Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is hole 2 at an area 9 hole track, Meadowlark Golf Course.

It's a 414 yard par 4 which doglegs dogleg right. The pinched space between the water and the trees right is ~50-55 yards.

The relevant detail not captured in the image below: the ground slopes down towards the water from all directions, which takes Driver out of play (~270 yards to the water edge but effectively much shorter - have tried and ended up dropping multiple times).

Currently, I try to hit a shot that ends up going 240 yards at the white marker pictured and accept that at my skill level (~5 handicap) this is a par 4.5+ and double bogey avoidance is what's most important.

Even with this strategy, I often end up at an angle where one of the small straggling trees or the larger treeline past the water makes a near-GIR difficult and I have to hit a fairly conservative 2nd shot.

Just making sure I'm not missing something here.

Screenshot 2026-01-26 at 9.14.01 AM.png

So it goes.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How are the trees on the right? Is that lost ball jungle or findable but difficult (low canopy) or findable and playable (high canopy)? My initial impression from the picture is you're aiming 70+ yards away from the trees on the right - can you play closer to them at the 240 range? Or is the slope taking the ball over to the white marker anyway?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't know what your shot zone is. If those trees just before the water are tall enough to impact your 2nd shot, this is just a tough hole. 

I suspect this hole plays much easier for a fader of the ball. They can then hug the tree line more and play against the slope to the water. 55 yards wide is wide enough to hit driver in my opinion. If the golfer can only draw the ball, then maybe just lay it back enough to have sub 200 in. If you hit it right, they should be able to draw it towards the green. 

It might not be too bad to press those trees before the water. A 160 yard low punch shot that runs up to the green isn't that difficult of a shot. Compared to a 200+ yard 2nd shot? 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
29 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

How are the trees on the right? Is that lost ball jungle or findable but difficult (low canopy) or findable and playable (high canopy)? My initial impression from the picture is you're aiming 70+ yards away from the trees on the right - can you play closer to them at the 240 range? Or is the slope taking the ball over to the white marker anyway?

They are very high - lost ball jungle. Could probably aim slightly more to the right though, valid point.

The trees along the right do come into play there on your tee shot if you take it too far right and don't launch it high.

28 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I don't know what your shot zone is. If those trees just before the water are tall enough to impact your 2nd shot, this is just a tough hole. 

I suspect this hole plays much easier for a fader of the ball. They can then hug the tree line more and play against the slope to the water. 55 yards wide is wide enough to hit driver in my opinion. If the golfer can only draw the ball, then maybe just lay it back enough to have sub 200 in. If you hit it right, they should be able to draw it towards the green. 

It might not be too bad to press those trees before the water. A 160 yard low punch shot that runs up to the green isn't that difficult of a shot. Compared to a 200+ yard 2nd shot? 

 

I am a push-drawer with a moderate to high amount of curvature (working on tightening that up). Depending on where exactly my ball ends up, those trees can affect the 2nd shot.

Another good idea here though, could take 1 more club up and really try to get as close to the water as possible (safely). 

So it goes.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Based on what you said, I would think the 240 shot landing about 35-40 yards left of the right trees would be a good intent from the tee. That should leave you around 175 in. On the days when you are rightish of that or at least not a lot left of it, you should have a clear shot to the green. On the days when those trees are in the way and you can't go at the green, play as close as you can and get it somewhere up near the green and make either 4 the hard way or 5 (hopefully not more than that). I doubt you'll lose much to the field playing like that.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I don't know what your shot zone is. If those trees just before the water are tall enough to impact your 2nd shot, this is just a tough hole. 

I suspect this hole plays much easier for a fader of the ball. They can then hug the tree line more and play against the slope to the water. 55 yards wide is wide enough to hit driver in my opinion.

If you fade a fairway wood, the ball would be working left to right against the slope down to the water. This would settle down more toward middle of fairway.

Then 414 - 240 = 174 yards left. This is maybe a 6i or 7i approach for someone who hits a driver 270 yards. Should be manageable.

For most golfers, a fairway wood allows more control than a driver. If you just practice a fade tee shot with a FW, I think you can pull it off.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, WUTiger said:

For most golfers, a fairway wood allows more control than a driver. If you just practice a fade tee shot with a FW, I think you can pull it off.

