Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5802 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Does anyone have experience with cutting down men's (or women's) wedges or putters for use by juniors? My son is 12 (4'-10"), and I am starting to think about transitioning him into full sized clubs. I realize the implications of shaft stiffness with cut down clubs. For that reason, he is currently playing a set of Ping junior clubs. However, now seems to be the right time to get him into full sized wedges and a putter. I am thinking of getting some used Cleveland or Titleist wedges, and just cutting them down to 32 inches or so, and cutting a putter down to 31". No one seems to make good quality adult-style wedges and putters for kids.

Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated.

In My Grom:
Driver: Taylormade R1 10.5°
Fairway: Taylormade RocketBallz Stage 2 Tour 14.5°
Hybrids: Ping G25 3, 4
Irons: Mizuno 5-PW JPX 800 Pro

Wedges: CG-14 50°, 56°, 60°

Putter: Nike Method 003


Posted
I know when i was a kid (not too long ago, i'm 17) i learned the game with my father's cut down Mizuno Altron PW. It seems like you son is a little past that. Basically the only options for kids clubs are ultra-light, extremely whippy US Kids clubs, or something heavier. I might not be the best person to ask because i was about 5 foot 5 when i was 12, but Nike makes some pretty good kids clubs. They aren't as flexible as the US Kids ones, but they are still really light.

If you want to get him full sized clubs, I would recommend getting him a couple womens or senior clubs. If he can swallow his pride, they are lighter and have more flexible shafts, and you could cut them down without them becoming too stiff, at least less stiff than comparable men's clubs. They are also usually cheaper than men's clubs I believe.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Clubs with M (senior flex) taylormade look exactly the same as R S or X I mean like their irons and hybrids with graphite. I would advise to get you son custom fitted first to see what he needs.

Posted
Obviously flex does not matter with a putter, so in this case I was more worried about the weight of the head. Extra weight here might actually help, right. With the wedges, I know almost all wedges come in "Wedge Flex". How does that relate to R, S, X, etc.? If wedge flex is very stiff already, cutting down the shaft probably wouldn't matter much since the shots are typically smaller swings.

In My Grom:
Driver: Taylormade R1 10.5°
Fairway: Taylormade RocketBallz Stage 2 Tour 14.5°
Hybrids: Ping G25 3, 4
Irons: Mizuno 5-PW JPX 800 Pro

Wedges: CG-14 50°, 56°, 60°

Putter: Nike Method 003


Posted
i grew up playing a partial set of cut down spaulding executives, and a tom watson 56*

i had no trouble with them.

RBZ stage 2 driver & 3 wood

Original AP1 4-GW

Vokey 54.10 & 58.04

Scotty Newport 2


Posted
When my son was about that height, I moved him to a set of Nike Eagle clubs which included a PW and putter. Those clubs were designed for juniors 4'10" and taller. That was a few years ago, so I don't know if Nike still offers a similar model. Sports Authority and Roger Dunn Golf carried the Nike Eagles.

When he reached about 5'2", I switched him to womens clubs. Cleveland made women's versions of their 588 and CG11 wedges (shorter length with lighter, graphite shafts). I believe Cleveland currently makes a women's version of the CG14.

Posted
I got my mizunos which were cut down for previous owner which devalues the club so I got a great deal i was about 4'10 at that time also

Posted
If you cut more than a half-inch off a shaft, increased stiffness could become noticeable.

Ralph Maltby talks about this on one of his forums:
http://www.ralphmaltby.com/forum/art...ge=12#number65

Women's clubs would be something to consider. Given he's less than 5-foot-2, women's petites might fit him quite well. (Yes, clubs come in petite too)

Also, women's standard clubs cut off a full inch might go from A flex to R flex.

When I was a caddie years ago, the littlest guy in our group took a lesson from the pro, who put him into women's clubs. For the next two years, he beat us soundly using those women's clubs, because the rest of us were all trying to use men's clubs that were "too strong" for us.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No like they make a womens version of the taylormade R9 and I didn't even notice the diffence but taylormades kind of womens light blue isn't that bad ihave a 3 wood like that

Note: This thread is 5802 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.