Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5960 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
What is your preference and why? Discuss!

Driver= Titleist 909D3 9.5 deg
3 Wood= Titleist 909F3 15 deg
Hybrid= Adams Idea Pro Black 19 deg
Irons 3-P= Titleist 695 CB
Wedges= Titleist Vokey Spin Mill 54/10, 60/4Putter= Titleist Scotty Cameron Newport 1.5Ball= Titleist ProV1x, NXT Tour


Posted
Both are nice, and feel a little different. I think it's what you're used to. I've always played DG's, so I prefer the feel of them a little more, but I could get used to Project X.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
not a big fan of the rifle shafts; i like the idea of them but playing them im not so hot on.. project x are rifles right haha? i just prefer stepped shafts.. just used to it.. had precision rifle shafts in my older wilson blades but felt they were rather raw feeling compared to the sensicore trutempers i have now... they look cool tho hehe

Putter first 
:titleist: newport 2 oil can
:titleist: 58* SM4
:titleist: 54* SM4
:titleist: 50* SM4
:titleist: 4-pw AP2 project X 6.0
:ping: i20 9.5 TFC Stiff


Posted
i got 5.5 project x on my mizuno. They feel nice at impact and i get the ball flight i want. Its light weight and stiffer tip makes my shots simple and clean.
In my Warbird Hot Stand Bag:

Driver: R9 420cc 9.5° stiff
3 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #3 Stiff
5 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #5 Stiff3 Hybrid: Burner 08 Rescue #3 StiffIrons: MX-25 4-G Project X 5.5SW: CG12 STD bounce 56° Black PearlLW: CG12 STD bounce 60° Black PearlPutter: California...

Posted
This is all just my opinion and experiences...

I prefer the DG. When I was testing clubs last summer I hit PX 5.5 & 6.0, and the DG S-300 & X-100. My old set has DG 300 and while they were fine, I could not swing as hard as I wanted to on certain shots because they would go left. I tested the PX 5.5 and for me and my swing, I could find no difference with the S-300. I know they are supposed to provide different results, but they were the same for me. Same ballflight, trajectory, and same problem going left. I went to the 6.0 and could not hit it. It felt like a lead pipe to me. Everything went low and to the right. Then as a last resort, I hit the X-100 and they were perfect. I would have thought that if I couldn't hit the 6.0, I would not be able to hit the 100, but I would have been wrong. At first I lost some distance with them, but gained the accuracy. After having them in a new set for a year now, the distance has come back,and I am actually a little longer with each club. I attribute that to figuring out my swing with the new clubs and shafts and everything has come together.

Since I have been able to figure out the stiffer shaft I would like to try the PX 6.0 again. I think my results might be a little different. I have a friend who has 6.5's in his clubs and I hit a couple of balls with them and didn't have any problems at all. Who know though. I am real happy with my set up now, so it will probably just wait 6-7 years until I need a new set of clubs.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
I dont have a favorite, but the PX5.5 fit my swing better.

Aerolite III bag
MP600 10.5*
F-50 15*
MP57's Project X 5.5 3-PW
CG10 56* RAC 52* 60* 2 Ball putter ProV1/ProV1X Blackberry Storm GolfLogix


Posted
This is all just my opinion and experiences...

I always wanted to try X100's because I'm kind of in between an S300 and X100. I worry about 3/4 shots and knock down pushing to the right.

Also, how does the additional weight feel. I think I would like that because to me, a heavy club seems to swing itself. Once you find the slot at the top, all you have to do is drop the club to finish.

Driver= Titleist 909D3 9.5 deg
3 Wood= Titleist 909F3 15 deg
Hybrid= Adams Idea Pro Black 19 deg
Irons 3-P= Titleist 695 CB
Wedges= Titleist Vokey Spin Mill 54/10, 60/4Putter= Titleist Scotty Cameron Newport 1.5Ball= Titleist ProV1x, NXT Tour


Posted

funny this thread popped up
i am thinkning of gettin some different shafts for my PC's
they currently have the Nike Speed Step's in them, Reg. Shaft
when i really go at it, i alway miss left, sometimes a draw, sometimes a hook....i never hook
i play a natural fade

now, my 5i ss is approx. 91-94mph, driver is 103-107
according to their website, the 6.0's would fit me best...but would something slightly stiffer than the Reg.s work better? (PJX 5.5's?)
i have a very smooth tempoed swing

i play a DGS300 in my 4w and it feels great

so....im not sure really what to play?
PJX 5.5, PJX 6.0 or DGS300?

any help greatly appreciated

"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I always wanted to try X100's because I'm kind of in between an S300 and X100. I worry about 3/4 shots and knock down pushing to the right.

If you have a good enough swing, it won't make a difference. I did struggle with those shots for a very short time. Once I figured that I had to get my hand through just a little bit faster everything was fine. I would give them a try if you can find one to demo. You might just have to play around with a couple of things to make sure you are getting the club face square.

Also, how does the additional weight feel. I think I would like that because to me, a heavy club seems to swing itself. Once you find the slot at the top, all you have to do is drop the club to finish.

