Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6042 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I ended up in a bunker today on two separate occassions. It was at a course I've never played at, my home course doesn't have bunkers so I don't have much experience with these shots.

I was in a bunker in front of the green today, probably had 7 yards to the pin with the edge of the bunker about a yard in front of me and the lip about a foot above my ball.

So I take my 60* wedge, open the face way up, open may stance, take my stance, all that stuff(I've know my setup is good) and take about a 1/2 swing and the ball plops right in front of me again. I hit about an inch and a half behind the ball(which is recommended if I remember right).

I did this a 2nd time again, 3rd time I finally got it out with a full swing about 2 yards past the hole, so I guess it went 9-10 yards from where I hit it.

Is this about the distance I can expect a 60* wedge(opened all the way up) to go from a bunker?

I don't ever get to practice these shots so I have to do my best just to avoid bunkers at all costs when playing at courses that have them(which is not real often).

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
is your ball position towards the front foot and the weight on your front foot? practice sand shots at your local course or nearby beach, any beaches in South Dakota? then local golf course.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
I think it's something you may have to practice a bit. I would also suggest looking at the ball position. It should be up front. However, I've found on uphill bunker shots I actually need to play the ball *back* in my stance. Haven't really understood why it works, but it does. The other thing is that you need to follow through with a bunker shot, many amateurs don't do that. You may also have the face a bit too far open.

But again, I suggest trying to get some bunker practice in so you can figure out what works and what does not work with you.




3JACK

Posted
yep, definitely takes some practice. being close to the lip could make things more difficult too, but it sounds like the lip didn't come into play? but yeah, if the sand is light and fluffy you do need to hit pretty hard to power the ball out of it. if the sand is less fluffy ya don't need to hit it nearly as hard though. you'll need to feel how fluffy the sand is when you step in it and if you have a further shot, you may want to use less loft than 60*. i've not actually hit a 60 from the sand, i normally use a 52, and if it is a greenside bunker that is further from the green will sometimes hit pw if it is real fluffy stuff.

was that a real dog?


Posted
It sounds to me like you aren't accelerating through the ball. On explosion sand shots like what you'd hit in that situation, you have to swing hard and trust that you aren't going to hit the ball 50 yards past the hole. If you second-guess in the slightest bit and back off, you'll hit right in front of you just like you did. One thing that helps with this is making sure your finish is high and that you swing all the way through. This helps in making yourself not decelerate.

Posted

You are right, I did do that the first time now that I think about it.

is your ball position towards the front foot and the weight on your front foot? practice sand shots at your local course or nearby beach, any beaches in South Dakota? then local golf course.

Sorry, forgot to mention that. Yes, ball position was up in my stance, inside my left foot, with weight on my left side at impact. No beaches around here, maybe I'll get to the course one of these days when it's not busy so I can practice.

Thanks for the tips everybody.

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That full swing you took sounds about right. When you open a 60* way up, you won't get much distance. I prefer to open it about 40*. I usually use about a 3/4 swing and one of the important things is to continue the follow-through, don't stop in the sand. That will force you to come at it a bit more shallow, which is probably what happened to the first few (too steep a swing). It still needs to be steeper than a regular shot, just not TOO steep.

There is no way to judge the distance the ball will fly without practicing it. It's an entirely new club in your bag basically. It would be like buying a 73* wedge and then not practicing it until you get onto the course... then try to guess how far it will fly.

So get an hour or two of practice and you should be good. Remember, hitting a consistent distance behind the ball is the key.

If you have really long bunker shots (over about 15 yards), I usually club down to using a 56* or even a 52* and sometimes even a PW (when it's like 40 yards from fluffy sand).

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour


Posted
Not to hijack this thread, but what is the best way to play a bunker shot when the sand is not fluffy? btw great info so far!

in hard sand, i play it like i'm chipping a normal shot from a bad lie. hit down on the ball, and just pretend its not sand, with the ball in the middle to the back of your stance. but don't hit it too hard, or you'll fly the green.


Note: This thread is 6042 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.