Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry in advance for the long post.
I have been playing with S59's (zz65 stiff shaft) recently and been hitting them fine if not a little short. I went to the fitting centre at my club to check I was playing the correct setup and had some surprising results (using a 6 iron).
My swing speed was 88mph, carry 138 (it's very cold here! lol), launch angle 19* and spin 6100.
The guy said I would be more suited to a higher launching clubhead and shaft. He gave me a Nike VR full cavity with a DG S300 HL shaft with the following results:
Swing speed 83mph, carry 159, launch angle 23* and spin 4850.
I couldn't believe this club/shaft combo gave me 20 yards.
Is it a no brainer to change clubs? (If I can put my ego to one side to play GI irons off a 6 handicap lol)

adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
I think you should try different GI irons but if the VR are still the best then get those

Posted
I also went to a fitting center recently. I went with my driver that I had not originally been fitted for. I was also told that to add more carry I needed a higher launch set up. He gave me the brand new model of the driver I had been using in 10.5 loft. I liked getting the new information and am going to now try the driver outside when I can. My old driver had been doing fine for me before I went on the monitor. Such experiences can change your perception of a certain club or clubs. The feel is different and often times I am left wanting the newer club. I would not say necessarily that I was playing the wrong club though. I say this because the right club is mostly your personal perception of what that is.
In your case if the extra distance is paramount, then look into the data by trying some different clubs. In the end the Nike cavity might be the right club for your needs. I don't think that means you were playing the wrong club, though.
To me feel is very important. I bet I am in a similar situation to you with my irons as well. Right now though my irons are good enough. You are allowed to feel the same way if you like the clubs you have, I would say. If not, get the full treatment and try a lot of clubs. I would be curious to know if the split cavity forged Nike fit your needs. Happy trails!

Driver: 4DX T 10.5 Evolver w/ Redboard
Hybrids: G5: 16*, 19*, 22*
Irons: Ping Eye 2 +no+ (5-PW)
Wedges: CG12: 52/10, 56/14, 60/10
Putter: C&L flowneckBall: Z-Star


Posted
I thought I read somewhere that 90+ percent of all clubs played are not the "right" clubs for the player. People always buy irons that aren't forgiving enough, drivers that don't have a high enough loft or the wrong shaft (stiffness or kickpoint), wedges that either have too much loft, or not enough bounce.

So it's not suprising that after getting fit, you found out that there was better equipment for you. I'd venture a guess that almost every person who hasn't been custom fit has at least one aspect of their bag that's not right for them. I was cutom fit for my driver and went from a 9.5 degree to a 10.5 degree head and started hitting much longer drives.

We could all take a lesson from the pros in the area of equipment. They get completely custom fit for their entire bag using launch, spin, etc. monitors that ensure they are getting the most out of their equipment. They change their loft, lie, length, shaft stiffness, etc, yet the average weekend duffer heads to the store and drops 1500+ on a bag of off the shelf items that are designed either for a really wide variety of players, or a specific type of player that they don't match.

It's no wonder we keep going back year after year to get the latest equipment. Perhaps if we had the right equipment in the first place, we wouldn't feel the need to get new equipment each year...

"take a couple weeks off - then quit for good"

 

- X-460 Tour 10.5 Fujikura Stiff
- War Bird 15deg 3 Wood
- MX-23 Irons
- Vokey 52 + 55deg wedges
- 900 60deg Low Bounce - Studio Design 1.5 - Pro V1x - SG4Sun Mountain Carry and Great Divider Cart Bags.


Posted
Is it a club fitter's job to fit you to clubs or sell you said fitted clubs?

A 6 iron carry of 138? Swing Speed 88? - A stiff shaft is too much. You're going to see more distance with a regular shaft.

There is nothing wrong with cavity backs. A lot of single digit players use MP-57s.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
And more than a few on the PGA tour use cavities.

