Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Mickelson, Harrington, Daly using PING wedges for grooves. Unfair advantage?


Note: This thread is 5786 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Comments like that make no sense to me. Golf requires more skill now. Spinning a ball backwards stopped being exciting... what... 15 years ago?

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. Golf was getting to the point where actual shotmaking was totally irrelevant. The courses kept getting longer and longer, and the scores lower and lower. Guys like Tiger and Seve play the game like it should be played, with creativity and daring. They represent a player who can get into trouble and get out with nary a scratch. Guys like Toms and Furyk represented the other side, consistent like the tortoise in the fable, sticking it out. The problem is, you have these guys now who can't chip or putt very well, who just blast the ball as far as they can, then gouge it onto the green. Guys like Quiros, D. Johnson, and Holmes. They will now be forced to rely on creativity and shotmaking. If they can't do it, they won't win.


  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
What a petulant brat Phil is to try and intimidate others into silence on this issue by calling the cheater comment 'slanderous', that's pathetic. Everyone knows what the intent of the new rule is, to limit spin and try and reshape the game a bit, why does Phil think he's not covered by this. So what if it is a technicality, Phil sounds all lawyered up on this. I suppose he's doing this to make a point on behalf of Callaway about their grooves not being allowed, he's really thumbing his nose at the Tour . . . clearly he's not above this type of childishness. The comments some have made about 'playing for a living' justifying him trying to get an unfair advantage . . . come on, Phil is hardly playing for a living, he's playing for Callaway on this issue.

Can anyone who really knew the older players like Palmer/Nicklaus/Watson etc. even remotely imagine that they would stoop this low, exploit this technicality, and exhibit what is at best very poor sportsmanship? Not a chance, it's called integrity. Phil shouldn't have been called a cheater, but his integrity should be questioned here. I don't think he's getting much of an advantage but he is very clearly thinking more about Callaway than his fellow competitors. Is he being silly . . . yes, and he's insulting our intelligence by the way he's 'spinning' this. Just when I was ready to spend the year following Phil and rooting for him to be #1 he shanks it and reveals poor character, what a shame to start the year this way.

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1


Posted
What a petulant brat Phil is to try and intimidate others into silence on this issue by calling the cheater comment 'slanderous', that's pathetic.

Calling him a cheater probably is slanderous if you aren't careful how you state it. If I were serious about my reputation and someone accused me of cheating when I was completely within the rules, I'd be pissed too.

Can anyone who really knew the older players like Palmer/Nicklaus/Watson etc. even remotely imagine that they would stoop this low, exploit this technicality, and exhibit what is at best very poor sportsmanship? Not a chance, it's called integrity. Phil shouldn't have been called a cheater, but his integrity should be questioned here. I don't think he's getting much of an advantage but he is very clearly thinking more about Callaway than his fellow competitors. Is he being silly . . . yes, and he's insulting our intelligence by the way he's 'spinning' this. Just when I was ready to spend the year following Phil and rooting for him to be #1 he shanks it and reveals poor character, what a shame to start the year this way.

The rules are as they're written. Taking advantage of the rules displays intelligence, not lack of integrity. Lack of integrity would be modifying a club and hoping no one noticed. Questioning anyone's integrity here is way out of line. If there's an advantage with the old wedges, it's available to anyone in the field who can find an old wedge on ebay. As for this business about thinking about Callaway... uh, what? That doesn't even make sense. The rule is completely clear: those clubs are permitted. There's no need to contemplate what the authors were trying to do, it's unimportant, just as, e.g., it doesn't matter WHY you're allowed to drop on the far side of a lateral hazard if it's to your advantage to do so.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
This is the point to this whole conversation! Phil nor anyone else would be playing those clubs if they did not have the grooves, plain enough. Look how old the club is... They are ugly as heck also and so now, after the PGA changes a rule to change grooves he goes and gets one and plays it now... Come on dude... I would not say that he is cheating but everyone can see that he is playing the club because of the loop hole!

