Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5888 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm contemplating getting this done for my clubs.

Does anyone have firsthand experience with SST PUREing and think that it was useful or made a difference?

What are people's opinions on PUREing shafts?

Thanks,
Alan
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
I'm contemplating getting this done for my clubs.

I will get my graphite shafts sst/pured when I buy them from Golfsmith b/c it only costs 12 bux per shaft. For my iron shafts I just use my spine finder that I put together. (You can go on the internet and look under "spine finder" I believe and there are a couple. I made mine for under 5 bux, but doesn't work for graphite, lol, I broke 2 graphite shafts learning that.)

Now as for how usefull spining or for that fact, sst/pure is a on going debate. It is my understanding that spining and sst/pure are pretty much the same, but the sst/pure will give you more numbers and is much more accurate b/c it is done by a computer. Also, when I put in my spined shafts I put the spine of the shaft at 12:00 o'clock on the head, steel graphite, both the same position and I've had no problems. There are also articles on the internet about spining. My feelings are that if you are a consistant ball striker you will notice a difference. Your dispersion will be tighter and the "feel" between clubs will be a lot the same. It will also really help to weigh your heads and get the 6-8 grams apart. This can be done with lead weights that go into the tip of the shaft. My .02 cents is if you are serious about your game spine the shafts yourself, its not hard at all. If, at this time you aren't a consistant ball striker you will grow into it so the spining won't hurt. As for the launch monitor for a driver/shaft combo for your swing I'd diffinetly wait until you feel you are at least somewhat consistant with your ball striking b/c this can get expensive ---JMHO

Posted
Don't mean to sound rude, but at your level I would spend the money on some lessons instead, it really does not make that big a differnce.

Posted
Don't mean to sound rude, but at your level I would spend the money on some lessons instead, it really does not make that big a differnce.

I agree.

PUREing just gets rid of some on the minor irregularity's in a shaft. Pro's get their shafts puredd because they want to get their shots inch-perfect. It's not worth the money for you.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
I think it does help. But the most important thing in Golf is the mental side. If you believe it is helping it will help.

In the bag-

Driver- Ping Anser 9.5  Diamana Ahina
3 Wood-RBZ tour 15
Hybrid-RBZ tour 4 Irons-  Ping I20s 4-GW with soft stepped X100sWedges 58 and 54 SM4s with soft stepped X100s Putter- Ping TR Senita


Posted
I had my new iron shafts "SST/Pured" as part of custom fitting process I went through with HotStix custom fitters..... I can tell ZERO difference... In fact I ended up hating the shafts they put me into. IMO, even though the numbers and computers may tell you something is ideal, it may really be immaterial to the way you swing or it just may not feel right.
Personally I would not do it again.

Snowman0157
 


Posted
Don't mean to sound rude, but at your level I would spend the money on some lessons instead, it really does not make that big a differnce.

I take lessons once every few months and even my pro says lessons are overrated and he's the one making the dolos. I spend my time practicing. You could take a lesson once a week and it won't do anything... most ppl who take tons of lessons don't practice enough on the side

Plus I have the money so its not an issue. Thanks for your concern
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
For my iron shafts I just use my spine finder that I put together.

Please explain. This is the 1st I've ever heard of working for one and no the other. You must be doing something wrong, seriously. It's easier to use on a graphite shaft than steel and it matters less on steel anyway.

:tmade: R15 14* Matrix Black Tie 7m3

:adams: Speedline Super S 3w & 5w Matrix Radix HD S VI

:callaway: X-12 4-PW Memphis 10

IONNOVEX  Type S GDT 50*, 54* & 62* Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage Black 80ir

:odyssey: Tri-Ball SRT

-Landon


Posted
I just picked up my driver from it getting PURE'd today and headed over to the range....

I don't know if it's just mental but the ball flight was much more consistent and there was no random ball flights going right and left.

I had it installed logo down in the R9 TP position - after PUREing the shaft was installed logo up 7.1* off
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
Maybe I am nuttsssss (which is possible because I am a Marine) but I will not buy shafts unless I get them pured. I can absolutley feel the difference, even more so in my wedges... I play a lot of competative golf so maybe it is just the mental side but I can not play without pured shafts... The only one I use now that is not pured is the new I-Mix Fubuki Tour I am playing but that shaft is the bomb anyways... I would not change it now if someone could pure it for me because I am killing it... Maybe it was just built in the right spot where the spine is at 9 o'clock anyways... Personally, I think it is worth getting them pured...