RC

 


Posted
try the GI irons. like the nickname for em says, they improve your game! maybe consider trading in the s59's for a really nice set of VR's. and if you are kinda skeptical about going for the full cavity, try the split cavity and see the results.the best equipment for you can only hurt your wallet, not your game. remember that.

In my Diablo Edge Tour/ Titliest Stand Bag:
Driver: Nike VR Pro 8.5* w/ Myazaki 43g X
3 Wood: Nike VR Pro II 13.5* w/ Diamana Whiteboard 83g X
5 Wood: Cobra S9-1 Pro 18* w/ Diamana Whiteboard 83g X

Hybrid: Mizuno MP Fli-Hi 21* w/ Prolaunch Red X
Irons: 4-7 Titleist 712 CB, 8-9 712 MB w/ TT Dynamic Gold X100

Wedges: 46* Vokey SM4, 54* Vokey SM4, 60* TMade ATV

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Belly 43"


Posted
yea...in this case, maybe the nike is just a way more forgiving club.... I would try the Split cavity, because that will still be forgiving, but will still have (almost) the same amount of workability as your pings. I also really enjoy my mizzy's (see sig). They are workable and forgiving at the same time! Make sure (especially in this economy) that you are comfortable with what you are going to buy before you buy it.

In my vaporlite carry bag
DRIVER ft-5. 9* Mitsubishi Diamana BlueBoard 73 X-stiff
FWY WOOD: 980F 15 EI-70 X Stiff
Hybrid: Burner tour launch 4 hybrid
IRONS mp-57 4-pw with project x 6.5 shaftsPUTTER: Rossa Classic AGSI+ Monte Carlo WEDGES vokey spin milled oil can 52.08, 58.12Niblick 42*


Posted
I asked about the split cavities but he said I need a higher launching iron. I have no problem playing a GI iron, I just don't like the look of the thick top line on most of them, but if it does the job I'm sure I can get used to it. He also suggested the AP1. Which do most of you prefer between the two?
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
I asked about the split cavities but he said I need a higher launching iron. I have no problem playing a GI iron, I just don't like the look of the thick top line on most of them, but if it does the job I'm sure I can get used to it. He also suggested the AP1. Which do most of you prefer between the two?

Both are good clubs, but I have a feeling your responses will be a little one-sided.

WITB - New For 2009!!!
||.........GTX Stand Bag......................||
||.................Sumo SQ2 5900 10.5.............||
||.................Sasquatch Sumo 4W..............||
||.........MX-200 3I - PW.....................||||.............Vokey SM 50,56,60 Wedges...||||.................Unitized...

Posted
I would rather the AP1. Have you considered the 09 burners or the tour burners? They seem to be the step up from the r7's which I have that have a ball flight that is way to high for me so they seem like they should work for you.

Posted
Did your fitter take those same Dynamic Gold Shafts and put them in your Pings?

IMHO, it's not a true fitting unless you use a single, clubhead with multiple shaft combinations. Otherwise, you don't have a true comparison.

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
I asked about the split cavities but he said I need a higher launching iron. I have no problem playing a GI iron, I just don't like the look of the thick top line on most of them, but if it does the job I'm sure I can get used to it. He also suggested the AP1. Which do most of you prefer between the two?

The head does not determine the launch, it's mainly the shaft. You could get the split cavity VR's with the high launch DG shaft and I'm sure the #'s on the launch monitor would be the same. I had the AP1's and traded them in for the MP57's after only 1 month. I hated the thickness of the AP1's and I love my Mizzy's. Just make sure you find a club you like with the right shaft. Good luck !!

In my SX76 StaDry
Woods: G15 9.0° BB Stiff, G10 14°
Hybrids: i15 20°, Rapture 24°
Irons: AP2 5-PW
Wedges: SM Vokey 51°, 56°, 60° Putter: Circa '62 No. 2 (Gun Metal Blue) Ball: ProV1


Note: This thread is 6182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.