Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

(edited)

I've been Playing Golf for: 5 years
My current handicap index or average score is: 4
My typical ball flight is: Highish draw, but pretty straight really
The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: Hate getting stuck and hooks


Videos: 

So sometimes i feel like i get stuck in my backswing, and to save it, i have to flip the hands, that cause a mean hook

I think im hitting a 9 iron there, wich went pretty straight

There are a few things im seeing, that i dont like. It seems like im doing a bit of reserve C or something ? And seems like my right elbow is flying a bit ?

But its just guessing on my part, since im not really sure what is getting me stuck
Sadly i dont have a film from behind yet. Ill film one, and upload asap

Edited by Avsul

  • Administrator

Yeah, the lower body/hips stuff is fine, but the head can't really get that far forward. Thing is, you say you hit it high now… but I'm not sure you know what high is if that's what you currently do. 😄

Do you have any launch monitor data? Any iron.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
7 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yeah, the lower body/hips stuff is fine, but the head can't really get that far forward. Thing is, you say you hit it high now… but I'm not sure you know what high is if that's what you currently do. 😄

Do you have any launch monitor data? Any iron.

Dont have any data atm sorry 😞 Got a picture of a 8 iron, but its pretty blurred, so hard to tell what numbers are what
Im hopefully going back in the sim thursday. Then ill get a video from the side + numbers

Any iron data that makes more sense then others ?` 6 iron, 9 iron ? Or just whatever ?
And with hight i guess i mean in relative to the speed
If i look at the pga trackman tour averages my numbers are about the same with hight etc, compared to the speed. I swing my 7 iron around 93-94mph

Edited by Avsul

  • Administrator

The quality of the sim matters quite a bit as to how much we can believe the numbers.

Peak height, spin, vertical launch angle… etc.

Ball speed. Clubhead speed. So on.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
13 minutes ago, iacas said:

The quality of the sim matters quite a bit as to how much we can believe the numbers.

Peak height, spin, vertical launch angle… etc.

Ball speed. Clubhead speed. So on.

Trackman 4 with those new balls for trackman

The trackman is pretty high quality i would say, with the mat etc
I think my carry numbers from trackman are pretty accurate to what i hit out on the course
Below is a not the greatest 8 iron struck

Those carry numbers are in meters
But like i wrote, its pretty blurry, so hard to see the numbers
Ballspeed 118, swingspeed 90 etc, but its not the greatest strike, 

I will get some better pictures of the data on thursday, maybe a day or 2 sooner, if i got time

Any irons that is better to get numbers from, then others ?

IMG_20210803_164543.jpg

Edited by Avsul

  • Administrator

7-iron should be fine. Get as many numbers as you can, like an average perhaps, throwing out any outliers.

But off the top of my head:

  • Clubhead speed
  • Ball speed
  • AoA
  • Spin
  • Spin axis
  • Vertical and Horizontal launch
  • Peak height
  • Landing angle
  • Delivered loft

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The putting green itself is fine. It's the same green we have here. They just need to learn how to chip "into" the grain instead of just down-grain all the time. You have to hit it solid. The launch monitors and the simulator software are garbage right now. Nobody wants to say anything bad about the LMs because Tiger is a partial owner or something. The software has 3Ws stopping in ten feet on the green, and balls bouncing all of 11 yards after flying 311 in the fairways.
    • Explain this:   Send 3 and 4 pence we're going to a dance.
    • Although fun to watch on a winter night, I don't think the simulation is anywhere near accurate. Watched Kevin Kisner hit a shot onto a green slope that would not roll back. When they got to that spot, they couldn't place a ball there without it rolling down the hill. Had to move to another location. The greens remind me of the pooltable-like surface of a Mini Golf course. Balls just take off and roll away. Chipping from off the green seems tricky on the surface they use. And what's with Tiger spitting during the round? It's an indoor carpet. Don't know why atheletes need to spit outdoors, let alone on an indoor carpet surface. 
    • Maybe this is what you were getting at?  Doing some math. Comparing JumboMax versus Tour Velvet, standard size in both.  I got the force required using the JumboMax grip, to achieve the same rotational acceleration as the Tour Velvet, is about 1.37 more for the JumboMax grip. Interestingly, the Jumbomax grip is about 17% larger than the Tour Velvet, and 17% lighter for the standard size. I just substituted out the radius and mass of the JumboMax as a ratio of the Tour Velvet's mass and radius. This allows me to cancel out the mass and radius and get a ratio for the force. If you need 100 (force units of your choice) to achieve a certain rotational acceleration, you will need 137 (force units of your choice).  There was another thread on the forum about offset, where it basically just delays closure by some stupidly small amount. A lot of fun math there.  Most golfers have to go from about 90 degrees open clubface at A4 to square at A7. So, having a grip that requires more force to close that clubface might not be the best idea pending the golf swing.  A question is, since the clubface is open at A4, and square at A7. Does that mean you want most of the closure to happen from A4 to let say A6, and not A6 to A7, for better consistently (less timing at impact). Just a thought.     
    • This reminds me of the old game Telephone, where someone tells a story to someone, that person tells it to the next person, and after a few re-tellings you see how badly mangled the story gets.  Most golfers learn the rules in a similar fashion, learning from someone who really doesn't know the rules themselves.  This isn't really helped by the fact that many golf professionals aren't all that knowledgeable about the rules.  In addition, most golfers have been told that the Rules are SO complicated and SO difficult to read that they never try to read for themselves. Now, having vented a bit, is there anything in particular you'd like to read?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...