Jump to content
IGNORED

Baddeley Post-SnT


nlowplacez
Note: This thread is 5104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Was watching the Texas Open today and the announcers were talking about Baddeley while he was on the tee. Sometimes they're full of crap i know. n e way, one said something along the lines of Baddeley used to be in the S & T school and has since moved on to traditional swing with weight shift and whatnot. Truthfully, I don't remember ever seeing him play as well as today while he was stackin and tiltin. I'm wondering if anyone has an idea of why he might have moved away from it or if he ever said what he didn't like about it. I was considering trying S&T; for a while to see if maybe that could be the thing to get me over the ammy pro hump. But I've always been waiting for someone to emerge from the PGA pack who uses it to give it some validity and prove its worth in my own mind. yalls guesses are probably as good as mine, but figured i'd throw it out anyway.

(i know theres posts on S&T; but not much on pros quitting it and henceforth improving)
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I haven't seen Baddeley play since moving away from stack and tilt, but he had some great tournaments when he was using stack and tilt. Wasn't it a Major (US Open maybe?) that he was leading going into the last day and choked?

If you've gotten to a +1.9 with your current swing, I'd say if it isn't broke, don't fix it. The only thing that will get you over the amateur/pro hump is hitting your approach shots closer thus giving you better chances at making birdie putts; obviously, you're well aware of this though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Aaron Baddeley

Source: Stackandtiltgolfswing.com

Aaron met Mike and Andy through the recommendation of Steve Elkington and Tommy Armour at the end of the 2005 season. He won his first tournament in 2006. In 2007 he won again and later that fall he won for a third time the Australian Masters for three wins in two years. During this time his world ranking went from 170th to 17th, including 7 top 10s on his way to finishing 6th on the FedEx Cup in 2007. He made 7 million dollars with 12 top 10s and 27 top 25 finishes in this period. He has not worked with Mike and Andy since Mar 12, 2009. His world ranking on that date was 34.




Source: Stack and Tilt Golf Swing website . You can find other records on the link.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
(i know theres posts on S&T; but not much on pros quitting it and henceforth improving)

I'd say he hasn't improved (not yet, or not measurably). Zeph posted the chart.

And as I've said before, if he subsequently improves again, it's not necessarily because he left the S&T; camp. He won't have forgotten all of the things he learned. He won't have forgotten the ball flight laws, which many pros still get wrong. He won't have changed his mindset from the analytical one that S&T; prefers to the "let's try this" hodge podge teaching a surprising number of pros prefer.
has since moved on to traditional swing with weight shift and whatnot.

Again, S&T; has a weight shift like every other golf swing. For a righty, your weight goes back to the right side and then comes forward to the left side in the downswing. Same as every other swing used by good to great players ever.

Truthfully, I don't remember ever seeing him play as well as today while he was stackin and tiltin.

Nah, he just won twice (his only wins on the PGA Tour) and led the U.S. Open. His world ranking only shot up... You don't remember, so check the stats.

Besides, did you watch his swing? He didn't have a lot of lateral translation of his head. He stayed fairly centered. His hands still gained good (not great) depth. The thing he's reportedly working on this year is taking his hands to the sky - really pushing them upwards. That's great - you can get some power that way (not much, but a teeny bit more, and Aaron's always hit the ball pretty well for a guy his size) - but you're going to have trouble timing it for 72 holes or from week to week.
But I've always been waiting for someone to emerge from the PGA pack who uses it to give it some validity and prove its worth in my own mind.

Again, Aaron Baddeley may be your best example. His only two PGA Tour wins have come with S&T; thus far. Any PGA Tour win he gets after will be with the knowledge he added from Mike and Andy, and while they won't get 100% credit, they won't get 0% either... and he's yet to add that third win, anyway. Look at the charts:

http://stackandtiltgolfswing.com/the-record/ .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Again, Aaron Baddeley may be your best example. His only two PGA Tour wins have come with S&T; thus far. Any PGA Tour win he gets after will be with the knowledge he added from Mike and Andy, and while they won't get 100% credit, they won't get 0% either... and he's yet to add that third win, anyway.

I'm not a big fan of the "Baddeley retains all of his S&T; knowledge" argument. Of course, I can see why people would say that, but it seems to come dangerously close to having it both ways. S&T;'ers will say that Baddeley's rise up the world rankings after he left Plummer and Bennett was caused by his rejection of S&T; equally, it seems, they'll say that any success he might have in the future will be due, at least in part, to the "knowledge" of S&T; that he retains. I think the latter claim is dubious when Baddeley has returned to his original coach (Lynch) in a deliberate attempt to move back to the swing he had when he won his two ("dinky" ... ha ha!) Australian Opens and was being lauded as the next Tiger-killer. Really, the great tragedy about Baddeley is that he's still miles away from living up to the promise he showed well before his Leadbetter and S&T; days.

Current setup:
Titleist 909D2 9.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Titleist 909F2 15.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Mizuno MP-57 3-P, Nippon NS Pro 1050GH Stiff | Titleist Vokey SM 54.11, 60.07 | Scotty Cameron ACVII / Napa California | Titleist Pro V1X
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I'm not a big fan of the "Baddeley retains all of his S&T; knowledge" argument. Of course, I can see why people would say that, but it seems to come dangerously close to having it both ways.

