Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m just starting to use my Garmin CT10 sensors and “so far so good”. But one question I have that I can’t figure out. How do you manage club yardages when you use the same club for different types of strokes?

For example, last round I used my 9I as a full swing on an approach shot. But I also used it for chipping and pitching. So per the Garmin App my 9I distance is much lower than it should be.  Would appreciate knowing how others are dealing with this. Thanks in advance. 

Driver: :taylormade-small: Stealth2+

3W: :taylormade-small: Stealth2

4H: :taylormade-small: Stealth 2

Irons 4I-9I:  :titleist-small: T200

Wedges P, 48: :titleist-small: T200

Wedges 54, 58: :titleist-small: Vokey SM9

Putter:  :odyssey-small: O Works #1 Black


1 hour ago, ChiTown said:

I’m just starting to use my Garmin CT10 sensors and “so far so good”. But one question I have that I can’t figure out. How do you manage club yardages when you use the same club for different types of strokes?

For example, last round I used my 9I as a full swing on an approach shot. But I also used it for chipping and pitching. So per the Garmin App my 9I distance is much lower than it should be.  Would appreciate knowing how others are dealing with this. Thanks in advance. 

With Arccos it knows the difference between a chip shot from the side of the green and an approach shot. It also gives you something called "Smart Distance". This is the distance you would normally hit a club on an approach shot. It differs from your average distance as it drops out all the duffs and terrible ones. Then it averages your remaining decent shots. Think of it this way. You hit your 9 iron 150 yards on one shot, the next shot you duff it and hit it 10 yards. Your average distance is 80 yards, but playing your 9 iron from 80 yards wouldn't be "smart". So, Arccos will give you a "Smart Distance of 150 yards. That example is over-simplified, but you get the idea. 

With ShotScope it allows you to mark some shots as "positional". So if you bump a shot out from under a tree or something, it doesn't count toward your averages. 

I don't know anything about CT10. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

33 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

With Arccos it knows the difference between a chip shot from the side of the green and an approach shot. It also gives you something called "Smart Distance". This is the distance you would normally hit a club on an approach shot. It differs from your average distance as it drops out all the duffs and terrible ones. Then it averages your remaining decent shots. Think of it this way. You hit your 9 iron 150 yards on one shot, the next shot you duff it and hit it 10 yards. Your average distance is 80 yards, but playing your 9 iron from 80 yards wouldn't be "smart". So, Arccos will give you a "Smart Distance of 150 yards. That example is over-simplified, but you get the idea. 

With ShotScope it allows you to mark some shots as "positional". So if you bump a shot out from under a tree or something, it doesn't count toward your averages. 

I don't know anything about CT10. 

@ChetlovesMer thanks for such a great response.  Wow. Wish I knew that about Arccos before I got the CT10. Oh well … maybe next year. Very much appreciated 

Driver: :taylormade-small: Stealth2+

3W: :taylormade-small: Stealth2

4H: :taylormade-small: Stealth 2

Irons 4I-9I:  :titleist-small: T200

Wedges P, 48: :titleist-small: T200

Wedges 54, 58: :titleist-small: Vokey SM9

Putter:  :odyssey-small: O Works #1 Black


  • iacas changed the title to Question for Arccos or CT10 Users
8 hours ago, ChiTown said:

@ChetlovesMer thanks for such a great response.  Wow. Wish I knew that about Arccos before I got the CT10. Oh well … maybe next year. Very much appreciated 

I used Arccos for years and I liked it. 

Now-a-days I use Shot Scope and I like it as well. They both have some pluses and minuses. They do things a little differently. So, one may fit your style or personality better. I found I liked both of them a lot. I do think ShotScope is a bit better value for your money. But that may not always be the case, as there are so often deals to get Arccos free when purchasing new clubs.

 

Anyway, we have a ShotScope thread and a bunch of folks on this forum using it. You can read all about it here: 

Once again, ShotScope takes a little getting used to, but once you start using it, you may start to feel like you are missing something when you don't use it. I know I do. 

I really wish I knew more about the Garmin CT10. Once you get used to it, maybe you could do a review for us and let us know what you think? 

  • Thumbs Up 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

@ChetlovesMer thanks for your summary and additional info.  I really like my Garmin watch so I thought the CT10s would be a good addition rather than going with Arccos or SS. I’ve learned from a Garmin group that the CT10 can’t adjust for different types of swings and you can’t delete / ignore a stroke for distance purposes. So while Garmin is great with GPS and navigation devices, not so great with golf sensors. 

Edited by ChiTown

Driver: :taylormade-small: Stealth2+

3W: :taylormade-small: Stealth2

4H: :taylormade-small: Stealth 2

Irons 4I-9I:  :titleist-small: T200

Wedges P, 48: :titleist-small: T200

Wedges 54, 58: :titleist-small: Vokey SM9

Putter:  :odyssey-small: O Works #1 Black


2 hours ago, ChiTown said:

@ChetlovesMer thanks for your summary and additional info.  I really like my Garmin watch so I thought the CT10s would be a good addition rather than going with Arccos or SS. I’ve learned from a Garmin group that the CT10 can’t adjust for different types of swings and you can’t delete / ignore a stroke for distance purposes. So while Garmin is great with GPS and navigation devices, not so great with golf sensors. 

You might consider emailing Garmin Support with you question, I can't believe you are the first to ask about that and they may have a solution for you to "ignore" certain shots.  Often companies track these types of requests and if enough people ask about something they may add it to a future enhancement.  And who knows, maybe they have a solution the group did not know of.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, StuM said:

You might consider emailing Garmin Support with you question, I can't believe you are the first to ask about that and they may have a solution for you to "ignore" certain shots.  Often companies track these types of requests and if enough people ask about something they may add it to a future enhancement.  And who knows, maybe they have a solution the group did not know of.

@StuM I did that as well. Here is their response that I just received. Long story short I’ve now learned that it somehow self selects shots for which to count for distance vs “approach shots”. So it’s better than I thought but wish there was a way to see the shots that create the distances.

If you look at your "Performance Stats," you will see a category for Drive, Approach, Chips and Putts. The program we use will toss those chip shots from your average.  I think when you get inside 50 yards the change take s happen.  If you hit knock down, punch or similar shots on your approach shots those might effect the average a little.
 
 

Driver: :taylormade-small: Stealth2+

3W: :taylormade-small: Stealth2

4H: :taylormade-small: Stealth 2

Irons 4I-9I:  :titleist-small: T200

Wedges P, 48: :titleist-small: T200

Wedges 54, 58: :titleist-small: Vokey SM9

Putter:  :odyssey-small: O Works #1 Black


  • 1 month later...

Arccos has a free sensor deal for several manufacturers. You can buy the hands-free link for $50. I have been considering this, but don’t personally know anyone who uses them.
 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...