Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6469 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm in the market for a new driver. I am currently swinging a Titleist 983K (364cc) and I am fairly satisfied with it. I think I could improve my accuracy with a slightly larger club head. I have been looking into some of the newer drivers but I think that 460cc is too much for me. I was considering the Ping Rapture, the 907, the r7 superquad, and even the Nike SQ tour. Then I stumbled upon the old Taylor Made R580. It's only 400cc and I can get one more a very reasonable price. However, I have struggled to find any quality reviews on it.

I would like to hear from you all what your experiences with the club have been. How does it compare with other drivers that are out? What is the overall quality of the club? etc. etc.

I don't want to have to settle on reviews from people who know nothing and I realize that you all are possibly the most knowledgable group of golfers I have ever discovered. Please let me know anything you've heard or expeirenced with this club. Thanks again
What I play:
Cleveland HiBore XLS 9.5 Fujikura Stiff flex | Titleist 735.cm Stainless Steel True Temper S300 3-PW | Titleist Vokey GW 52 | Cleveland 588 SW 56 | Titleist Vokey LW 60 | Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless | Titleist Pro V1x

Where I play:
Texas A&M UniversityHow I play:Goals for 2008

Posted
This should be in Equipment.

However, I swung it at Golfsmith. Seems like a nice club - large sweet spot, the head is the size of a small child. However, the only thing you can do is just go demo one.
In My TerraFirma Xi Bag:
Driver: R7 460 10.5° Fujikura REAX stock R-flex
3-Wood: Big Bertha Titanium RCH 75w Firm stock shaft
Hybrids: 585H 19.5° 4175 stock shaft
Irons (4-10): Big Bertha TT shaftsWedges: CG12 Black Pearl 52°10, 56°14, 60°10Putter: Studio Select Newport 33"Ball: ...

Posted
I have this driver and like it very much,I can hit it pretty long and straight,also it has a nice sound to it when you get a good solid hit

Posted

Sorry, definitely meant to put this in equipment section, hopefully Iacas can handle that for me

So, two respones so far, one says it's a good club. What kind of results do you get with mis-hits? My miss tends to be off the toe and results in a slightly shorter, right shot. What kind of toe mis-hit results do you get with the 580?

What I play:
Cleveland HiBore XLS 9.5 Fujikura Stiff flex | Titleist 735.cm Stainless Steel True Temper S300 3-PW | Titleist Vokey GW 52 | Cleveland 588 SW 56 | Titleist Vokey LW 60 | Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless | Titleist Pro V1x

Where I play:
Texas A&M UniversityHow I play:Goals for 2008

Posted
It's a solid driver. I've played the R580, Callaway X460 Tour, and Nike SQ Sumo (non-square) and the R580 just kinda falls in the middle. It has good length and a fair amount of forgiveness - the Callaway is longer and less forgiving and the Nike is similar in distance and more forgiving. Toe hits are definitely going to result in a short, right shot - moreso with this club than with the 460 cc clubs I've played. The sound and feel are both solid. I'd say it is easily worth the prices they are going for now.
Callaway FT-9 Tour I-mix 9.5° Driver (Fujikura Zcom Pro 65 stiff)
Mizuno F-50 15° 3w (Exsar FS2 stiff)
Bridgestone J36 19° Hybrid (Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff)
Adams Idea Pro 23° Hybrid (Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff)
Adams Idea Pro Forged 5-pw Irons (DG Black Gold stiff)Nike SV Tour Black Satin...

Posted
I used the R580 until six mnths ago-had been using it for 3 years. It was a 8.5 degrees stiff graphite shaft. got the 8.5 degrees as I was hitting the balls too high with my prevoius ERC originals. Not sure if it was the low kick point that made me able to use such low loft but i was using it ok and could control the drives with even smoother swings?? Anyway, I bought a Cobra Speed M regular shaft, yes big changes but i find the Cobra a little more volatile due to its closed face. Now thinking about a Ping G10 driver?

Posted
I used to own a Great Big Bertha II+ with 11* and a regular shaft and found when I went after the ball the shaft became too whippy and balls flew much too high. I found the 580 XD with the Harrison Titanium stiff shaft second hand and have found it to be a great club. Very forgiving. Shots out of the toe are penalised only a little, it gives a lot of scope for forgiveness. Smooth shots out of the centreface of the club are monsters. I really love hitting this club.
It could have been a bit of luck as there was no opportunity to hit the club down the range but it just felt great. I would note that when I first started looking for clubs the bigger clubs were confronting. The TM 580 XD is 440cc and is old technology compared with some of the great new clubs now and if I were in the market I would try some of the newer models as the shaft and head matches are a lot better but then if you are comfortable with a smaller club size a large headed club may always be a little off-putting.
KGC- edge bag
580 XD 9.5* harrison striper Ti S
// v-steel 15* S//rescue 17* S
710 AP 2 3 ir + 755 4- 9 S//vokey 200 48.06 / 54.14
sm
60.08// studio design 1 4*

Note: This thread is 6469 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.