Posted
This is the point to this whole conversation! Phil nor anyone else would be playing those clubs if they did not have the grooves, plain enough. Look how old the club is... They are ugly as heck also and so now, after the PGA changes a rule to change grooves he goes and gets one and plays it now... Come on dude... I would not say that he is cheating but everyone can see that he is playing the club because of the loop hole!

I'm singleing you out, but your's is the latest post.

Had the USGA approved the conforming wedges that he and Callaway submitted I do not think he would be using these. But since legal grooves were not allowed he is taking the loophole. BTW, where's the :beating a dead horse: smiley?

In my KZG Stand Bag:
919THI 11* w/ OBAN Revenge 6 (S)
919THI 16.5* w/ OBAN Revenge 7 (S)
KZG 18* & 22* U Iron w/ Matrix Studio 84 (S)
KZG 5-PW Cavity Back Forged III w/ N.S. Pro 1050 GH (S)KZG Forged TRS 50*, 54*, 58* w/ N.S. Pro 1050 GH (S)Kirk Currie/Wright San Saba 33" e7 or TriSpeed uProMy...


Posted
What a petulant brat Phil is to try and intimidate others into silence on this issue by calling the cheater comment 'slanderous', that's pathetic. . . . come on, Phil is hardly playing for a living, he's playing for Callaway on this issue.

What has it got to do with Callaway? The rule regarding Ping Eye 2 clubs was "grandfathered" in 1993.

i just think that the whole rule change is stupid, golf was getting the most exciting its ever been due to unreal shots and guys chucking it 30 feet behind the pin and ripping it back, it just doesnt feel as exciting!

It still happens. And you still see guys pitching it 3 feet short of the pin and the ball screws back 15 feet. Not quite sure why you find this exciting. Seems to me that a lot of people think that getting a ball to screw back requires incredible skill. Controlling spin is where the skill lies.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
I would not say that he is cheating but everyone can see that he is playing the club because of the loop hole!

Actually, it's odd that everyone calls this a "loophole." This is about as far from a "loophole" as you can get: it's an explicit allowance in the rule. A loophole is "an ambiguity or inadequacy in the law or a set of rules" (per the Apple dictionary). There's no ambiguity here, and it's hard to call it an "inadequacy" in the sense of the definition when the exception was spelled out so clearly. If there's a problem here at all, it's a problem with the rule, not with those who are following it. A real loophole was, e.g., performing a test drop with a ball not in play to determine the likely outcome of taking relief. This was clearly something not intended to be legal, but which (until the 2010 decisions updates) fell in between the various rules that might apply and wasn't quite against the rules. The new decision relies on equity to resolve this as illegal because it was found that the rules simply did not address the situation. Here you can't make that claim. Calling this a loophole makes it sound like the players are doing something shady, which they're not.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
It still happens. And you still see guys pitching it 3 feet short of the pin and the ball screws back 15 feet. Not quite sure why you find this exciting. Seems to me that a lot of people think that getting a ball to screw back requires incredible skill. Controlling spin is where the skill lies.

im not saying it requires incredible skill, it just looks more exciting to me than the ball pitching and then running on another 10 feet

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter


Posted
im not saying it requires incredible skill, it just looks more exciting to me than the ball pitching and then running on another 10 feet

To anyone who's, say, an 8 handicap or lower, it's not exciting at all. It's annoying if anything to hit a green, and watch as your ball rolls off the front.


Posted
Look how old the club is... They are ugly as heck also and so now, after the PGA changes a rule to change grooves he goes and gets one and plays it now... Come on dude...

Wait a minute. I believe they are the most popular irons in golf history. But, what do I know. I only own 7 sets. Anyone want some 87-90 cast wedges? I have plenty. Shame on the PGA for the rule change. Wanna make a difference in play? Go back to wound balls and make everyone play the same brand. THe PGA is going the way of NASCAR. Everyone will be playing clubs with the same diameter, weights, lofts, and shape. The groove rule is completely ridiculous. IMO.

