Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6589 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
As I was reading a thread about Underparnv going scratch, and then going back to a 0.5 rather quickly, I wondered this:

If you shoot a little higher than your handicap at scratch, does it go back up alot more easily than shooting a higher score at my handicap?

For example: I posted a 99 into my tracker to see If it would go up, and suprisingly It didn't. Which is obviouslly way above my handicap. Now if a scratch golfer posted maybe a 78 or 79 (which isn't that much above his handicap) I don't think. Would it go up rather easily? Or alot easier than a 7 does shooting a 99?

I'm still a little confused on how a handicap can go down and up (obviouslly scores) and what it specifically depends on? There has to be some numbers behind the curtain or a formula that makes it do this? What is it?

Thanks,
Dent
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
One thing you have to remember is only your best 10 of your last 20 are used. So if you post something higher than the highest of the 10 currently being used, your score will not change... unless the score that drops off (because it was 20 rounds ago) is lower than the score you just posted. In that case the best unused round within the last 20 (i.e., up till now not one of the 10 best being used) now becomes one of the 10 best being used, and your handicap will go up because of it.

But in the case of you posting your 99, probably the score that dropped off (the one 20 rounds ago) was not one of your 10 best, which would be why your 'cap didn't change.

Bill


Posted
One thing you have to remember is only your best 10 of your last 20 are used. So if you post something higher than the highest of the 10 currently being used, your score will not change... unless the score that drops off (because it was 20 rounds ago) is lower than the score you just posted. In that case the best unused round within the last 20 (i.e., up till now

Exactly what he said

I had a couple of good rounds early in the year last year (I think a -0.5 diff) that dropped off and were replaced by my "miserable" 75 (4.0 diff), 78 (4.9 diff) and a fashionable 81 (Kapalua Bay Course -- 7.4 diff). However, I had a bunch of low scores toward the end of the year and those are what are currently holding my handicap down. If I don't play well in my next three-five rounds, my index is going to sky rocket. 76-79 this past weekend isn't going to help things either...
underparnv

That's how I like my golf. A kick in the face. -Ben

Driver: 983E 8.5* w/ stock stiff flex shaftIrons: MP60 - 2 through 9 irons (swap out the 2 iron for my three wood at some courses)Wedges: 588 Chrome - 47* Pitching Wedge, 53* Gap Wedge, 56* Sand Wedge MP-T Black Ni - 60* Lob WedgePutter:.....

Posted
That seems so unfair when I look at it now. Does it give you any room for error? I posted a 79 on a 69/118 Course and my handicap went up!!

One bad round will make it go up? I still don't follow.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
That seems so unfair when I look at it now. Does it give you any room for error? I posted a 79 on a 69/118 Course and my handicap went up!!

I will try to break it down

There as my last 20 rounds as of the last revision: Score | Diff 81 | 7.4 78 | 4.9 75 | 4.0 69 | -1.5 82 | 10.5 74 | 2.8 85 | 12.8 77 | 4.9 84 | 10.0 70 | -0.6 68 | -2.4 67 | -3.3 69 | -1.5 75 | 4.0 74 | 2.6 78 | 6.5 76 | 4.6 72 | 1.2 76 | 5.0 85 | 12.6 I've bolded the ten scores that are currently being used to calculate my 0.5 handicap. As you can see, the 72 with a 1.2 differential is toward the bottom of my most recent scores. Therefore, once a new score comes in at the top of this list, these bottom scores will drop off. Since I shot a 76 on Saturday, that score will go at the top and the 85 will drop off the list. Since that isn't one of my lowest 10 differentials, my handicap won't be affected. If I fail to shoot a score that is lower than the 1.2 differential that is three from the bottom above, my index will go up. Does that make sense? I'm pretty bad at explaining this kind of thing
underparnv

That's how I like my golf. A kick in the face. -Ben

Driver: 983E 8.5* w/ stock stiff flex shaftIrons: MP60 - 2 through 9 irons (swap out the 2 iron for my three wood at some courses)Wedges: 588 Chrome - 47* Pitching Wedge, 53* Gap Wedge, 56* Sand Wedge MP-T Black Ni - 60* Lob WedgePutter:.....

Posted
An example always makes me understand more, I'm kind of catching on now.

If im Correct, that still seems pretty rough and no margin for error. You're next round needs to be below a 1.2 Correct? Isn't that tough to do to prevent your handicap from going up?
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
An example always makes me understand more, I'm kind of catching on now.

I wouldn't say so...not up anyway. The system was designed to take into account your potential. Therefore, it would rather keep your index a bit on the lower side. I believe there is a chart out there on the USGA site that says you really shouldn't shoot right on your handicap...it should be a couple strokes above it. The reason: You are calculating your handicap based on your 10 best scores.

I think iacas would be better to explain this than I
underparnv

That's how I like my golf. A kick in the face. -Ben

Driver: 983E 8.5* w/ stock stiff flex shaftIrons: MP60 - 2 through 9 irons (swap out the 2 iron for my three wood at some courses)Wedges: 588 Chrome - 47* Pitching Wedge, 53* Gap Wedge, 56* Sand Wedge MP-T Black Ni - 60* Lob WedgePutter:.....

Posted
okay so if you shoot a couple strokes above your handicap, which would be a 2.5, and you need to shoot under 1.2, either way your handicap is going to go up.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
okay so if you shoot a couple strokes above your handicap, which would be a 2.5, and you need to shoot under 1.2, either way your handicap is going to go up.

Remember even if it goes up, it is not going up that drastically 2.5/10 = .25 so he may go up to a .6 or .7 which I would assume he isnt going to lose any sleep over

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
You're making this more complicated than it needs to be. The 10 best of the last 20 differentials are counted. That's it.

So, if you bump off a differential that counts with a differential that's higher, your handicap will either remain the same (if there was a tie for the tenth spot) OR go up.

If you bump a differential off from 20th to 21st in order with a differential that's LOWER than it, your handicap will go down.

Either way, it's simple: your 10 best differentials out of the last 20 are what counts. That's it.

If you post 10 differentials of 6.8 and then 10 differentials of 0.3, you could shoot ten rounds where the differential was 30 and you'd still be a 0.3 index.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Also Dent, while I understand the tendency to think in terms of "I need to shoot x to go down", or "I need to shoot y to not go up", bottom line is the only goal of the system is to accurately capture your potential based on the last 20 scores... and most agree that it does that quite well.

Bill


Posted
Ya I guess you guys are right, I just got freaked out after i posted a 79 and my handicap went up, To me it felt unfair, but It's gotta go up sometime right?
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

  • Administrator
Posted
Ya I guess you guys are right, I just got freaked out after i posted a 79 and my handicap went up, To me it felt unfair, but It's gotta go up sometime right?

Odds are, you must realize, it likely wasn't the 79 alone that did it. Your handicap is revised probably once every week or two. Look at my last several revisions:

05/28/08 - 2.7 05/14/08 - 2.4 04/30/08 - 2.6 04/16/08 - 2.7 04/01/08 - 2.7 03/05/08 - 2.7 02/06/08 - 2.7 01/09/08 - 2.7 11/07/07 - 3.0 10/10/07 - 2.9 09/19/07 - 2.9 09/05/07 - 2.6 If you'd have claimed your free Scorecard license, you could see how your handicap is affected after every round.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6589 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,831 X/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.