Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I use a Garmin S50 watch. One of the features is stat tracking.
After every shot the watch asks "what club did you use"?
I have entered a club after every shot on every round.
I believe in being brutally honest when capturing stats, even when I chunk it, hit it thin, skull it, hosel, top it or slice.
When I posted on Reddit about filling gaps, I got absolutely flamed as no one believed my pitching wedge averages 144 when my driver averages 239.

I had to explain multiple times that I had quite a few rounds of ugly tee shots, topping the ball or nasty low burning duck hooks.

Now that I have that all straighten out I am left with stats e bring my averages down, especially the driver.
I reset the stats to the beginning when I get a new club, but really feel that a "warts and all" tells the entire story.

Looking for advice from any stat geeks. 
Do you record all shots or just the decent ones?
Do you reset when your swing hits its stride or record early season rounds?

 

image.png.fe7c6351529e30e2c0e15362f600b9a9.pngimage.png.da2610ed7a5775283fad0772024f3697.png

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, Elmer said:

Looking for advice from any stat geeks. 
Do you record all shots or just the decent ones?
Do you reset when your swing hits its stride or record early season rounds?

Well, in statistics, you probably want to exclude outliers. For your handicap, probably exclude 20% of the shots at the fringes. That thinned PW that went 150 yards, get rid of it. Same with that chunk PW that went 100 yards or less. Also, never keep track of stats for short game shots. I think the data you have is just bad data. 

A 144 PW would mean your driver average should be probably 280+. PGA tour average PW is 142. So, just saying that things don't seem off they are off. 

When I compare other irons to PGA tour averages, I am getting 5 to 17 yards less than PGA tour average. 

1st) Adjust your data. Get rid of outliers. Ditch the bottom 10% and top 10% of shots you hit. 
2nd) Your strike is inconsistent, so your gaps are going to be inconsistent. Especially at the longer clubs. You already do well with having hybrids, but at the end of the day you need to improve your ball striking.

To answer your questions, I probably track 90% of my shots. Like on Tuesday. I hit a PW 165 yards because I had the ball above my feet (delofts the club a bit), and a strong wind was out of my back right. I knew the ball is going to draw and be carried by the wind, and I was out of the rough. My PW average is like 150, maybe 156 MAX. I hit it 10 yards longer because of circumstances. That shot, I am not including in any data. I want my distances on nice sunny day with no wind out of good lies. Then I can adjust off that. 

  • Informative 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I want my distances on nice sunny day with no wind out of good lies. 


Now that you mention "sunny day" 2 weeks ago I played 9 in the pouring rain.
Wet, soggy, soft ground did not help any of my distances, nor did the slipping club.
Probably should not have included my drive a few weeks back that got an extra 100 yards off the cart path.

Great information.
I have to go back to the beginning. 

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I covered this type of thing in my book. Have you bought a copy in the 11 years since its release? 😁 You've been a member here for longer than that, after all.

If you're a 15, you want to throw out about worst 20% of the bad shots for considering things like the size of your Shot Zone, averages, etc.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, Elmer said:

When I posted on Reddit about filling gaps, I got absolutely flamed as no one believed my pitching wedge averages 144 when my driver averages 239.

18 hours ago, saevel25 said:

A 144 PW would mean your driver average should be probably 280+. PGA tour average PW is 142. So, just saying that things don't seem off they are off. 

 

@Elmer, Firstly, what @saevel25 is telling you is really good information. 

My first question would be does the Garmin give you true average or performance (playing) average? These can be very different. For me my true average with a driver is 241 yards. (That's total distance not carry.) But my performance average is 263 yards. What's does that mean? The performance average is the yardage you should play. The true average is just the mathematical mean. So add up the numbers and divide by the number of shots. For example is you hit 3 drives 250 yards and one drive squirts off the face and only goes 50 yards. Your mean average is 200 yards per drive. But if the center of the green is 200 yards away, you don't want to pull driver because you are likely to hit it 50 yards too far. The performance average of 250 is a better number to use. 

Incidentally I like to keep both numbers because ideally I'd like to get to a point where both numbers are the same. That means I'm not hitting trees or hitting the topped shot that squirts a few yards down the fairway. I believe if I can get my true average to match my playing average that would show a level of consistency I'd like to achieve. 