G10 Driver Grafalloy Pro Launch Blue 65 Stiff
G5 3-Wood Aldila NV65-Stiff
G15 20 Hybrid TFC stiff
I15 Irons 4-P
S/M Black Nickel 52 56 60 Marxman Mini 33" Tour B330 RXCarroll Valley Resort, Fairfield PA Rating: 72.3 Slope: 128www.carrollvalley.com


Posted
To anyone who's, say,

lol ... nice cutoff choice for handicap!

Though I agree with you that watching someone spin it back isn't that exciting ... and I'm a high handicapper

Posted
lol ... nice cutoff choice for handicap!

Yeah, when I drop to a 5.7 or something, it will be "anyone lower than a 6 handicap." It's convenient.


Posted
To anyone who's, say, an 8 handicap or lower, it's not exciting at all. It's annoying if anything to hit a green, and watch as your ball rolls off the front.

I'm just saying it looks better when you hit the ball past the hole and it spins back to a couple of inches or even in the hole.

And do you not like it when you hit a good shot that spins back close?

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
To anyone who's, say, an 8 handicap or lower, it's not exciting at all. It's annoying if anything to hit a green, and watch as your ball rolls off the front.

all im saying is that to me it is more exciting like say yesterday on the 18th after phil had gone in the water, the shot that he played stopping it and bringing it back at touch seems more exciting to me than if he'd have played a low runner running towards the flag, but its all about opinions anyway :)

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter


  • Administrator
Posted
Can anyone who really knew the older players like Palmer/Nicklaus/Watson etc. even remotely imagine that they would stoop this low, exploit this technicality, and exhibit what is at best very poor sportsmanship? Not a chance, it's called integrity.

Not that I disagree with you, but Arnold Palmer famously endorsed the ERC II driver which was illegal. Most say Peter Kessler was fired from Golf Channel for challenging Arnie on it.

Shame on the PGA for the rule change. Wanna make a difference in play? Go back to wound balls and make everyone play the same brand. THe PGA is going the way of NASCAR. Everyone will be playing clubs with the same diameter, weights, lofts, and shape. The groove rule is completely ridiculous. IMO.

You want everyone to play the same ball, but think it's dumb that regulations on grooves that have always existed were modified slightly recently? And THAT change is what makes golf like NASCAR????? Logic failure, buddy.

Where were you before, when the rules change was being discussed, and when the report which showed some things fairly conclusively was published? (Ooooh, science.) In the clip segment yesterday pros were asked if they like the rules change and most did. Phil's comments were the only ones not in support of the rules change - and I still say he should be one of the happier guys, given his skill set. Besides, the guy's hit something like 8 of 42 fairways this week and is in fifth. He's embarrassing himself.
I'm just saying it looks better when you hit the ball past the hole and it spins back to a couple of inches or even in the hole.

If you say so. Seriously, I wonder if the dividing line has anything to do with handicap.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you say so. Seriously, I wonder if the dividing line has anything to do with handicap.

i really dont think this is the case because buddies of mine who play off handicaps below 5 also dont think its as exciting

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter


Posted
What a petulant brat Phil is to try and intimidate others into silence on this issue by calling the cheater comment 'slanderous', that's pathetic. Everyone knows what the intent of the new rule is, to limit spin and try and reshape the game a bit, why does Phil think he's not covered by this. So what if it is a technicality, Phil sounds all lawyered up on this. I suppose he's doing this to make a point on behalf of Callaway about their grooves not being allowed, he's really thumbing his nose at the Tour . . . clearly he's not above this type of childishness. The comments some have made about 'playing for a living' justifying him trying to get an unfair advantage . . . come on, Phil is hardly playing for a living, he's playing for Callaway on this issue.

I think you're way off base... the fact is these wedges ARE legal and the TOUR needs to address the issue and reach a settlement with Ping or or the players. Phil is making a good point, as is anyone playing these clubs.

