• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
delav

Project X Flighted Shafts - Player Input

Recommended Posts

delav    40
Currently playing a set of 6.5 flighted project X shafts. Although distance, shot shape and trajectory is very good, the feel is quite different from previous shafts played.

My old irons have s300's, which are obviously quite a bit softer and kick differently. With that said, I feel like I am missing a bit of feel with the Project X, perhaps 5-10 yards difference as well on well-struck balls.

With that said, accuracy is awesome with the Project X. Much more consistent misses, fewer big draw shots, solid shots are 2-3 yard draws.

Should I be concerned about playing a 6.5? I know that this is pretty darn stiff in comparison to other rifle shafts and s and x true temper flex shafts.

For reference:

Driver Carry - 275 (105-110 mph)
7-Iron Carry - 175 (95-100 mph)

Any Input from others playing these shafts? Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Blades4me    3
IMO the 6.5 PX shafts may be a bit too stiff; (thats what it sounds like with increase in accuracy, decrease in distance and lack of feel). As a rule of thumb the PX's will play approximately a half flex stiffer than rated. The flighted shafts are a little softer than the non flighted.

To me the DG shafts are a loose kicking shaft and PX's are a tight kicking shaft. I've played DG 300
R & S's and now both my play'n set of irons have PX shafts. My Missy's have 5.0 non flighted and my 78 Wilson Staff's (1-pw) have 5.5 non flighted. My driver ss is 107 mph with carry 260+ and 6i ss 86 mph with carry ~170. And as weird as this sounds, I'm a swinger and perfer the PX shaft to any other shaft that I've tired.

The KBS shaft is also very good, not my favorite, but none the less still a very good shaft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

delav    40
Thanks for the input. Sounds like I need to talk to a club fitter. Although I'm not unhappy with the distance or accuracy, the feel leaves a great deal to be desired when hitting my s300's back to back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pingman    0
I used to play DG X200 Parallel shafts and the PX shafts I have now are more or less about the same. However, working at the golf course and having a golf pro and having many tools and technology at my disposal helps. Don't get discouraged about the PX shafts, maybe you just need something less stiff, you said you had S300's so try out some 5.5 PX's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

delav    40
Thanks again!

Went and saw a great club fitter at Golf USA today. The guy was very knowledgeable about KBS, Rifle, TT, Proj X, etc... He helped clarify what the flighted (& other) shafts do, measured my swing speed, ball speed and spin rates. As a high ball hitter, I'm not sure I love the flighted shafts in my long irons, but we will see.

With a 6 iron I was hitting the ball fairly high (21 degree launch angle), swing speed ranging between 88 and 95 or so. Its likely this will creep up in the next few weeks as I continue to stretch and transition into the new workout routine for golf season. Side spin (right to left) was around 300-400 rpm for a slight draw, but backspin was well above 10,000 rpm.

Based on my swing speed, calculations land me around a 6.3 for Project X shafts, and he said the 6.5 will play a bit softer due to the fact that they are flighted. If I were very concerned about feel right now, he recommended soft-stepping using a new set of 6.5's so that they would play more like a 6.3, but felt that 6.0's would be too soft.

All in all, it was a good experience. I think I'll sick with a 6.5 for the next while as I iron out some new swing changes, and I'll let you know how things feel!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gtkgolf    0

I just ordered a new set of the AP2 714 irons with PX 6.5. Current Muzuno MP59 with S300 and all of my shafts in my woods showed up in super slow motion as being to weak and prone to hook.

Changed to better shaft in driver and and my teacher, who teaches three PGA player, said the numbers were perfect.

PX shafts are consistant and a bit stiffer but not as stiff as X100. I have found these shasts to produce better flighting and very straight shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WUTiger    455

The world of golf has started using FCM (frequency cycle matching) ratings as a way to compare flexes across different shaft manufacturers. Also, shaft weight will influence the amount of clubhead speed a club will generate.

It's not clear to me the details on your irons. Did you reshaft the TM TP (2009) irons from S300 to PX 6.5?

Comparison:

  • S300... FCM = 5.8, weight = 130 gr.
  • PX 6.5 Rifle Flighted (2012 and earlier) ..FCM = 7.0, weight = 130 grams or
  • PX95 6.5 Flighted (2013).......................FCM = 7.0, weight = 106 grams.

IF you reshafted with PX95, you would have a lighter but stiffer shaft (about 1.2 flexes stiffer).

If you reshafted/switched to irons with the older PX 6.5, would have a same-weight shaft that is about 1.2 flexes stiffer. Also, the Dynamic Gold S300 is a low-launch shaft, while either of the PX versions would be mid-launch. Also, the flighting would give the long irons a bit of boost on launch, while keeping the short irons from ballooning.

With what the fitter said, if you softstepped the PX shaft, it would bring it down to PX 6.2 (1 x softstep reduces stiffness about 0.3 flexes). But, if your stretch routine will increase flexibility and power --> clubhead speed, then you might wait until spring to see if you still need to softstep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

WUTiger    455

The world of golf has started using FCM (frequency cycle matching) ratings...

A terminology error... FCM = frequency coefficient matching :8)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Good to have golfers from all over the planet here. See you around! Under the "How To..." drop down menu above, there are all kinds of things there you might want to scan through. How to create an "avatar" How to get "Achievements" (those little icons that show up at the bottom of your posts) How to quote people or other sources How to embed video. Just lots of the details about how things get done here. Since you're interested in instruction, don't miss the "Info...Instructional Content" link in the menu above. Also linked here below. That'll give you a sense of some of the top instruction threads that have been created here in the past. Lastly, you mentioned that there are lots of "tips" here- and you'll quickly find that this site does not promote the idea of hunting the internet for "tips." This site is all about finding the correct priority for fixing a swing (not always easy for us golfers to know) and then applying practice techniques to address that one thing. Then move on to the next priority. I'm not saying that I think you are one of these "tip-hunters", but since you mentioned the word, I just wanted to put it out there that there are lots of testimonies here about the futile search for "tips" on the internet and not improving much as a result of going from one tip to another.  Anyway, welcome! Here's the thread I mentioned above.  
    • Winston Salem only carries balls. The other stores are at least 1.5 hours away.
    • I agree.... my mechanics are to blame much more than my composure, as is the case with the majority of us.  If you read my comment in context of the previous comments, you'll see I wasn't claiming composure>physical at all. 
    • Revealing thread, there are varying "definitions" of what's mental and what's physical. I would have called game planning, green reading and just practicing effectively mental, along with just maintaining composure/managing pressure/stress. What's the essential difference between someone who just mindlessly bashes ball after ball at the range vs someone who practices with purpose? "The way I look at it in golf is that the mental game is a mechanism for fulfilling physical potential. Physical potential being a function of natural ability and effort put in through practice, instruction, conditioning, etc. Physical potential won’t automatically be transferred to the golf course in the form of performance. That is where a strong mental game steps in and allows the body to perform the tasks it has already been trained to do. In other words, the mental game bridges physical potential and physical performance. When faced with consequence on the golf course, the physical motion the body already knows how to perform can be hindered by doubt, fear, and anxiety. Our mind and body know how to physically execute the shot, and the mental game is required to protect that ability by warding off the potential doubt, fear or anxiety."
    • Today I came across to this video and just wanted to share it with you guys Her swing looks great! 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CoachB25
      CoachB25
      (60 years old)
    2. Fsgolfer
      Fsgolfer
      (61 years old)
    3. Zach
      Zach
      (27 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon