Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hey y'all,
I have heard and seen all the posts about how to "hit down" on the ball when using irons. When everyone mentions this in the threads, they talk about their wedges and 7, 8, and 9 irons. I would like to know, but think that I know the answer, if I should do the same with the long irons (3, 4, and such). I'm assuming that I should, but I just want to make sure before I go to the driving range tomorrow and try to change my swing.
I have been trying to scoop the ball so far, having the ball right where the lowest part of my swing is, or right behind it slightly, and I haven't been doing too bad really. But since I now know that I am swinging incorrectly, I am going to try to change tomorrow.
(I have already tried hitting down on the ball, but I wasn't sure I was doing it right, so I went back to trying to scoop it. So it's not like I'm starting off not having the slightest clue. lol).

One last thing, I watched a video last night where the guy said to keep the left wrist straight so is that correct? Should I start off with the handle in front on address or try to mess with that later? I haven't tried it yet, so it may be easier than I think. (I always have the problem of over analyzing everything.. lol).

Thanks!

HookEmHorns

In my 14 Xtreme bag:

Driver Burner 10.5*3 Wood Rawlings 15*5 Wood Ignite 19*Irons S2 Max 4-GWPutter Rossa Corza Ghost 35" Next to be replaced: 3 wood. All Rawlings junk has got to go. haha


Posted
Yes, you want to hit down on the ball with long irons. I've read many times that you want a more sweeping motion with your long irons, but I think that is a dangerous image for beginners, as it can lead to scooping.

Ball position is key here. Make sure to move the ball up in your stance for long irons, and stand further away from the ball. This will flatten your swing out a little more, so that the "hitting down" motion is not nearly as steep as with, say, a pitching wedge. Many people don't move the ball up in their stance when hitting these clubs, and end up hitting these clubs too low, which eats into your distance.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
moe norman and sam snead are two of the greats who both swept their long irons (i believe they started hitting down once they got to a 5 iron). just treat those long irons the same as if you were swinging a fairway wood. you don't scoop those when you swing, nor do you hit down with them, you just brush the ball off the ground.

Posted
im curious as well... im awesome with up to the 5 iron... and hit down with all the short clubs as well as the 5. once i get to the 3, 4, and hybrid i can't seem to do anything consistently..... ive hit amazing shots hitting down... hit great shots sweeping........... but i get inconsistent results and don't feel like im doing it right so i just randomly change things up at random times.

itd be really helpful if someone can refer me to some reputable source explaining which is the "right" way... and WHY it's the right way...

Driver: Tour Burner 9.5° Stock Stiff
Wood: Tour Burner TS 13° Stock Stiff
Hybrid: Tour Burner T2 18° Stock Stiff
Irons: Tour Preferred 3-PW Rifle Project X 6.0
Wedges: 54.10|58.08 Z TP Rifle Spinner 5.5 Putter: VP Mills VP2 Ball: TP/Red.LDP Bag: Warbird Hot Stand Bag 2.0Started playing...


  • Moderator
Posted
It's more of a sweep than a downward blow. For instance, with your 7I you take a pretty noticeable divot because you are hitting down on it. With the 3I, you still take a very small divot but it is just enough to take the grass off the top...this is because it is more of a sweeping motion.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well I was wrong in my terminology, I haven't been scooping the ball, it is more of a sweep. I have been having pretty good luck but would hitting down work better? Since it is actually using the club to do the work I would assume that it would be the better choice.

HookEmHorns

In my 14 Xtreme bag:

Driver Burner 10.5*3 Wood Rawlings 15*5 Wood Ignite 19*Irons S2 Max 4-GWPutter Rossa Corza Ghost 35" Next to be replaced: 3 wood. All Rawlings junk has got to go. haha


Posted
there's a short article in the last issue of Golf Digest about the thousands of tips submitted over the years. I think the number was around 36,000. Someone put a book together of the top 250 (or so) ideas. There's a quote from Jack Nicklaus saying something to the effect of pretending your 3 iron was stamped as a 7.

Posted
Just hit the little ball first. If you making contact with the golf ball before the earth its should be solid contact. I dont think its good advice to hit down on long irons. More like a 3 wood. I agree with TN94z, sweep more than down. I think high handi players who concentrate on hitting down tend to jab straight down and not follow through. Just remember to hit the little ball first and make solid contact. There is a new trend where many pros are trying to take small divots. It may not even be that new but its much easier to be consistant picking the ball than it is to hit down on it creating a bunch of spin. Just my thoughs!

909 D3 with Diamana White X
909 F3 15degree with Aldila Vodoo
ZM Forged 2-PW
Voley 56 and 60
Studio Newport 1.5 PRo V1X


Posted
Just hit the little ball first. If you making contact with the golf ball before the earth its should be solid contact. I dont think its good advice to hit down on long irons. More like a 3 wood. I agree with TN94z, sweep more than down. I think high handi players who concentrate on hitting down tend to jab straight down and not follow through. Just remember to hit the little ball first and make solid contact. There is a new trend where many pros are trying to take small divots. It may not even be that new but its much easier to be consistant picking the ball than it is to hit down on it creating a bunch of spin. Just my thoughs!

I thought the margin for error was so much greater when hitting down into the ball. I have never met a scratch golfer who doesn't take a good divot.

Brian


Posted
I agree with you Leftygolfer. If you notice on tour, those guys take huge divots due to the steep swing they take at hitting down on the ball. Even with those long irons. Irons are "digger" clubs. Woods are "sweeper" clubs.

  • Moderator
Posted
I agree with you Leftygolfer. If you notice on tour, those guys take huge divots due to the steep swing they take at hitting down on the ball. Even with those long irons. Irons are "digger" clubs. Woods are "sweeper" clubs.

You don't want your long irons digging in though. They are not necessarily a "sweeping" club but they "sweep" more than your mid-short irons.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I read something to this effect in Tiger Woods - How I Play Golf. He teaches w/ the 3/4 iron to sweep the ball and make sure on the backswing that you take it inside your target line. That really helped me because I was getting too steep on my long irons. But basically anything 5I and below I'm concentraiting on a decending blow.

In my Titleist Premium Stand Bag

909D3 8.5 VS Proto 70 X
909 f2 13.5 V2 75 x
G10 15 Degree Grafalloy Red X MP-32 3-pw X100 Vokey Spin 52, 56 SS Newport 2 Pro V1


Posted
I thought the margin for error was so much greater when hitting down into the ball. I have never met a scratch golfer who doesn't take a good divot.

I do see some pros, definitely not all taking big divots and I do at times also. If your trying to put a bunch of spin on a short iron hitting down on it creating a big divot is the way to go. I get myself in a lot of trouble by spinning the ball too much. Im not making an argument against divots, but when Im hitting my wedges bad my divots are HUGH!!!

PS....I play with several scratch golfers who dont make much of a divot at all.

909 D3 with Diamana White X
909 F3 15degree with Aldila Vodoo
ZM Forged 2-PW
Voley 56 and 60
Studio Newport 1.5 PRo V1X


Posted
Geoff Ogilvy is a good example of this. He hardly takes a divot on this short irons/wedge and no divot on mid-long irons. One announcer made the comment of him being a course superintendent’s best friend.

In my Titleist Premium Stand Bag

909D3 8.5 VS Proto 70 X
909 f2 13.5 V2 75 x
G10 15 Degree Grafalloy Red X MP-32 3-pw X100 Vokey Spin 52, 56 SS Newport 2 Pro V1


Posted
I do see some pros, definitely not all taking big divots and I do at times also. If your trying to put a bunch of spin on a short iron hitting down on it creating a big divot is the way to go. I get myself in a lot of trouble by spinning the ball too much. Im not making an argument against divots, but when Im hitting my wedges bad my divots are HUGH!!!

I see alot of pros take very noticiable divots with there long irons (I am thinking tiger in particular).

There is a big difference between not taking a divot and not taking much of one. Your friends not take much of one, but I am sure they are taking small ones and hitting there shots with a decending blow. I know for a fact there is more room for error with a decending blow. A little thin and you will be ok. If you are sweeper, a little thin is going to be really really bad. A little fat is the same case. You would come up short still but not nearly as short if you typically sweep the ball and hit is fat. This is something I am trying to change about my swing. I know my iron play will get better if I take more of a divot. I had a lesson last night. This is something I am really trying to work on. I noticied when I took a divot the not one ball had any hook on it. When I didn't and I hit it with a sweeping motion I would hit it right with a hook.

Brian


Posted
You should swing every club the same (obviously not the putter). What exactly is a long iron? You play your longer irons up a little farther in your stance which then makes impact a little more at the end of downswing. So you are actually not hitting down as much, but not because you change your swing or even swing thought, but because it is further up in your stance.

  • Moderator
Posted
I see alot of pros take very noticiable divots with there long irons (I am thinking tiger in particular).

I also see alot of pros not taking noticeable divots. You are hitting down on the long irons even if you are sweeping them a bit, otherwise why don't you take a big divots like you do with your SW? I hardly ever take a big divot with my long irons but I am still hitting down on them. You are basically making the same swing throughout but there is no way that the club is doing the same thing because it is longer.

Hitting down on the ball does not necessarily mean less room for error. What if you hit down 2 inches behind the ball (fat)? How much distance do you lose with a fat shot? What if you hit the top of the ball on a descending blow (topped shot)? What will happen then? I think it is just all part of your natural swing. Just because golfer A takes a big divot with his 3I doesn't mean that golfer B needs to do the same. If you are hooking the ball it is not necessarily because you didn't take a divot. I can take a big divot and the ball goes straight or I can barely touch the turf and the balls goes straight.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You should swing every club the same (obviously not the putter). What exactly is a long iron? You play your longer irons up a little farther in your stance which then makes impact a little more at the end of downswing. So you are actually not hitting down as much, but not because you change your swing or even swing thought, but because it is further up in your stance.

Exactly. It is only a ball difference in position comparing a 3 iron to a 9 iron. Maybe a ball and half.

Brian


Note: This thread is 6073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.