Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5705 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I see the irons manufacturers typically profile the player they think the club is best suited for. Usually I see low, mid, and high handicappers. Some say low to mid, others say mid to high, etc. What do yiou think the golf manufacturers consider low, middle, and high?
Driver: Cobra ZL 3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher War Club: Burner Titanium Raylor 21degree Hybrid: Bobby Jones 24 4-PW: Ping i3's Wedges:Mizuno MP T-10 White Satin 52, 56, 60 Putter: 15 year old Odyssey Rossi Blade. Ball: Bridgestone e5 Swing Oil: Grey Goose, always in the bag.

Posted
Like the various flexes, it varies manufacturer to manufacturer. I was at a demo day a few months ago, and told a TaylorMade rep that I'm a 16-handicap after I demo'ed their Players' Irons (R9s, I think?). He said that, at that level, I shouldn't even be considering those, and should be playing something more like their GI irons. By contrast, when I mentioned to the Mizuno reps that I was playing MP-57s, they said that they're great irons for a player of my ability.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I still wonder about this. I'm leaning toward a pretty solid 'I dunno' with a bit of 'depends on your swing'?

Got to a Callaway demo day just this afternoon. Great opportunity as having multiple left-handed clubs around to try out has not been an available luxury since moving to a smaller town. At the end of the day, the rep had me pegged as a tweener in most respects. Actually said I should be avoiding beginner irons, though I'm not entirely sure why (Granted, I don't LIKE shovel irons, but I'm not sure why a person should necessarily avoid them if they don't mind looking at them). I probably hit the X22 Tours the best, about ten yards further than the regular 22s -- Problem being wider dispersion distance-wise. X22 6i hanging around 160 plus or minus a few yards... X22 Tour 6i ranging from 160-175. Now, adding 15 potential yards SOUNDS nice on paper, but who can judge distances with a 15+ yard distance dispersion?

Anyway, my original point was: Had me pegged somewhere between 'Players Irons' and 'Game Improvement Irons', and no-no on Super GI Irons. Also said, surprising for a company rep, that they didn't really have anything in lefty models that fit that bill. (Not really sure how to interpret that, but...*shrug*)

Aside: Had the same deal with driver fitting. Either a heavier R-flex or a lighter S-flex... and 10.5 launching a liiiitle bit high, 9.5 a liiiitle bit low. *laugh*

Currently in my bag:  Under Revision


Posted
If you compare the player profiling to Ralph Maltby's MPF index, you can get an idea of how "user-friendly" the irons are. But, even Maltby cautions that MPF only deals with head design, and doesn't factor in what kind of shaft you need.

So, player profiling is useful if you know where you are in your game, and where you're going.

I played in a scramble with a former small-college player who once played to a 2 HDCP with blades. But, with a job and a family, he now plays to about 9 with Game Improvement clubs. He says the consistency of GI helps him score better than trying to play blades when he's not at top swing form any more. Eliminating misses helps him more than being able to "work one" on occasion.

Going the other way, a 20 HDCP who is seeing a better swing emerge, and who plans to work on his game, might go from SGI to GI. Again, you need to have the right shaft choice to maximize performance of any club.

The player profiles are based on averages from marketing data. Whenever you have averages, you find exceptions to the rule used to set up the averages.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So, player profiling is useful if you know where you are in your game, and

Yeah, that's a point I was dancing around and never got around to actually SAYING, haha. In my instance, I was thinking I could go either way depending on my intentions. If I want to grove a better swing, I'm thinking I'd eat the potential distance gaps of less forgiveness (This is where I am mentally, now)... If I wanted to just play and shoot for scores, I'd drop back down to the GIs (An idea I haven't entirely abandoned, but probably isn't in my basic character when Improvement and Hard Work are possible options, heh).

(That, and getting something without all that damn offset.)

Currently in my bag:  Under Revision


Posted
I never even mention handicap. I go and hit some balls, then take a suggestion. My last trip the fitter recommended getting a players iron, and to avoid GI irons. He said to look for something like an MP-57, CG-7 Tour, S-58, or something similar. I ended up with the Nike Pro Combos, which he agreed were a good fit. That's generally how I do it. When a fitter tells me it's time for blades, I'll get blades.