Calling him a cheater probably is slanderous if you aren't careful how you state it. If I were serious about my reputation and someone accused me of cheating when I was completely within the rules, I'd be pissed too.

I agree... with this, no question about integrity here.

This is the point to this whole conversation! Phil nor anyone else would be playing those clubs if they did not have the grooves, plain enough. Look how old the club is... They are ugly as heck also and so now, after the PGA changes a rule to change grooves he goes and gets one and plays it now... Come on dude... I would not say that he is cheating but everyone can see that he is playing the club because of the loop hole!

I don't think anyone (including Phil) would argue the fact that he IS playing the Pings because they have "better" grooves. What exactly does your point have to do with the fact that all these players are well WITHIN the rules and NOT CHEATING!

My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Note: This thread is 5786 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In driving a car you have all sorts of random or variable parts, though. Different speeds, corners, conditions, size of turns… even different cars and sizes, different traffic and laws (lights, signs, etc.). I don't think I've seen anyone doing "block practice" to practice the same exact turn 100 times, then trying it in the real world.
    • IMHO, block practice is good. Any new motor pattern or a 'move' has to be committed to muscle memory and be reproducable at command without conscious thought as the final goal. I don't see how this is that much different than learning how to drive a car, or let's say how to handle the steering for example. One must do it enough times and then also do it in different situations to commit to all layers of brain - judgment of demand, decision making, judgment of response and finally execution. Unless each layer is familiar of each of their role in the specific motor move, it is not truly learned and you will simply fall back to the original pattern. I think the random practice is simply committing the learned pattern to different scenarios or intervals of time to replicate in the real world (actual rounds). It breeds further familiarity learned from block practice. Steer the car a hundred times to learn the move (block) and then drive the car all over town to make it real world (random) to a level of maturity. I don't see how block and random have to be in conflict with each other.  
    • Yea, I think the first thing is to define block, variable, and random practice with regards to golf.  The easiest one might be in practicing distance control for putting. Block practice would be just hitting 50 putts from 5 feet, then 50 putts from 10 ft then 50 putts from 15 ft. While random practice would having a different distance putt for every putt.  In terms of learning a new motor pattern, like let's say you want to make sure the clubhead goes outside the hands in the backswing. I am not sure how to structure random practice. Maybe block practice is just making the same 100 movements over and over again. I don't get how a random practice is structured for something like learning a new motor pattern for the golf swing.  Like, if a NFL QB needs to work on their throw. They want to get the ball higher above the shoulder. How would random practice be structured? Would they just need someone there to say, yes or no for feedback? That way the QB can go through an assortment of passing drills and throws trying to get the wright throwing motion?  For me, how do you structure the feedback and be time effective. Let's say you want to work on the club path in the backswing. You go out to the course to get some random practice. Do you need to set up the camera at each spot, check after each shot to make it random?  I know that feedback is also a HUGE part of learning. I could say, I went to the golf course and worked on my swing. If I made 40 golf swings on the course, what if none of them were good reps because I couldn't get any feedback? What if I regressed? 
    • I found it odd that both Drs. (Raymond Prior and Greg Rose) in their separate videos gave the same exact math problem (23 x 12), and both made the point of comparing block practice to solving the same exact math problem (23 x 12) over and over again. But I've made the point that when you are learning your multiplication tables… you do a bunch of similar multiplications over and over again. You do 7 x 8, then 9 x 4, then 3 x 5, then 2 x 6, and so on. So, I think when golf instructors talk about block practice, they're really not understanding what it actually is, and they're assuming that someone trying to kinda do the same thing is block practice, but when Dr. Raymond Prior said on my podcast that what I was describing was variable practice… then… well, that changes things. It changes the results of everything you've heard about how "block" practice is bad (or ineffective).
    • Day 121 12-11 Practice session this morning. Slowing the swing down. 3/4 swings, Getting to lead side better, trying to feel more in sync with swing. Hit foam balls. Good session overall. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.