Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think you mentioned not wanting to get instruction in your first topic, but I can highly recommend Evolvr.com. I find that this method of doing online instruction works very well. You can get up to four analyses a month and each focus on what's most important where you are now. I've had some 30 minute lessons in person where I lived at the time, where I tried to make notes, but it often ended up being too much information. It takes time and work to change a golf swing, so you may need to work on a few elements at first for weeks or months before you should move on to the next. At Evolvr you get a short video (5-ish minutes) with each analysis that shows you what you want to work on.

I think Erik (iacas) does most of the instruction on Evolvr now, and you've probably seen that he's very knowledgeable about golf and the swing. He's also a very good instructor and teacher. Using a good instructor and have someone else give you feedback is incredibly useful and will get you where you want to go quicker. The subscription can be cancelled at any time, so you don't have to commit to a year.

For me, the most challenging thing about changing the swing is being patient and making a change stick. Fixing everything at once is impossible, but trying to make one change each week probably won't work either since it takes time for one change to become a habit. If you work on the hands one week and legs the next, the hands may revert back to what you were doing before since you don't focus on them anymore. I can of course record a bunch of swings and upload one swing where I managed to do both at once, but that would just be cheating myself and it wouldn't work in the long run. By getting frequent lessons, it'll be easier for you to know how you're doing and get feedback on changes, drills or whatever. You can also upload chipping, pitching, putting or something other than the full swing.

Edited by Zeph
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Upvote 1

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, iacas said:

If you want to do that for the fun of it, then by all means go ahead. But, for example, I've been studying the golf swing for 15 years. It's not your full-time job, so you may be better off trusting someone whose job it is to assess things properly.

Yeah, you don't do that:

01.jpg

It's pretty simple, really:

  • You fold your left wrist back instead of hinging properly (around rather than up).
  • You bend your left elbow too soon and too much, while also moving the elbow "around" rather than "up" (around rather than up).

You need to learn what "up" feels like and to greatly limit the "around."

That's it.

PotPlayerMini64_3g4kyUeTbL.thumb.jpg.cf42f1ee3b2b8ee32166363637227d3e.jpg

Is this more what we're looking for from a trail arm position stand point.

The basic feel I have here is my arms staying in front of my chest more.

Edited by pinseekingdreams

  • Administrator
Posted
45 minutes ago, pinseekingdreams said:

PotPlayerMini64_3g4kyUeTbL.thumb.jpg.cf42f1ee3b2b8ee32166363637227d3e.jpg

Is this more what we're looking for from a trail arm position stand point.

The basic feel I have here is my arms staying in front of my chest more.

Right arm still appears to be very far across your chest.

Really tough to say in 2D.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
38 minutes ago, iacas said:

Right arm still appears to be very far across your chest.

Really tough to say in 2D.

What check can I do to see if my right arm is too far across (on video), is there any lines I can draw or something on the video?


  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Another update;

Few days ago I shot my new lowest round, breaking 70 (69) for the first time and I also played a tournament where I almost won (came second in the playoff), the score I shot to enter the playoff was even par.

After I lost the playoff, I went to the bathroom to take a piss and ran into the tournament organizer, who knows me quite well. He said he saw me tee-off during the playoff and said "You have a such a natural swing and talent, you need to allow it to come out more." It was cool hearing something like that from someone who I look up to and it made me think, hmm I don't feel like I'm even allowing 1% of my talent to really shine. I KNOW I can play at a very high level. It was a big confidence boost.

Golf swing wise, Iacas has been helping me understand how the arms work and that's really been the reason why I'm playing better now. I can thank the Evolvr program for that.

The other thing that has helped a ton is a connection ball I purchased, it's basically a ball that you put between your arms. I find this helps a ton with not allowing my arms to dis-connect from my body which improves my ball-striking.

The only other thing golf swing wise I can comment on is that I changed my putter from a Spyder X to an old brass Ping Anser. Essentially going from a face balanced mallet, to a neutral blade (slight toe hang), I find I can roll the ball better with the blade.

Other than that, the one personal thing that is bothering me is I am dead broke right now. All my marketing clients have left, I assume they just found someone cheaper. So basically been trying to find new clients and working on my golf game.

Edited by pinseekingdreams
  • Thumbs Up 2

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Had a tournament a few days back, shot even and was in a 3 way play-off. I finished 2nd, I hit it OB off the tee and recovered with a bogey. So not bad, games definitely trending. Been still working on the same stuff we've talked about @iacas. Arms feel more up and down, club also feels more in front of me.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.