Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is it easier to "work" longer clubs?


Note: This thread is 6407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was thinking about this yesterday during my EXTREMELY slowed up play by that awesome 2-some in front of me. Why is it that I can pretty much hit a draw or fade on command with a driver, wood & hybrid...but when it comes to irons, it's almost impossible to work the draw in there. I can cut the ball if I need to. i'm learning how to play the ball differently at points in my stance to get a different ball flight....but when it comes to working the ball with irons, it's so much harder than doing it with the big 3?
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
I was thinking about this yesterday during my EXTREMELY slowed up play by that awesome 2-some in front of me. Why is it that I can pretty much hit a draw or fade on command with a driver, wood & hybrid...but when it comes to irons, it's almost impossible to work the draw in there. I can cut the ball if I need to. i'm learning how to play the ball differently at points in my stance to get a different ball flight....but when it comes to working the ball with irons, it's so much harder than doing it with the big 3?

It's true. A matter of physics, although I know nothing about physics. But I do know you get more ball speed thus more friction against the air, thus more exaggerated effects from the friction.


Posted
No Way. Longer irons will be more difficult to effectively work the ball. the driver, hybrid etc. have more face area thus making it seem easier.

Posted
In a nut shell - the less loft you have on the club the less back spin you will get (more side spin, easier too 'work')

The more loft you have on the club the more back spin you get and less side spin (harder too 'work' the ball)

So, yes!, It is easier to 'work' longer clubs.

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
I'm not so sure about this. You can make a more dramatic movement of the ball with a 3 iron than you can with a 9 iron, so in that sense it's "easier" to hit a draw or fade with less loft, but that doesn't mean you can't alter the characteristics of your 9 iron's ball flight in an effective way. It's just more subtle.

For example, you can certainly play your sand wedge for a lower or higher trajectory, or for more or less or no rollout, or even to suck it back, or to sort of fade it a little, and those are all examples of "working" the ball on that shot. At least as I understand it. Right?
In the bag 8/12/09:
R9 w/ 63g S Fubuki | 909F2 13.5º | 909H 19º | MP-67 w/ Project X 5.5, 3-PW | Spin Milled 52â¢04, 56â¢08, 60â¢04 | BC1, 35" | Tour One | uPro

Hcp: 5.9
Trend: 5.2

Posted
In a nut shell - the less loft you have on the club the less back spin you will get (more side spin, easier too 'work')

100% correct. this is why a driver slices so much compared to a wedge.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
I think that the longer clubs are easier to work around it a tight spot. It enables you to not swing as hard and really get some work done.

Joey R

In the Bag:

905T w/Aldila NV 75x 904F w/Dynamic Gold x100 MP-32 w/Project X 6.5 Vokey 52.08 BeCu 56 MP-R 60 Studio Stainless Newport 2 ProV1, ProV1x, or NXT Tour


Posted
Also, there's something about distance there, too.

Over 200 yards, a small change can be magnified quite a bit.
Over 80 yards, that small change looks like a small change.

10.5* Driver (don't really ever use it)
3w, 5w
23* hybrid
5i through PW, SW
60* Wedge.....................................................................mellojoe


  • Administrator
Posted
100% correct. this is why a driver slices so much compared to a wedge.

Well he's not 100% correct, but that's how a lot of people like to think of it.

You don't hit your wedge as far as your driver, so even if it had the same sidespin, it wouldn't slice as much because it doesn't go as far. The angle the ball flies through the air also has an impact. Slice sidespin is left to right. If the ball is going mostly horizontal, the left-to-right matters. If the ball is going up at 45°, the left-to-right doesn't matter much (about half). Straight up, and you can put all the sidespin in the world and the ball ain't moving sideways. Additionally, people tend to make slightly different swings with their wedges. It's easier not to "slice swing" them. In other words, you can put just as much - or even more - sidespin on a wedge shot as a driver, and it'll slice less, but that's not really about the backspin.
  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well he's not 100% correct, but that's how a lot of people like to think of it.

. . . and that's what I was trying to say a few posts ago. Rep points for iacas (like he needs 'em)!

In the bag 8/12/09:
R9 w/ 63g S Fubuki | 909F2 13.5º | 909H 19º | MP-67 w/ Project X 5.5, 3-PW | Spin Milled 52â¢04, 56â¢08, 60â¢04 | BC1, 35" | Tour One | uPro

Hcp: 5.9
Trend: 5.2

Posted
I find that the longer clubs are no harder to control if I can apply more lag, and have smooth tempo.

Posted
All things being equal, the straighter the face the easier it is to work the ball. Having said that, many newer clubs with game-improvement features make it harder by design.

-k

Posted
I can draw and fade the ball with a 3 wood pretty easy,but out of all my
irons i find that for some reason i can work the ball very easy with my 7 iron
compared to the others,don't ask me why.

aeroburner tp 10.5 stiff
superfast tp 2.0 3 wood stiff
Halo 25 and taylormade tp 19 degree hybrids
miura cb 202 and wedge
tp 52* wedge, tp 56* taylormade spider mallet putter


Posted
Well he's not 100% correct, but that's how a lot of people like to think of it.

Ok. I thought the theory was (along with the launch angle, ball speed etc) was that on a wedge there is so much backspin compared side spin that it barely moves much. And with a driver which has a much faster ball speed, a lesser launch angle and which when sliced has a crap load of side spin which makes the ball curve in the air. anyway i was under the impression that what made it curve left or right is the amount of back spin compared to the amount of side spin.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
If you've ever played tennis you'll know what I'm talking about here. You can hit a ball as high in the air, straight up, as you possibly can, a couple of ways. One of them is without much spin. One of them is with as much sidespin as you can possibly impart on the ball . Interestingly, the trajectory of the two balls will be almost identical (until they land, when the spinning ball will squirt off to the side).

If you hit these balls at a 45º angle, the spinning ball would curve through the air. If you hit them at a 30º angle, the spinning ball would make a more dramatic curve through the air.

So apply this to golf. With your lob wedge, you can put as much side spin as you can possibly impart on the ball on a shot, but it isn't going to be bending around trees. That's because of the trajectory, not the backspin - just like the tennis ball.

With your driver, you can put as much side spin as you can possibly impart on the ball on a shot, and it's going to bend like crazy. That will, again, be because of the trajectory.

The point is that it isn't "easier" to work the ball with longer clubs; with any club it's basically the same deal to "work" the ball. It's just that you can make the ball bend more the lower the trajectory of the shot, so the less lofted clubs will reward your effort to work the ball more obviously than your efforts to work the ball with your wedges.

So, in practice, you don't want to try to cut your 9-iron left to right with water on the left because it won't bend, and when you're stuck under a tree and you need to punch out right to left you want to be using a 5-iron (or something even flatter; it's preference dependent upon the amount of bend and, more importantly, the distance you need). Hope this helped!
In the bag 8/12/09:
R9 w/ 63g S Fubuki | 909F2 13.5º | 909H 19º | MP-67 w/ Project X 5.5, 3-PW | Spin Milled 52â¢04, 56â¢08, 60â¢04 | BC1, 35" | Tour One | uPro

Hcp: 5.9
Trend: 5.2

Note: This thread is 6407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.