Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6320 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
In my opinion, no. HOWEVER, I am not a course owner and they are the ones making the decision. They put out the cash outlay so they get to make the rules.
My Equipment:
Northwestern 3-, 5-, 7- and 9-wood;
Goldwin AVDP Irons (5-10 plus PW);
U.S. Golf 60 degree wedge;
See-More Putter; Bushnell Yardage Pro 1000 Rangefinder;Golflogix GPS.

Posted
I think it depends on how busy the course is and what type of course. I think you will find it more at the private courses than public. It would bug me if I was behind a fivesome and they couldn't keep up. However, if 5 people can keep up then I don't see a big deal about it.

I played Sunday at 11:00 at my friends semi-private course and we played with five. The place was packed but we played that way anyway. We did reserve two tee times so it was actually a benefit for the people behind us that we played five instead of three and two. We played a two on three shamble so we were able to keep up and in fact after five holes we were about a hole ahead of the threesome behind us.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted

No freekin way... The average public course stinks it up bad enough as it is. And you are not going to be able to control whether its 5 2HCPs or 5 30HCPs. Hell, as it is I dread it when I realize that I'm stuck in a foursome with three other guys at *my* skill level.

Drivers:
FT-i Draw 9* W/Grafalloy Red
Sumo2 5900 9.5* W/Grafalloy Red

Irons: A3OS 3-PW Graphite/Steel regularWedges: A3OS GW, SW, LWPutter: Rossa Monza SpiderLittle round white thing:

Posted
It all depends on the course. At a public course, no chance. There are too many variables as to who the group is made up of.

Here at my club we allow 5somes and most do just fine. Sometimes we even have 6+ in groups. Today for example there's a group of guys that will probably go out in a 10some late this afternoon and play a scramble. 99 times out of a 100 there's no problems with it.

907D2 9.5* Mitsubishi Diamana Blue 63g Stiff
905R 9.5* Accra SC75 Stiff
HiBore 15* 3 Wood Aldila NV85 Stiff
20* Pro Gold Hybrid Mitsubishi Rayon JAVLN FX
AP2 4-P,W ProjectX 5.5 Vokey Spin Mill 54.10 & 60.04 Studio Design #3 Cut to 32.5" ProV1x All #6's


Posted
As with most things, it isn't necessarily fivesomes that slow things down, it's still just slow golfers. My course (very busy public course) allows fivesomes only with special requirements. They must all be in carts (i.e. 3 carts for 5 riders.... 2-2-1), and they must commit to keeping up with the group in front of them. If they don't keep up, one of them will be asked to drop out, and they are informed of this requirement before they hit from the first tee. We do NOT take reservations for fivesomes.... they are only spur of the moment situations.

As far as pace of play is concerned, I've played in a fivesome and easily completed the round in under 4 hours. I've also played in a threesome with 2 other golfers who couldn't finish in 4-1/2 hours if they were the only players on the course (ultimate frustration when you are having to constantly prod them to keep moving). I've played in a group of five when we were pushing a threesome all the way around the course.

So it's a decision that has to be made by the course management, and it should be made with careful consideration, as just allowing it without restriction can lead to a loss of revenue if it's mishandled. If a course gets a reputation for slow play because of such a policy, the better players will simply find a more player friendly course.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Here at my club we allow 5somes and most do just fine. Sometimes we even have

WTshizzle sticks... that's the craziest tom-foolery I've ever heard of... a 10-some. No way in hell that's legit or reasonable in the game of golf.

My gut reaction to the original question was - BAN ALL 5-somes... but truth is it wouldn't be a problem if they were fast enough or the course was deserted. Problem lies in ascertaining who will be fast enough and/or have the good sense to let another group through if they get caught by a group despite an empty course.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
On weekedays only, but if the course is packed, the staff should split the group up, or make them wait.

Besides, good marshalls can fix any slow play problem. theres a military course I know of, and their rule is, if youre a hole behind when the marshall catches you, he pulls you aside, you wait for 2 groups to play through, then you can go. If it happens again, youre off the course. I know its a military course, but I think it's a good way to do it.
In The Bag

Titleist 905T 9.5°
Nike Sumo2 15°
Nike Sumo2 19°Nike Forged Irons - 3-PW Titleist Bob Vokey Spin Milled 56°10°Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2

Posted
Generally....I'd say no....it simply would slow play down too much.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
The course I play allows 5somes 'cause the owner plays in a 5some every frikin' day. They don't cause a problem because they play very fast.
However, not all 5somes are that "speedy".
We have NO MARSHALS to control speed of play.
Why is it that every 5some I get behind NEVER looks back to see if they are holding anyone up?
If there is a 5some on the course everyone behind them spends up to an hour longer on the course.
SUCKS! STOP THIS CRAP!

INTHE BAG(today)
Driver: Speedline 10 10.5deg
Fairway woods: speedline 3w
Putter:Master grig

Irons: A2 OS

SandWedge 1200GE

Balls: Soft Feel

Bag: Great Divider

Lots of Hope!


Posted
I have an open invite with a 'pickup group' of guys at work each Wed evening. We play behind the regular Wed night leagues. Sometimes we have exactly 5 players who can make it.

