo

Down the Line (6i, full swing):

 

Caddie View (6i, full swing):

 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

So, I'd spend some time on your setup. Your arms are out, the grip is likely in the palm… and then I'd work on getting more TURN and having your arms do much less early while they stay very WIDE.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, iacas said:

So, I'd spend some time on your setup. Your arms are out, the grip is likely in the palm… and then I'd work on getting more TURN and having your arms do much less early while they stay very WIDE.

Thanks @iacas for the feedback.  On the grip - I “thought” I had been setting up to be less palmsy.  However, I have a recent glove that has a wonderful hole right at the heel of the palm.  Will work on the grip first.  Do you see my having the arms “out” as a driver in the palmy grip?  Will work on that first.  

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, WillieT said:

Thanks @iacas for the feedback.  On the grip - I “thought” I had been setting up to be less palmsy.  However, I have a recent glove that has a wonderful hole right at the heel of the palm.  Will work on the grip first.  Do you see my having the arms “out” as a driver in the palmy grip?  Will work on that first.  

Kind of a chicken or egg thing.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

My 2c worth:

If you're going to do that thing where you start your address with your feet and legs together and then move them, that is usually done as a way of getting the ball position correct for your front foot, just inside your heel for most shots. Then you move your back foot back an appropriate distance. More than one way to do things, obviously, but if you're going to have a deliberate routine, you might ask yourself what it is actually achieving. If you are going to be deliberate about your setup, you may as well have that deliberation working in your favour to get your ball position right.

Edited by Shorty
  • Thumbs Up 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
15 hours ago, Shorty said:

My 2c worth:

If you're going to do that thing where you start your address with your feet and legs together and then move them, that is usually done as a way of getting the ball position correct for your front foot, just inside your heel for most shots. Then you move your back foot back an appropriate distance. More than one way to do things, obviously, but if you're going to have a deliberate routine, you might ask yourself what it is actually achieving. If you are going to be deliberate about your setup, you may as well have that deliberation working in your favour to get your ball position right.

Thanks @Shorty.  There is a reason for the deliberateness.  In 2016, I was in a motorcycle wreck where I lost all the toes on my left, i.e. lead, foot that included devolving the skin on half the foot which meant split skin grafts that are paper thin.  I have had to “learn” trust that the foot can handle weight, torque, etc. of the swing.  To compensate, I do things like turn the lead foot out, get weight forward early, etc.  Hence the work to be deliberate on the setup - to have it where I know my foot is okay.  

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Update - really been working on the setup.  Had opportunity to go to the course twice in the past couple of days.  Applying the changes has resulted in far different ball flights.  Typically with the driver it is a fade to slice, the past two rounds it has been straight (well it looked straight) to draw or even hard hook (not quite a duck hook).  With fairways/hybrids - similar flights as driver.  Irons have gone from fade-slices to hard hooks.  

Question:  Have I "over corrected" the grip to where it is too strong?   

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, WillieT said:

Question:  Have I "over corrected" the grip to where it is too strong?   

Possibly. Tough to say without seeing anything.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Got the below videos uploaded (somehow recorded and edited in slo-mo, but translated to reg speed when uploaded to YouTube) - been working on the setup (on the grip change suggested) and overall turn, especially after inpact.  IF I can get these revised to "slo-mo" I will repost. 

6i Setup - Caddie View: 

 Same swing series - 6i DTL: 

 

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

When you edit on an iPhone in Photos, there will be a slider at the bottom that allows you to place where the slow motion will be. The image below is from my iPad, but the iPhone is similar. The vertical dashed lines are the edit for full versus slow motion. Move the large vertical slider to where you want the slow motion to begin. The close dashed vertical lines are full speed and the spaced ones are slow motion.

DF8940F5-B8E2-48F2-A9CA-F18E43AC614C.jpeg
 

You can also edit the length of the clip and the orientation. Here is a raw clip that I took in MirrorVision. The angled brackets at the end of the reel view are the length sliders. When you tap them, it allows you to trim length. MirrorVision also films in a different orientation, so if I do landscape, I have to flip it. The flip icon on the left let’s me do that. You can see below, if highlighted the length in yellow.

1577799A-E2D7-43F8-B286-67923D978E89.jpeg

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
53 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

When you edit on an iPhone in Photos, there will be a slider at the bottom that allows you to place where the slow motion will be. The image below is from my iPad, but the iPhone is similar. The vertical dashed lines are the edit for full versus slow motion. Move the large vertical slider to where you want the slow motion to begin. The close dashed vertical lines are full speed and the spaced ones are slow motion.

DF8940F5-B8E2-48F2-A9CA-F18E43AC614C.jpeg
 

You can also edit the length of the clip and the orientation. Here is a raw clip that I took in MirrorVision. The angled brackets at the end of the reel view are the length sliders. When you tap them, it allows you to trim length. MirrorVision also films in a different orientation, so if I do landscape, I have to flip it. The flip icon on the left let’s me do that. You can see below, if highlighted the length in yellow.

1577799A-E2D7-43F8-B286-67923D978E89.jpeg

Thanks Boog - I thought I had edited like you said.  I will walk back through again.  Funny thing - I can edit and save through Google Drive to the desktop and repost from there.  Go figure when it is filmed/ edited in slo-mo, and the upload from iPhone to YouTube it changes to regular speed.  

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

https://thesandtrap.com/how-to/upload-slowmo/

If I AirDrop a file to my Mac and upload it to YouTube from there, that also works out just fine.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm not an instructor (or even a good golfer) and you should listen to those who are, but I mention this because it's something that I have fought a lot in the past - the dreaded chicken wing. I think I see that a bit here with you, too:

ChickenWing.jpg.cb4962e2e859e19d736eb2b68a4a23c0.jpgChickenWing2.jpg.7f2f1a8127888f3bd84d56a079d14795.jpg

 

@iacashas a video on Key 3 that shows his after impact look here:

Here's an image from that link:

Chickenwing3.jpg.dadd95d5132a764e0abf53cc1bf044ba.jpg

I hope this helps.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Posted

@Zippo - thanks man for the link.  It will definitely get me "de-winged".   

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, WillieT said:

@Zippo - thanks man for the link.  It will definitely get me "de-winged".   

Be patient and do it slowly. Your left foot issue may try and limit you from pushing the left hip back, but keep at it. I do a lot of half swing punch shots to get to that position and my left arm still bends a bit at impact.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1234 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.