Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
A lot of my chip shots are hitting the bottom of the club face and are just rocketing across the green (rather than heading up in the air). I hit my chips with a sand wedge (all I have besides a PW that's not good on chips) and I suspect that part of my issues stem from the bounce of the club. I try to get down and under the ball but my club just doesn't seem to get under it. But then again, it seems that lots of folks chip with a SW as well. And buying another wedge is NOT an option for me.

What could help me hit chips and approaches like I'm supposed to? Am I not hitting down on the ball enough? Do I need to move it back in my stance?

Thanks for your help! My short game is a mess right now.

Posted
Here's how I hit my chips, and the short game is by far the best part of my game:
-Weight a little bit forward on my left foot (as a Righty).
-Hands SLIGHTLY forward, not too much though...this will help you strike down on the ball.
-Ball off my back right BIG TOE (trying to be specific here, haha).
-And lastly, but BY FAR most importantly, keep your head down .

Give this a try if you don't already do it. I chip with a 56 degree sand wedge with 14 bounce, so I highly doubt it's the bounce of the club, rather your technique.

Good Luck.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


  • Moderator
Posted
dido - weight & hands forward, ball back, head down

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
try the following for solid contact:

1) chip like you putt with the shaft vertical and with your putting stroke, ball back in your stance.
2) ball back in your stance, start with the ball behind your back foot so that you will have a decending approach to the ball.
3) hand close to the body and extended to the ground but relaxed
4) forward press with your hands close to the front leg
5) expect the ball to roll
6) practice until you make solid consistent contact and not hitting thin
7) watch the pros on tv
8) watch some instructional videos on the web
9) practice for at least 30 minutes everyday for a month

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
I forget which online video it was but my chipping got much better when I started looking at the the front of the ball. I also stopped trying to "sweep" the ball with the wedge(52-56-60 degree) doesn't matter. I still contact the ball with a descending blow. My chipping saves me 7-9 strokes per round.

These chips are where a good swing and contact come into play. It's up close and personal and much less forgiving.

Odyssey white Hot 2 ball cut down to 29"

Cobra ZL 9.5 driver
Adams Speedline 3W 13*
TourEdge Bazooka 20* hybrid
Powerbilt forged combo 3-PW
Ping Tour S 52 and 56 wedges


Posted
Thanks guys.

Now, should I be playing the ball back in my stance and trying to strike down on it when I am chipping and I have a nice lie on a fairway, as well? Or does that only apply to chipping on the rough?

Posted
Thanks guys.

I'm not a big advocate of putting the ball back in the stance, I think the weight forward technique is enough of a "cheat" to make sure to hit down on the ball - that being said a lot of people like putting it back there so it obviously works for some -

now, that being said, i think its even more important to hit down on the ball, however you do it, in the fairway as opposed to the rough - in the rough around the greens you'll often have a "fluffy" lie allowing you to get away with more around the greens, making a good downward strike is more important on tight lies on the fairway or a shortly mowed fringe I'll also use this post to recommend Phil Mickelson's "secrets to the short game" DVDs - they are pretty cheap on Amazon. The chipping portion of the DVD is the best part of it - its kept simple and to the point as a disclaimer, I'm obviously not a very good golfer as illustrated by my handicap, but the better players I play with, single digit guys, say that my chipping is more advanced than the rest of my game, and they often want me and my handicap on their teams because of how I get around near the greens
In the bag:
Driver - FT-9 10* Stock Stiff Fujikura
3Wood - X 3W Stock Stiff Callaway Graphite Shaft
Hybrids - X Hybrids 21*, 24*, 27* uniflex steel shaft
Irons - X-22 irons 6-PW uniflex steel shaftWedges - X Forged Chrome Wedges: 52*, 56*, 60*Putter - White Hot XG #9Ball - Tour ix or TP...

Posted

I agree with Bigboys advice and want to add something, as far as ball positioning goes. On a short chip, it may appear as though the ball is far back in the stance but with an open stance and feet closer together but relative to the spine, the ball may actually still be center stance or a half or one ball back of center, relative to the spine. No matter the shot, you don't really want to change the ball position much except when teed up for the driver.

You can strike down on the ball no matter where it is positioned in the stance. Try not to change another variable in this game that doesn't need changing. It's hard enough, as is!
Thanks guys.

Odyssey white Hot 2 ball cut down to 29"

Cobra ZL 9.5 driver
Adams Speedline 3W 13*
TourEdge Bazooka 20* hybrid
Powerbilt forged combo 3-PW
Ping Tour S 52 and 56 wedges


Posted
Thanks guys.

It depends, really. If you want to get a little more height, I play it center. If I'm bringing it a little lower with spin, back in my stance so I can make sure I strike the ball first.

It really all depends on what kind of shot, to be honest.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
Here's something else to ponder, which might not apply to you. My brother in law and playing partner, tops or skulls most of the iron or wedge shots. What he does is, he shifts weight back on the back swing and never shifts weight back forward on the downswing. Because of this flaw in his swing, he has to use a long tee to tee the ball up high for his driver so he does not top it.

The problem translates to every shot except putter. To try to combat this bad habit in his swing, I have had him turn his back foot in. He is a lefty so he turns his left foot inward which inhibits him from shifting weight too much back. Since he started doing this, every club has improved. He is getting under and hitting down on his iron and wedges and has started to tee his driver down to more human levels.

Odyssey white Hot 2 ball cut down to 29"

Cobra ZL 9.5 driver
Adams Speedline 3W 13*
TourEdge Bazooka 20* hybrid
Powerbilt forged combo 3-PW
Ping Tour S 52 and 56 wedges


Posted
Use your hips and chest to hit the ball. It will give the clubhead enough weight to come nicely through the ball with a high launch. Could also be you are trying to lift the ball. Don't to that. Let the loft take care of that job. Your job is to let the body turn down and through the ball. Picture the center of the face of the club passing right throughthe ball and further down.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.