I disagree. I don't think it is that noticeable. 

There isn't that much of a fundamental difference between a driver and 3-wood to say it is more controllable. If both 3-wood and driver are 10 degrees offline, and you hit your driver at 275 yards and 3-wood at 250 yards, then you are 48 yards offline with the driver and 44 yards offline with the 3-wood. Maybe with other things like higher loft and higher spin it curves a bit less (less axis tilt). Even if it is 10 yards less offline, not sure that is that noticeable. 

If a hole is that tight, and the shot zone is extending significantly into the trees, good luck? If it is a 415+ yard par 4, take your chances or play it as a three-shot hole and try to get up and down for par? 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I disagree. I don't think it is that noticeable. 

There isn't that much of a fundamental difference between a driver and 3-wood to say it is more controllable. If both 3-wood and driver are 10 degrees offline, and you hit your driver at 275 yards and 3-wood at 250 yards, then you are 48 yards offline with the driver and 44 yards offline with the 3-wood. Maybe with other things like higher loft and higher spin it curves a bit less (less axis tilt). Even if it is 10 yards less offline, not sure that is that noticeable. 

If a hole is that tight, and the shot zone is extending significantly into the trees, good luck? If it is a 415+ yard par 4, take your chances or play it as a three-shot hole and try to get up and down for par? 

 

I remember hearing in the Arccos database, the average fairways hit with a driver is 60% and the average fairways hit with a 3 wood is 61%. Not really any difference there. It's vaguely plausible that people are more likely to hit a 3 wood on a narrower hole, so it may be that 3 wood is slightly more accurate, but it's rarely sufficiently so that the added fairway hit is worth it over the lost yardage. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

I remember hearing in the Arccos database, the average fairways hit with a driver is 60% and the average fairways hit with a 3 wood is 61%. Not really any difference there. It's vaguely plausible that people are more likely to hit a 3 wood on a narrower hole, so it may be that 3 wood is slightly more accurate, but it's rarely sufficiently so that the added fairway hit is worth it over the lost yardage. 


Have you ever had one of those days where your Driver is just not behaving? Luckily golfers have other options when their “Big Stick” is a little too crooked, the next closest being: a 3 wood.  Look, 3 woods are...
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As a 5 handicap do you not have any version of a fade or purposeful slice that you can game? My natural shot is pretty straight and I can't game a purposeful small fade or draw. But over the years I've worked to develop more extreme shots that border on purposeful hooks and slices that I can game with longer clubs when I really need to. More often I'm using these to get out of jail with a 2i-5i. But if any of my regular courses had a hole like this where my stock shot off the tee was leaving me averaging close to double bogey, I think I'd just commit to hitting a big slice off the tee. Club up, aim a little left of your white mark, and hit a big bender drive with the goal of bouncing it into the cant in the middle of the fairway.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 66: Played 18! Wasn't really keeping track of score, but guessing in the low 80s. Driving okay, iron play up and down, lagging putting really bad. Overall, it was good to get out and play. 
    • Day 41 - 2026-01-30 More backswing and grip work on the mat / net. Also some mirror time focused on trail weight.
    • Day 12 (30 Jan 26) -  Had hoped the men’s group would be playing, but the cold temps and delayed opening kept them at bay. Spent some time on the range working on loading the trail foot on the backswing (focusing on loading the inner portion of the foot and collapsing the knee slightly toward the ball). Learned too much really brought on a left pull.  Easing back a bit, really helped compressing the ball and overall accuracy.  Took it to the course for a practice round, focusing on this small change.  Saw better dispersion across the bag….guess this will be part of the mirror work drills as snowpacolypse 2 hits eastern NC. 
    • I’d go with the Titleist if you liked the look of the blades but were suffering with distance. They should be a little more forgiving than a full blade and still retain some workability. Also remember to consider the shafts each have as this will be a big contributor to how they feel. Clemsonfan is right though… get fit or spend a bit of time on a launch monitor 🤙
    • Day 28: 2026.01.30 Managed to make time for a few swings out back today. Need a proper bit of range time this weekend.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.