They are actually the same weight as the S-300 so if that is what you have you probably won't notice a difference in weight. The S-400 is the shaft that is heavier. You can tell when you swing them that they are stiffer, but I can't tell any difference in weight.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
i have precision rifle flighted and hit them really high as i bought the set 2nd hand but suited me at the time. I'm getting the new titlist710mb's for my birthday and hoping to get the dynamic gold tour issue in them

In my bag:-

Driver:R7 425 8.5*Graffaloy Blue Tour Stiff

3 Wood: 909F2 13* UST Proforce V2 X-Stiff 92g 1.8* torque5 Wood 909F2 18* Matrix Ozic x-con 6 X-StiffIrons: : 710 mb 3-PW +.75'' 2* up with DG X100 Wedges: spin milled 52* and 60*Putter: Newport 2 35''


Posted
I always wanted to try X100's because I'm kind of in between an S300 and X100. I worry about 3/4 shots and knock down pushing to the right.

i did this with my new irons, i was right between the s300 and x100 and went with the x100 because the just felt like they swung themselves. 3/4 shots were not really a problem just dont try to rush it unless you have strong forearms or you will block/shank in a heart beat. I had to learn this the hard way because i love playing half shots and working the ball and what not. but i say if you even close i would play the x100. My 6 iron club head is in the mid/upper 90's if its any help to compare to what you may need. but DG and PX are really two different shafts i dont know why people keep trying to compare them.

DG=low launch high spin PX=high launch low spin

Driver: 09 Burner 10.5 Aldila NV 65 X Stiff
3wd: G10 14* Aldila NV 85 X Stiff
Hybrid: G10 18* Aldila NV 105 X Stiff
3-PW: I10 X100
Wedge: Tour 52* & 58* S400Putter: Circa 62 No.2 35" Ball: Tour IXLowest 9 (-E) 36Lowest 18 (+2) 73


Posted
i did this with my new irons, i was right between the s300 and x100 and went with the x100 because the just felt like they swung themselves. 3/4 shots were not really a problem just dont try to rush it unless you have strong forearms or you will block/shank in a heart beat. I had to learn this the hard way because i love playing half shots and working the ball and what not. but i say if you even close i would play the x100. My 6 iron club head is in the mid/upper 90's if its any help to compare to what you may need. but DG and PX are really two different shafts i dont know why people keep trying to compare them.

I naturally have a quicker tempo. I've always felt like I've had to pace my swing to keep it from going left. It'd be nice to have a shaft that I know I could swing aggressive with and fire my right side as hard as I want.

I have the same 6I swing specs as you. I carry my 6I approximately 180 yards and have a driver swing speed of 110 with a carry of 270 yards. I'm now convinced I should be OK with X100's. I think people compare PX and DG's because low handicap players both tend to be drawn to them because manufacturers try to push both on these types of players. Thanks.

Driver= Titleist 909D3 9.5 deg
3 Wood= Titleist 909F3 15 deg
Hybrid= Adams Idea Pro Black 19 deg
Irons 3-P= Titleist 695 CB
Wedges= Titleist Vokey Spin Mill 54/10, 60/4Putter= Titleist Scotty Cameron Newport 1.5Ball= Titleist ProV1x, NXT Tour


Posted
I tried Royal Precision rifle 5.0 in some Callaway X20s, and also in the stock Uniflex. The 5.0 had a slightly lower trajectory. Other than that, not much difference.

RP also puts out flighted rifle shafts, but I'm not sure what those are supposed to do. Also, not all Royal Precision shafts were Project X, at least in the 2008 time frame.

In the Dynamic Gold family, the DG SLs are worth noting if you want lighter weight. The SL shafts average only about 100 grams, rather than 120 or so for most Royal Precision and other DGs.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
funny this thread popped up

no one, really?

"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
i did this with my new irons, i was right between the s300 and x100 and went with the x100 because the just felt like they swung themselves. 3/4 shots were not really a problem just dont try to rush it unless you have strong forearms or you will block/shank in a heart beat. I had to learn this the hard way because i love playing half shots and working the ball and what not. but i say if you even close i would play the x100. My 6 iron club head is in the mid/upper 90's if its any help to compare to what you may need. but DG and PX are really two different shafts i dont know why people keep trying to compare them.

Agreed, I think they have a totally different feel and create significantly different results. I've played for long periods with X100s and PX 6.5s. I like them both, but they are totally different.

The PXs seem to make the ball float on forever, with a sort of lazy curve if you hit either a draw or fade. To me, I think they are best suited for "point and shoot" type of golf where you keep things simple and try to bomb every shot high and straight at the flag. The X100s seem like more of a "shotmaker's" shaft. You can hit drastically different shots with different swings: high cuts, low draws, high draws, and everything in between. They definitely seem to spin more. I might be overstating the difference a little bit, but I really think it's pretty substantial.
Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Posted
So If looking to "eventually, down the road" try working the ball more, you suggest DG shafts??

I just played around with the mp57's both with S300 and 5.5 shafts. I liked the PX Shafts a lot, but I was hitting into a net so I dont know what the ball flight looked like, but if working the ball is not really an option with the PX, why do so many guys playing the MP line of mizuno use these shafts?

Jim

In my Ogio Blade Stand Bag:
 

TaylorMade Burner 10.5*

Adams Insight BUL 15*
Taylormade RBZ 3H

TaylorMade RBZ 4-AW

Vokey SM4 54-11

Cleveland CG14 58 2 dot wedge

Ping Karsten Series Craz-E putter

Top Flite Gamer


Posted
So If looking to "eventually, down the road" try working the ball more, you suggest DG shafts??

A lot of people think low spin is a good thing. It's easier to control, you are less likely to over-do a draw or fade, and some people think it makes the ball cut through the wind better. You can still work the ball a ton, I just think the ball "wants" to behave more like I described in my first post. Phil Mickelson for instance, uses PXs, as do a lot of other pros who work the ball regularly.

Personally, I think I play better with PXs because I tend to get more unintentional sidespin with X100s, but it's not a huge difference.
Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Note: This thread is 5960 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.