And I'd agree, which is why I don't care that you misquoted me. I said he'd retain some of his knowledge. He knows some simple premises that apply to ANY swing. He knows what parts of his swing to measure and what parts to look at on video if he wants to a certain shot. That's all. He knows a bit of geometry, so if his swing is a bit wonky on any given day or any time, he can still fall back on basic knowledge - and fix it himself.

Also, I specifically said things like: - he won't have forgotten the ball flight laws - he won't have forgotten the analytical way you can look at a golf swing I could add to that list but they're all things that don't really even have to do with the golf swing. Tiger Woods is the sum total of all of the coaches he's had. He himself says he still goes back to what his dad taught him as a youngster when times are tough. He won't say it but you know it's true that he also remembers bits and pieces of what Butch Harmon taught him as well. The next instructor will get a guy with more built-in knowledge than Hank Haney got him, and Butch Harmon before that. If Baddeley ever wins again, he'll undoubtedly give full credit to his new instructors, as he should. But hey, we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. Until then, nlowplacez is just a hater with a bad memory.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Off topic I know, but the last two rounds I've played, I've had the best ball striking off my life by simply having the feeling of keeping my weight centred over my left side. Ive started to hit a draw again which is nice and fading the ball isn't as hard as I thought it would be. The whole idea of keeping your swing bottom in the same spot just eliminates for me the timing aspect and as a result i have been flushing pretty much everything.

I listened to Andy and mike talk that Aaron thought he wasn't getting better. But how exactly did he think this? Was he not consistent enough or too one dimensional in his shot making or something? What would reverting back to his 'old style' allow him to do better?
I know I posted a thread/post about his change a while back and now realise it was a stupid post as Stack and tilt is actually very sound from the research I have done and first hand experience of trying pieces of it.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I watched a bit on Sunday. The thing I noticed about his swing is it seemed less effecient and quick. I remember when he won how simple his swing looked. Sunday, it seems long and sloppy. I prefer the compact simple swings so to me his swing seemed worse.

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It depends on what you mean by "while the core remains still" I wouldn't consider his core "remaining still" here, DJ's abs, belly button, and belt buckle have rotated almost 90 degrees by the top of the backswing. Those components of his core then have to rotate/uncoil on the downswing. Far from remaining still IMO.
    • It’s going to change but your basic setup feel should be about the same. Your body kind of adjusts to length and lie angle of the club. You’ll want to pay attention more to ball position as you change clubs more than how bent over you are. I understood what you meant from what your wrote.
    • Oh I probably was thinking the wrong thing or the wrong way when I typed the golf swing was more of a body swing (in my mind).  The in my mind part probably should have said in my opinion or based on what I have read.  Just meant the body needs to be involved more than the hands and swinging the arms while the core remains still.
    • The answer to this question is a very small change in impact can cause a BIG impact in direction. This is with the driver, but its similar with the irons... How much does an open or closed clubface affect your drives? | RoboTest Want to hit more fairways? The latest edition of GOLF's RoboTest highlights the importance of driver face angle. For a driver, 1 degree of clubface open or shut causes 10 yards of left or right. When you think the rate of closure for a golf club, how fast the club face goes from open (top of the golf swing) to square (at impact), 1 degree is a small quantity.  This means, when you are looking at video of your swing, you can see the exact same swing, but present the clubface in two widely separate positions. More so if you have swing faults. You can make the same backswing, but not get your weight forward well and hit a fat shot. You then react to this, try not to fat it so you thin it. Maybe the timing is off on the extension part of the downswing and you thin it slightly. Also, certain swing movements cause the wrists to flip at impact. The intent is still to hit the ball with the club. So your hands are going to adjust to find the ball. The more they have to adjust, the more difficult it is to repeat. Nope, it is way less mental than physical. If we could all think our way to a better swing, we would all be PGA tour players.  #GOLF IS HARD!  Beginners have repeatable swings, just bad repeatable swing. We all just need to make repeatable better swings.  The golf swing is a battle of making movements that allow the club to do good things. You results are from a bad swing that has a wider range of outcomes. Your outcomes are probably the following. Way more thins, fats, skulls than most. You hardly see PGA Tour players fat, skull or thin a shot.  The first principle of golf is FEEL IS NOT REAL. Meaning, we can feel things in the golf swing, yet it produces results or shows on video as something else.  You just set up to the ball. The club has a different length, so you need to adjust. For most your arms extend more out as you have a longer club. You also bend over less for longer clubs. It is just something you get used to. If you make a fist and stick your thumb out. You want that width from the butt end of the club and your belt buckle. Now, if you taller or shorter than most, then you may need to adjust the length of your clubs.    
    • At address? I think so. Downswing and through? IDK. I doubt if a whole lot of golfers, if any at all, deliberately think "I have a 9-iron so I need to bend half an inch more through the downswing compared to my 8 iron". 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...