Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1627
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted
some may say tiger has all the unfair advantages of modern technology and training methods, but no one should discredit a man for being on top of his game. tiger!

Posted
It is really pointless to compare era's. Jack said he was just trying to win tournaments to put "bread on the table". Tiger grew up with Jack's picture(s) in his bedroom with the full intent on beating his major wins, which he most likely will do. Also Jack said that he thought Tiger is better than he was and Tom Watson felt that the competition is just as intense as it was when he, Lee T., Arnie, Gary and the boys were play'n against Jack. Pretty hard to say "pashaw" to those guys.

All the greats have brought good stuff to the game and will continue to do so.

I don't agree with some that have posted Tiger being the greatest athlete. He is indeed the highest paid althlete, but compared to most any NBA or NFL player he doesn't have as much athletic prowess, IMO.

To me the greatest althlete golfer was Babe Zarharias. She was not just good, but great at EVERY althletic endevor she did. And this was back when women were supposed to stay at home, cook and have babies.

And thats my 2 cents.

Posted
Obviously they are both the greatest of their respective times which is all you really have to go on. Still, if Jack in his prime were magically transported to the next major with all modern equipment I would still bet on Tiger.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Currently, I have to give it to Mr. Nicklaus but if Tiger keeps up his pace (prior to the last 15 months), he will surpass Mr. Nicklaus. It's going to get harder for Tiger though. He is getting older (I know only 33) but some of his invincibility has disappeared. Just ask YE Yang. Many of the new younger golfers don't fear Tiger.

Posted
Both are/were incredible golfers but I get to watch Tiger play so he is my fav. The greatest... is yet to be determined.
Putter: Carbite
Wedges: Mizuno R-Series (54 & 60 degree)
Irons: Mizuno MX-900 (3-P)
Hybrid: Mizuno CLK FLI-HI (20 degree)
Woods: Mizuno MX-700 (3W & Driver)

Posted
Jack won 73 tournaments in 580 starts, or so

Tiger has won 70 tournaments in 270 starts, or so

So Tiger could go winless for his next 300 tournaments and still have about the same number of wins as Jack.

Not really a fair fight.

Posted
Defently Tiger.

Driver: Adams SC-818 FC
Woods: Calcutta TL Plus, 3,5,7
Irons: Giant GX2 Oversized, 4-PW, GW
Putter: Tour Balance B-3P
I know it's not much but at least I'm having fun.


Posted
Hate to say it...ok.. Not really... Tiger Woods, He's a bad mother trucka.

Driver - Cleveland Hi-Bore XLS Monster 10.5°
3W - Cleveland Hi-Bore 15°
2H - Cleveland Halo
3I - PW - Cleveland CG Red
GW - Cleveland CG 12 Camo 52°SW - Nike SV Tour 56° Putter - Sabertooth


Posted
I think for now Jack is still the man. He's got the majors to prove it. I believe that eventually Tiger will probably statistically overtake him.
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote, 'A flute with no holes is not a flute. And a doughnut with no hole is a danish."

909 D3 Diamana Blueboard 63g
909 F2 3 Wood
MP-57's 4-pwIdea Pro 2 and 3 iron hybridsTour-W 52 deg wedge Tour-W 56 deg wedge2 Ball center shaft putterProV1

Posted
I love em both but I have to say that the advance in technology does give Tiger an advantage over Jack

In my attack bag im rocking....
10.5 420cc driver
3 wood
3+5 hybrid
3-9 s2h2 irons x20 PW x20 SW OZ-1 putter D2 feelnot the best set up yet but im on a student budget =P


Posted
I wasn't alive at jack's prime so I go with tiger being the greatest golfer, also tiger can rip it further, has a better short game, and he's a built athlete, what else is their to say?

This guy pretty much sums it up for me!

SQ Dymo2 Str8 Fit 10.5*
SQ Dymo2 3 Wood 15*
SQ Dymo2 5 Wood 19*
Burner Plus Irons - 4-AW


Posted
I think in this technological era, where an average player has unlimited tools at their disposal, (ex. high speed video, launch monitors, club monitors) there is a greater possibility for improvement . And to have a player stand out consistently as the best in the world year in and year out says a lot about that person.. Tiger Woods, in my opinion, has changed his sport more than anyone else has in their respective sports. (Jordan, Jeter, Federer, Ronaldinho)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.