Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Golf Dying in the USA?


HytrewQasdfg
Note: This thread is 5751 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Golf is getting more expensive. Land values at Myrtle Beach have killed some pretty nice courses for condos. And with that happening other courses are starting to raise rates killing out the golfer who only plays a few rounds a year. Just my opinion.

Titleist 983E 9.5 Accra 65 Stiff Shaft
Titleist 906f2 15 Bassara Stiff
TM Burner Rescue 19
Titleist AP2 4-PW
Titleist Vokey 52, 56 Ping Craze g2i

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Golf is getting more expensive. Land values at Myrtle Beach have killed some pretty nice courses for condos. And with that happening other courses are starting to raise rates killing out the golfer who only plays a few rounds a year. Just my opinion.

Has anything ever developed where the Bay Tree complex used to be? I know in the last years it was never in great shape but a couple of the layouts were not bad. Always hate to see a golf course disappear.

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


“The problem is time,” offered Walter Hurney, a real estate developer. “There just isn’t enough time. Men won’t spend a whole day away from their family anymore.”

Whatever! What evidence is he using to back this up? Most men I know of spend hours upon hours doing recreational activities, whether that be spending time in bars, playing video games, hunting, biking, you name it.

What I find amusing is that anyone would look anywhere other than price. Golf, even practicing golf, is amazingly expensive. A large portion of this is inherent in maintaining the grounds, but in most cases it's largely a conscious decision to cater to more affluent people. I'm fortunate to live near a club with affordable membership rates that include access to a range. I know this situation is not always easy to come by though. For instance, the local muni has one of the most reasonable green fees around--between $15 and $40 depending on the time. Unfortunately, they offer no monthly "all-you-can-play" rates, so you are forced to go ala carte. Considering how I play about 5 times a week, that would cost me, oh, somewhere between $300 and $800 a month. For a while I was using their range almost daily. Even when I bought in bulk, it was still costing me about $80 a month just to use the range. Weekend golfers face their own problems. First, if you are golfing, say, once a month then your commitment isn't extremely high to begin with. Then you are faced with a weekend green fee that usually starts around $50 and goes up from there. That's quite a punch in the gut when you compare it to many other leisure activities. This is not exactly a growth situation! Golf participation may have small growth spurts in the future, but it is never going to boom until something gives with the price. When I look around I see too many clubs catering to retirees with fairly deep pockets, and not enough clubs targeting avid golfers of more typical means. I think of it this way. As a public course you could charge $50 in green fees and have people show up twice a year to play your course, spending $100 annually, or you could charge $50 a month for twilight golf and have many of the same people spend $600 annually, or more. And you're only using off-peak hours to do it. Choosing the second option brings some compromises. There will be more people on the course, and you'll have more divots and ball marks than you might like. But that is exactly the path we need if we want the sport to grow. We need more avid golfers, so we need to provide opportunities for them to play frequently instead of occasionally.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


am currently vacationing out on cape cod and think its silly how these courses try to rake in the dough cuz they are only in it for the money. if i am not riding in a golf cart (cuz i think they should be for folks with a medical condition) why do i pay the same greens fees as a cart rider?

am from the peace love and 60's and see the evil in trying to make a buck from everything. go communism!!!... or at least socialism

They will beat their swords into golf clubs and their spears into putters. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore. Old Tom Morris 2:4

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I get emails almost ever week offering play on the weekend for less than $55 including cart and they give you free breakfast and free lunch plus free afternoon replays (space available). That is not a hefty price. You can play during the week for under $30 (same deal...cart/breakfast/lunch). Believe me, these courses are not making obscene profits. They are barely breaking even. You run a business to make money...not break even.

Rick, this begs the question, how did they get it done back in the day? How did they manage to break even with such low green fees? Let me quote an article from Golf Digest in 2006:

Green fees/memberships 1981 ... 2006 Colonial C.C., Cordova, Tenn. $4,000/ ... $7,500/ ...initiation fee/annual dues $1,200 ... $5,880 Cog Hill G.&C.C.; (No. 4), Lemont, Ill. $20 ... $135 Olympic Club, San Francisco initiation $12,000/ ... $49,800/ ...fee/annual dues (including Athletic Club) $1,200 ... $4,800 Otter Creek G.C., Columbus, Ind. $10 ... $65 Pebble Beach G.L. $50 ... $450

Pay special attention to Otter Creek, since that's about the budget most of us are dealing with. Otter Creek's fees, along with the fees of most things on this list, have risen at a rate this is MORE THAN DOUBLE INFLATION. That does not indicate rising costs, Rick, that indicates a conscious decision to increase margins and/or raise maintenance standards at a course. If you get enough golf courses doing this, you end up with the situation we are in today, where you can't get on most courses without $40 in your pocket. (Does golf have new insurance liabilities I am not aware of?) This is hurting the game of golf. It's supposed to be a game that everyone can enjoy, yet it's driving away anyone who doesn't have above average means.

Like I said, for whatever reason, golf courses in previous years had no problem charging what we now would consider a pittance to play their course. My guess is they spent a little less here and there and didn't worry about living up to the Augusta standard. That is what we need. Link to the article Inflation calculator
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I posted this in another thread, but thought it was a discussion all its own.

Golf is a frustrating sport.

What I Play:

Driver: Sasquatch SUMO² 9.5º Stiff
Hybrid: HiBore 16º (3W replacement)
Irons: Staff Ci6 3-PW StiffWedges: Vokey Spin Milled 54.10 60.04Putter: Newport Studio Style 35"Ball: Pro V1xAge: 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5751 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...