Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7571 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Given that I wanted to play some golf with the 735s I just got, I decided two days ago to put an entirely different set of clubs in my bag. In fact, I actually just took a different bag... but here's what I had in it:

Driver: MacTec NVG, 9.5 degrees, Stiff shaft
3-Wood: TaylorMade r7 FW, 15 degrees, Stiff shaft
Hybrid: Titleist 503.H, 19 degrees, Stiff shaft
Irons: Titleist 735, DG S300 (Vokey Oil Can wedges 254.10, 260.04)
Putter: Titleist/Cameron Futura Phantom Mallet

MacTec NVG
The sound wasn't as bad as I'd remembered. What continues to bother me about this club is the shaft and the high torque. It's also pretty darn whippy for a stiff. I know whippiness is in no way a scientific measure of anything, but suffice to say I never found the right rhythm and even the drives I pounded didn't get out as far as I'd have liked. The high torque meant that any shot towards the toe went way right. I give this one a C+.

TaylorMade r7 FW
A review of this is coming up on the site soon (after I get the Dual Rescue review done!), but the long and the short of it is this: it's long and not very short. I hit a 3W off #8 today that went further than some of the drivers I've hit there. The ball launches very high, and you'd think hitting a shot into the wind would be tough, but the spin is very low and shots don't balloon, they just kind of float through the wind. The downside? It's not as good at getting the ball up off the fairway nearly as well as the 904. But off the tee, why, this one's tough to beat, and if you catch it clearly off the fairway, it goes quite a ways.

Titleist 735 Irons
Bear in mind I only hit a few iron shots: PW approach to the first hole, punched 5I to the second, 7I to the third, 5I to the fourth, 9I to the fifth and sixth, hybrid to the 7th, PW and PW to the last two. So, I really didn't get to test them all out, but I was surprised at how low (and how much spin) the wedges produced. These clubs were not longer than my 680s (though again, I really only hit a few shots that weren't wedges). The fatter topline was a tad distracting at first - I've always been a fan of a real thin topline for whatever reason - but these clubs swing pretty smoothly and look awesome doing it. I'll know more after I've actually hit them more than once apiece (or six times or whatever for the wedge). But I can already tell you: Dave will like them!

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
TaylorMade r7 FW

Interesting...especially about the high launch angle and low spin. I might have to demo one of these clubs. I hit my Dad's 904 and liked it. My Callaway 3-Wood is the oldest club in my bag and it may need to be replaced soon.

Titleist 735 Irons

I don't doubt that.

I'm looking forward to getting my hands on them.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Interesting...especially about the high launch angle and low spin. I might have to demo one of these clubs. I hit my Dad's 904 and liked it. My Callaway 3-Wood is the oldest club in my bag and it may need to be replaced soon.

I still like the 904 a little more, by just the slimmest of margins. If you do want the r7 FW wood, I have a brand new one still in the bag for you. I'll bring it down... retail is pretty high on these, but you can have the insider price. Whatever that is.

I don't doubt that. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on them.

$1 per shot rental fee.

Believe me, the high is worth the price.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7571 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
    • Can't remember who but some wise guy said "Arms up, body around"..😉. Anywho, been working on pinning my lead arm less and less to my chest in the BS. Decent progress with the arms, need a lot of work and trust for the 'body around' part. 
    • Wordle 1,823 6/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 5/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 4/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.