Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

hit some irons on launch monitor today


Note: This thread is 5997 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
i have never really played on the launch monitor too much at stores. I was at Golf Galaxy yesterday hitting some 7 irons (Titleist AP2 and Mizuno MP-62). I was actually hitting them both about the same. On good solid hits I was carrying them about 150 and roll out to around 160-165.

But the most interesting thing to me was the ball and club speed. My club speed was about 75mph on average and the ball was around 105mph.

I have never really paid too much attention to this stuff in the past. But I always thought 100mph was a good club speed? Is that for drivers Im assuming? Is 75mph on irons a good speed?

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
The shorter the club, the lower your swing speed.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT


Posted
yep grab some regular shafts and your good to go

driver. taylormade tour burner tp ust avixcore tour green 75 x
3 wood 909 f3 13* voodo xnv8
3 hybrid adams idea pro vs proto 95x
irons 3 no 4 5-pw nike cci forged blades
gap wedge nike sv tour blacksand wedge cg14 56* 14flopadopolous vokey spin milled 64 7putter scotty cameron classics newport...


Posted
yep grab some regular shafts and your good to go

all mine are stiff

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
What's your driver SS? Shaft flex depends on several factors including swing speed and tempo.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT


Posted
i honestly dont know, didnt hit a driver. im curious though now

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
yep grab some regular shafts and your good to go

Hes right 15 yards of roll is way too much with a 7 iron


Posted
well those were rough estimates, each may vary a little. but how accurate are those things anyway

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
I don't really trust anything but distance in a launch monitor, and even then it's questionable. They don't take slices or hooks in effect, just off line shots (for example my slice starts straight enough but about 100 yards out is where it gets messy). So in theory I could swing as hard as I can in a launch monitor and, as long as I hit the center of the screen, I'm sending it right down the middle of the fairway. In real life however, a swing like that would send the ball 150 yards out and 150 yards to the left.

Also for some reason my swing speed never changes on certain clubs no matter how light or hard I swing. I don't know exactly why this is, but I think it may be because the swing speed can only be judged on ball contact so the computer is estimating the swing speed base on your ball speed. The launch monitor i use also doesn't give me any roll on my driver. I think it's because the roll is based on trajectory and how high it hits on the screen. So if I hit a "higher" drive, it doesn't give me the roll I would really get.

Now this monitor may be in the minority, but I never trust what the results in there are. I think that they're somewhat of a marketing ploy to sell clubs. Just like the putting greens in shops all break towards the holes and the lips slope inward.

l Bag l TaylorMade Stand Bag

l Driver l TaylorMade '07 Burner 9.5* l 3-Wood l Titleist 910F 15* (D1 shaft setting)

l Hybrids l TaylorMade '07 Burner 19* : TaylorMade '10 Rescue 22*

l Irons l TaylorMade r7 5-PW l Wedges l Titleist Bob Vokey 52* 56* 60*

l Putter l Scotty Cameron California Del Mar 34" l Balls l TaylorMade Penta TP


Posted
I don't really trust anything but distance in a launch monitor, and even then it's questionable. They don't take slices or hooks in effect, just off line shots (for example my slice starts straight enough but about 100 yards out is where it gets messy). So in theory I could swing as hard as I can in a launch monitor and, as long as I hit the center of the screen, I'm sending it right down the middle of the fairway. In real life however, a swing like that would send the ball 150 yards out and 150 yards to the left.

Yeah-they're fun, and certainly give you more info than hitting into a net, but far from completely accurate or representative of what your shot would be on a golf course. They love to read a bunch of backspin into my drives, and while it's usually relatively accurate on full iron shots, my distance disappears when I go to lower lofted woods/hybrids, at least in comparison to my real-life distances.


Posted
I don't really trust anything but distance in a launch monitor, and even then it's questionable. They don't take slices or hooks in effect, just off line shots (for example my slice starts straight enough but about 100 yards out is where it gets messy). So in theory I could swing as hard as I can in a launch monitor and, as long as I hit the center of the screen, I'm sending it right down the middle of the fairway. In real life however, a swing like that would send the ball 150 yards out and 150 yards to the left.

Ha. I don't know where that store is but it sucks. None of the stores like Golf Galaxy, or Alfs, or The Golf Guys have anything near that crap. The launch monitors aren't 100% accurate, or even 90% accurate. But, they do give a good estimate that lets you know where you're standing in factors such as swing speed, ball speed, spin rate, launch angle, and carry distance. Those are key factors in determining the type of club you want.

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Diablo 9º
2 Hybrid: Callaway Big Bertha Heavenwood
Irons: Nike Slingshot OSS 6-3 iron
          Taylormade Tour Preferred PW-7 iron
Wedges: Cleveland CG14 50º, 54º
              Taylormade RAC 58º
Putter: Ping Darby 32" shaft


 


Note: This thread is 5997 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.