So, my first question would be is the 239 driver average a mathematical mean or is it a performance average? 

Now, your P-wedge. As @saevel25 said you need to remove the outliers. Are there a large number of shots that you skulled and hit much farther than intended? Not to beat the dead horse, but obviously you want to remove the those. Some software (Shotscope for example) does that for you. The second thing to remember is not all Pitching Wedges are the same. My PW is 46 degrees which I think is about average for a modern set. I have an older set in the closet with a 50 degree PW. Callaway Rogue X P-wedge is 40 degrees of loft. That might be similar to an 8 iron in a professional's bag. Lower loft doesn't always mean more distance, but the differences in loft can make it difficult to compare how far you are hitting your PW compared to how far a pro might hit theirs. 

These are just things to think about. I'm a big fan of keeping stats, so kudos to you for doing so. 

  • Informative 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, iacas said:

I covered this type of thing in my book. Have you bought a copy in the 11 years since its release? 😁 You've been a member here for longer than that, after all.

If you're a 15, you want to throw out about worst 20% of the bad shots for considering things like the size of your Shot Zone, averages, etc.

Book?
I honestly had no idea.

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Elmer said:

Book?
I honestly had no idea.


Shoot lower scores on the golf course… NOW!

Shot zones are a great concept. It takes into account a high percentage of your outcomes and allows you to play the course intuitively. 

I will say, 95% of the time, if I have a full swing, I tend to aim at the middle of the green. Pending bunkers/hazards. 

2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

My PW is 46 degrees which I think is about average for a modern set. I have an older set in the closet with a 50 degree PW. Callaway Rogue X P-wedge is 40 degrees of loft. That might be similar to an 8 iron in a professional's bag. Lower loft doesn't always mean more distance, but the differences in loft can make it difficult to compare how far you are hitting your PW compared to how far a pro might hit theirs. 

I remember watching Foreplay golf, where Scottie was hitting Trent's irons. They are lofted down, game improvement. He basically just assumed they would be one club stronger relative to his irons. He started hitting them pin high, because he's a beast. 

Yea, knowing your specs relative to your yardages is important. 

Gaps are supposed to be 10-12 yards per iron. So, if that is off have the lie and loft checked. Also, maybe long irons are not good for your golf skill level. 

To answer the OP title, when it reset. I take account of my yardages like 2-3x a golf season pending how I am swinging. Right now, if I make good low point control contact with my irons, they are usually good strikes. My irons are going a tad longer than last year. I upped my PW from 145 yards to about 150 yards only like 95% effort. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, saevel25 said:
 

To answer the OP title, when it reset. I take account of my yardages like 2-3x a golf season pending how I am swinging. Right now, if I make good low point control contact with my irons, they are usually good strikes. My irons are going a tad longer than last year. I upped my PW from 145 yards to about 150 yards only like 95% effort. 

Dude, I wish I had your swing speed. My irons are pretty similar in length this year compared to last year, but my P-wedge average is way down compared to last year. So, it creates what, at first, looks like a large gap in average performance between my P-wedge and my 9 iron. (125 with P-wedge, 145 with 9-iron) Until you notice that I'm 3 times more likely to hit P-wedge than gap wedge.

This year I've become more comfortable hitting my P-wedge different distances. I will try to flight it and/or keep it low or hit it higher and/or hit it with more spin. (I will often use it down as low as 90 or 100 yards and then out to 135) The way I use it lowers my average distance, but has greatly increased the number of greens I hit with it.

I have a high degree of confidence in manufacturing shots with the P-wedge. (According to Shotscope) I'm hitting the green 61% of the time with my P-wedge. Compared to only 24% of the time with a 9 iron and 40% of the time with the Gap wedge. 

I want to get better at all 4 of my wedges, but currently the only 2 clubs I hit the green more than 50% of the time with are the P-wedge and my 60 degree. (The 60 degree is kind of unfair as a lot of those shots are literally greenside.) 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Dude, I wish I had your swing speed.

Blessing and a curse. 😉

  • Funny 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.