The course always makes us split into 3/2 groupings. They also follow us around if we decide to make it a 5-some and threaten to throw us off the course for not following the rules!

The league in front is typical--everybody waits on every tee; everybody waits on every fairway.

If we were allowed to play as 5, we'd all get to interact with each other and we'd play a bit slower as a group which would reduce waiting time.

I think courses use the 'no 5-some' rule as a defense mechanism more than anything. When play is slow, it would be really easy to point the finger at a 5-some as the cause of slow play.

What causes slow based on my experience is:
  • People show up late for tee times
  • Spacing of tee times too short
  • People looking for lost balls
  • Few golfers understand the importance of playing 'ready golf'
  • A few players treat EVERY putt like its the 72nd hole of a US Open
  • A whole bunch of other things

I guess my long story short is that I'm in favor of 5-somes because play is usually slow no matter when you play or where you play.

dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
WTshizzle sticks... that's the craziest tom-foolery I've ever heard of... a 10-some. No way in hell that's legit or reasonable in the game of golf.

I don't see why not. They're playing a 2-man scramble. So really just an exagerated 5-some I suppose. Plus, if a faster group comes up on them they always let them through.

You've got to realize this is at a private club, on member's day. It can't and doesn't happen at any other time. But things like this happen at a private club, way more than at any public course.

907D2 9.5* Mitsubishi Diamana Blue 63g Stiff
905R 9.5* Accra SC75 Stiff
HiBore 15* 3 Wood Aldila NV85 Stiff
20* Pro Gold Hybrid Mitsubishi Rayon JAVLN FX
AP2 4-P,W ProjectX 5.5 Vokey Spin Mill 54.10 & 60.04 Studio Design #3 Cut to 32.5" ProV1x All #6's


Posted
At the country club i play at, they allows 5 somes. On the weekdays you can play 6somes if you wanted.

But if it was a public course, i would say hell no to 5 somes. Takes forever as it is.

In my Vantage Bag:
Driver: Burner Superfast 9.5*
Woods: Steelhead Plus 3 and 5
Irons: Forged 300 4-PW
Wedges: CG12 52* and VR 56*Putter: SabertoothBall: TP Red


Posted
No. No way. I've had experiences where it took 3 1/2 hours just to play what I thought would have been a quick nine. We got trapped behind a 6some. It was a living hell.

Posted
i think a twosome and a threesome can join up if there is a bunch of foursomes ahead of them and no chance of playing through

driver- R580XD 9.5*
3 wood- m/speed
hybrid- cft ti 4h
irons- fp 4-gap
wedges- 54* and RAC satin 56* 12 bounceputter- 1/2 Craz-Eballs- DT Carry, e5, anything found thats is good shapeshoes-adidashome course - nothing - uh oh. perhaps pleasant view againschool...


Posted
Occasionally if a group of friends and I play and there happens to be five of us we will play a fivesome if it is allowed and if we ever see anyone waiting on us we will glady wave them by. Tonight I decided to play a quick nine at the local course and after four holes of having no one ahead of me I caught up to to a fivesome of older women playing very slow. I was in no hurry so when I saw that I was catching up to them I kind of slowed down my pace of play figuring that I wouldnt catch up to them. Well I ended up catching up to them and they never waved me through. I ended up waiting patiently while they spent about 5-10 minutes on the green. So basically I am usually in favor of fivesomes but in some cases I dont think it should be allowed. I really wasnt upset by having to wait since I wasnt in a hurry but the only thing that kind of pissed me off was that I could hear them talking and laughing and carrying on and Im pretty sure that they didnt care that they were playing slow and holding me up.

Sasquatch 4950 460 Driver
19 Degree A30S Boxer FW Hybrid
X-20 4-PW
56 SW, 60 LW
Tiffany Putter NXT Extreme Ball


Posted
I don't really mind with any kind of group ahead of me as long as they're keeping the pace.

There have been some instances where a 5 some was faster than a 2 some for me. Guess it all depends on the levels of play.

Slow players aggravate me though. I have a friend that literally takes 5-7 practice swings, addresses the ball, takes a half back swing, sets up again, looks at the target, concentrates, and looks at the ball for another 15-20 seconds before he actually swing. Kills me!

- Tour Issue Taylormade R7 Superquad TP Matrix Ozik Xcon 5 X-stiff
- Nike Dymo 3 Wood UST Axivcore Stiff
- Nike Dymo 5 Wood UST Axivcore Stiff- Nike Blades 3-PW S300- Nike SV Tour 50* 54* 58* S400- Titleist Scotty Cameron Newport Beach- Nike Tour D


Posted
My golf team plays some games that require us to play together for a while and we had an 8-some that was faster than a foursome.

In my Extreme Sport Stand Bag
Driver: 4DX D-Spec Driver 10.5* Stiff UST SR3
3W: F-60 15* Regular Fujikura E150 Fit-On
Hybrids: 4DX Ironwoods 20* 23* Regular UST SR3
Irons: 4DX CB 5-PW Stiff True Temper ST-90Wedges: Vokey 50* 56*Putter: SabertoothBall: DT Roll


Note: This thread is 6320 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.