Posted
I take lessons once every few months and even my pro says lessons are overrated and he's the one making the dolos. I spend my time practicing. You could take a lesson once a week and it won't do anything... most ppl who take tons of lessons don't practice enough on the side

I'm not overly concerned, but I would certainly disagree with your pro. EVERY top player gets lessons/coaching so I wouldn't exactly call it over rated. You do need to put the hours in though, I would say about 70% of the lessons I give is going over old stuff as people just don't practice. I sometimes won't do a lesson unless the person has put a few hours in between sessions, it is just a waste of everyone's time.

As for the op, go and try a Snake Eyes club, they are all pured, I doubt you will notice any different to your own.

Posted
I think it does help. But the most important thing in Golf is the mental side. If you believe it is helping it will help.

I agree with this statement and is one of the reasons why I've have several of my clubs SST Pured and personally I didn't think it was that much more to spend

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Maybe I am nuttsssss (which is possible because I am a Marine) but I will not buy shafts unless I get them pured. I can absolutley feel the difference, even more so in my wedges... I play a lot of competative golf so maybe it is just the mental side but I can not play without pured shafts... The only one I use now that is not pured is the new I-Mix Fubuki Tour I am playing but that shaft is the bomb anyways... I would not change it now if someone could pure it for me because I am killing it... Maybe it was just

Is 9 o'clock the best spot? I would think 12 or 6 would be ideal, but I really don't have a clue. Why do you line it up at 9?

Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Posted
Please explain. This is the 1st I've ever heard of working for one and no the other. You must be doing something wrong, seriously. It's easier to use on a graphite shaft than steel and it matters less on steel anyway.

My spine finder is a 1 1/4" plastic T with encased bearings at both ends. These are metal and when one puts graphite in and puts a load on the shaft there are only 2 places where the shaft rotates on metal bearing. This puts the force on very small parts of the graphite shaft, which in turn press down and put weak spots in the shaft and eventually break it. That is why I don't spine my graphite shafts with that spine finder. I've read some stuff about spining graphite shafts by putting a load on and rolling them on something narrow.

As for the steel, it depends on the make of shaft. It really matters on DG shafts. I've found that there spines are all over the place. Not a really big deal with PX or KBS b/c the spines are very subtle. Well, at least thats what I've found so far.

Posted
Is 9 o'clock the best spot? I would think 12 or 6 would be ideal, but I really don't have a clue. Why do you line it up at 9?

I put all of my spines, graphite or steel are at 12:00 o'clock on the club head.

There are articles on the internet about positioning, but IMO the 9:00 o'clock and 3:00 o'clock positions are more theroy than practicality. But go read them and see what you think. I also think too many ppl think that spining will improve their golf game, and for the consistant striker, probably. In reality all its going to do is make your dispersion tighter. I really notice it with my scoring clubs. However, if one isn't a consistant striker there will not be any change. Maybe the clubs will feel more consistant thru the set, but thats about it. If I had to pay for pulling the shafts, spining them and having them put back into the heads I wouldn't do it b/c just pulling and putting shafts back in costs too much. Which is why I work on my own equipment. I've really be able to cut costs in some areas, this being one and it isn't that tough, well personal opinion.

Posted
So i've had the driver that I PURE'd for a week now and I've played three rounds and have spent about 15 hours on the range with it; I must say there is a difference. I originally had the spine in the 6 'o' clock position (logo down) and the shaft PURE'd with the logo up, 7.1* rotated.

My misses are much more consistent - if I'm missing right on a string of drives at the range, they will miss right pretty consistently with the same trajectory. Nothing feels as random as it used to. I figure it may be a noticeable difference because the shaft was almost in the complete opposite orientation previously.

Also, I meant to take a picture of the sign at the store, but my phone didn't save the pic for some reason. Pete's Golf Shop in Mineola had a sign posted that stated they had a source intimate to Tiger who was able to confirm that two sets of Tiger's clubs were SST PURE'd and when blind tested, Tiger picked the two sets that were PURE'd - they also requested that any customers with questions about this to ask. I'll take a pic of it next time I head over...

Just some info..
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
If I had to pay for pulling the shafts, spining them and having them put back into the heads I wouldn't do it b/c just pulling and putting shafts back in costs too much.

That's exactly what I think, too. I paid to get my driver spined because I was putting in a new shaft, anyway. It's nice, but it doesn't seem essential. Maybe some day I'll figure out clubmaking as a hobby and just do it myself.

Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Note: This thread is 5888 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.