Posted
My cynical side tells me that the the Big Name companies label golfers purely from a marketing perspective in order to justify multiple lines of clubs, and they will tell people anything they want to hear, especially as they smell a pending sale. They can stroke a person's ego in order to sell a more expensive set of clubs rather than thier entry level.

In truth, companies are just guessing and generallizing people's ability becasue there is no right answer. A person could be an excellent ball striker and irons player, but average 40 putts in a round if that is thier week area. Their high handicap might indicate that they need game-improvement irons, but in reality they could easily be playing blades and effectively working the ball left and right in order to get closer to the green and pin for easier putts.

Driver: 600t 10.5*
3Wood: TBD
Irons: 1 Iron Golf 3i-PW
Putter: O-Blade
Hobby: I enjoy collecting samples of vintage Ping


Posted
A person could be an excellent ball striker and irons player, but average 40 putts in a round if that is thier week area. Their high handicap might indicate that they need game-improvement irons, but in reality they could easily be playing blades and effectively working the ball left and right in order to get closer to the green and pin for easier putts.

Maybe a "1/2 decent ball striker" could

average 40 putts, but not an excellent one. I'm not an "excellent" ball striker by any stretch of the imagination, but I had two consecutive putting rounds that approached 40 and I knew it was time to overhaul my putting. To take over 40 is a lot of putts - like I mean, it would really be a lot of putts for an excellent ball striker .

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
If i were an "excellent" ball striker and put of 40+ strokes on the putting green, i'd find a way to put my putter shaft through my head.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I had a discussion with a titleist marketing lady (i forget her name) because i was interesting in joining their department over the winter. They consider anyone from 0-5 as a highly skilled player and anyone 6-15 as aspiring . The brand primarily markets their clubs to those demographics.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
I had a discussion with a titleist marketing lady (i forget her name) because i was interesting in joining their department over the winter. They consider anyone from 0-5 as a

from my understanding only the AP1 and the AP2 (the latter for a high single digit handicapper) are marketed for the aspiring player while the MB/CB are aimed at the highly skilled player. however, their woods are suggested from 0-15 so that they fit both player ranges. this is how titleist does it but other brands are very different. as an example, a taylormade ret at a recent demo day was classifying the irons based on trajectory: lower ball flight = players irons and so on. this shows you that each brand is different and that you shouldn't really trust a rep whos classifying you based on your handicap.


Posted
I had a discussion with a titleist marketing lady (i forget her name) because i was interesting in joining their department over the winter. They consider anyone from 0-5 as a

I consider myself

highly aspiring , so the AP2 would probably appeal to me - aesthetically they sure do!

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
from my understanding only the AP1 and the AP2 (the latter for a high single digit handicapper) are marketed for the aspiring player while the MB/CB are aimed at the highly skilled player. however, their woods are suggested from 0-15 so that they fit both player ranges. this is how titleist does it but other brands are very different. as an example, a taylormade ret at a recent demo day was classifying the irons based on trajectory: lower ball flight = players irons and so on. this shows you that each brand is different and that you shouldn't really trust a rep whos classifying you based on your handicap.

Yeah, thats true.

THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
I consider myself "aspiring" but have been stuck at 28 index for almost a year, struggling to break 100. Maybe I should consider myself "crap" and use a garden spade!

Posted
I consider myself "aspiring" but have been stuck at 28 index for almost a year, struggling to break 100. Maybe I should consider myself "crap" and use a garden spade!

Ouch I hope that was just a joke. Aspiring means you have a goal of improvement. What is your improvement plan?

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Ouch I hope that was just a joke. Aspiring means you have a goal of improvement. What is your improvement plan?

Personally, I think this season's goal is to start making it through rounds without the nagging concern that the next shot is going to go screaming into the next fairway and take a life. *snork*

Currently in my bag:  Under Revision


Note: This thread is 5705 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.