Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4863 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
These things are top quality. Perfectly flush ferrules, no epoxy residue to be found, perfectly lined up shafts and grips. The club heads themselves are attractive, with understated black and silver medallions in the cavity.

I'll take some high quality pics when I get home if anyone is interested.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
These things are top quality. Perfectly flush ferrules, no epoxy residue to be found, perfectly lined up shafts and grips. The club heads themselves are attractive, with understated black and silver medallions in the cavity.

Any chance you can demo some G10s alongside the P2s and then report back?


Posted
I could. Golf Galaxy has the G10s for demo.

I don't think that would accomplish much right now though. I'm really pretty bad. I just started a couple of weeks ago.

I do have some lessons coming up, and I intend to do a lot of playing. So maybe in a couple of months I'll do exactly that.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
I'm not sure if these clubs are awesome or my old clubs were really awful, but I just got back from the range and had the best session I've had yet. 3/4 of the balls I hit went long and straight and I only topped a small handful. I hit the green at 100 yards 3 times in a row with my 9. I hit about a dozen balls with the 3h and 4 of them went 175 or more. I haven't been able to hit that far with anything yet.

Can't wait to take these on the course. I'll take some pics shortly.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted

Here we go.


























The hybrid was hit at the range today, hence the scratches. It was pristine and shrinkwrapped when I opened the box.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
Good looking clubs!

Be forewarned, a lot of people on this forum are biased against clones. Glad to hear they're working out for you.

Posted
Good looking clubs!

Oh I know. I expect that it's even worse in real life, as internet forums tend to be a little biased the other way. They can get over it while I spend the $500+ I saved on lessons and greens fees!

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I started playing a month ago. Had Slazenger Raw Distance 2008 PW-5iron, 3-4 hybrid Raw Distance, 3 wood Lynx, Driver Raw Distance Driver 13 degree, Snake Eyes 60 degree wedge, 54 degree MacGregor sand wedge.

I replace LW, SW-5 irons with GigaGolf P2 irons and added a P2 2i Hybrid to my existing clubs. +.5 length, +2 degree lie. Firm flex shaft irons, Stiff Hybrid shafts, and regular flex woods.

I played a round today.....improvement big time in ball striking off the ground.
I even got the 2 hybrid off the ground. I really think the +2 degree lie made a difference. Also, I like the Temper Feather lite shafts and it seems going with Standard grips instead of midsize helped with turning my hands over.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Just got my Cloud 9 Ti driver (Ping Rapture clone) from them. I got it -.75" to bring the length down to 44.5". Very attractive club. Not crazy about the 2' long sock on the headcover though.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
I like those better than the PINGs.

:tmade: R15 14* Matrix Black Tie 7m3

:adams: Speedline Super S 3w & 5w Matrix Radix HD S VI

:callaway: X-12 4-PW Memphis 10

IONNOVEX  Type S GDT 50*, 54* & 62* Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage Black 80ir

:odyssey: Tri-Ball SRT

-Landon


Posted
Have you taken them to a shop and demoed agains the G10s just to see what difference, if any, there is?

FTi 10* Draw w/ ProLaunch Blue 65g Stiff
5 Wood
Walter Hagen Ultradyne Blades 3-PW
52*
X-Tour Vintage 56.13 X-Forged Chrome 64.09 Dual Force BladeBall: B330Rx or Pro V1


Posted
Have you taken them to a shop and demoed agains the G10s just to see what difference, if any, there is?

No, not yet. Probably later this year or next year. I just don't have enough experience hitting anything at this point to be able to really tell the difference - and since I started taking lessons two weeks ago I can't seem to hit anything at all!

Definitely in the cards though.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


  • 9 months later...
Posted
I hit some G15s at a Ping demo day last week. Seemed identical to me.

In other news, I got the C9 5w fairway wood in today. I got it with a ProLaunch Blue 75. The club is fantastic. I hit it off the tee all day and averaged 190 yards dead straight. Really impressed with it.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
I'm looking into some GigaGolf GX922's. I'm a beginner just learning the game and am currently hacking around on some Titliest DCI 990 player clubs. I'm hoping that downgrading to some GI's for a season or two will help me progress a little more quickly. I don't want to spend an arm and a leg as I know I'll be going back to the 990's in a few years. From everything Ive seen and heard GigaGolf has gone from clone company to an established top quality club maker...

Posted
Eh, they're a clone manufacturer. The clubs are very well-produced, they have great shaft and customizing options, and they have a slick web site with good selection, but in the end they're still clone clubs. You're not about to see any at the US Open qualifiers ;)

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Posted
Clone clubs aren't a terrible idea, as long as you know what you are buying. Clone clubs are reverse engineered from the actual clubs they replicate. Unlike the original manufacturer, who engineers thicknesses, materials, mechanical properties, etc of the steel, elastomer and other; clone clubs simply copy the overall dimension and reproduce the club within approximations of size and shape. Less thought is given to materials, thicknesses and mechanical qualities. You get clubs that look like the real thing, provide a majority of the performance at a fraction of the cost.

Is it worth it? For players like nuck81 with something to grow into, I think so. Just be sure that clubhead weight (g) is close to real clubs, and make sure you spring for a good quality shaft. If you cut corners on shafts, you are really asking for trouble.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
CYou get clubs that look like the real thing, provide ~70% of the performance, and cost ~30% of the original.

Let's not make up statistics.

C9 VFT Ti
C9 5w
P2 Hybrid 3
P2 Deep Cavity 4-PW
SGS 52, 56 Putter


Note: This thread is 4863 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
    • Wordle 1,817 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.