Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well I'm the latest to be hooked by this monster.....

Read so many great reviews about how high and long this driver is and decided to take the plunge.

This thing is SUPER long! I was regularly hitting about 30ft up on the net at the end of the range that says 250yds. Now in reality it may only be 225yds but in comparison to my R9 it was easily 15ft higher on the net than I can normally hit. What was also surprising was the ability to hit it straight with the stupid long/light shaft.

Will probably cut it down to 45 or so but since the shaft is so light I may be forced to put some lead powder in there or purchase a heavier one for it.

Anyone else try it out? I am going to get the matching fairway woods in place of my 07 Burners.

Posted
I tried one out at a local Dicks Sporting Goods but just cant afford $400 for a new driver, it might have been the Supertri, dont remember for sure but it felt good. Im working currently on hitting both of my cheapo drivers better and am making good progress, had a good range session today, not sure which one I like better, still undecided but at least now its because im hitting both of them pretty good instead of hitting both of them poorly.

In my bag
Driver-top flite cannon 460 cc 10.5 deg, reg flex
3 Wood-ACUITY GOLF RCX 14°
3h-warrior golf tcp 20°
4h-warrior golf tcp 23°5h-warrior golf tcp 26° 6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 SERIES irons steel shafts regular flex56° sw-tour seriesram puttergolf balls-intech beta ti


Posted
I've got one in my bag. I love it.

Syncro bag
Superfast Burner 9.5° S driver
G5 4-PW irons
Burner '08 22° 4h
53° wedge 56° wedge iN Li'l Wack-E putter PD Long ballSlowly working on upgrading my old bargain bin clubs.


Posted
Don't touch it!!!! TM pays engineers BIG BUCKS to come up with ideas. Leave it long and don't add head weight. Contrary to most people on this forum, I believe a under 200g head,under 60g shaft at 46" long with a 25g grip(Winn Lite) produces a driver with a dead weight of 275 g that any golfer with half a swing can hit longer and straighter with.

Wishon  715 CLC-AXE5 A shaft -hard steppedt -44.5"
4 wood-Infiniti 17*-UST IROD A shaft-Hard stepped(2009 model)
Hybrids 19* & 24*-Trident DSW-UST IROD Hybrid A shaft-hard stepped (2009 model)
Irons-5-PW- Wilson Staff Progressive Forged-TT Release  sensicore( 5&6-Soft stepped R-7,8&9-R-wedge hard stepped R
Wedges-52*-Wilson JP BeCE(54* bent to 52*)-TT-Release sensicore-hard stepped R

              56*Wilson R-61 BECU Sandy Andy- Release sensicore tipped same as 8 iron

               60* Wilson Harmonized BECU-Release sensicore tipped same as 8 iron

Woods- Star Grips  Irons Energy Grips

:Putter-Rife IBF with Ping Blackout Grip-35"

Ball-Wilson Staff Zip Golf. or C-25


Posted
i have an 09 burner, wish i had an R9.
The shaft is riddiculous long, you'll hit my fairways and be in safe zones without the 46.5 inch shaft

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


Posted
Well I'm the latest to be hooked by this monster.....

Monster, you got it right there - it looks like a monster, but that's about as far as it goes.

What is it with Taylor Made - almost every single club they make (with the exception of the TP models) has a shaft 6 inches longer than everything else out there and is a full club stronger in loft. Before long they'll come out with a 21 degree pitching wedge.
In the bag...

G10 9° Driver
G10 17° 4 Wood
G10 21° Hybrid i15 4-PW Tour-W Wedges 50/12 & 56/10 Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 (35")Balls - Bridgestone B330-RX

Posted
Don't touch it!!!! TM pays engineers BIG BUCKS to come up with ideas. Leave it long and don't add head weight. Contrary to most people on this forum, I believe a under 200g head,under 60g shaft at 46" long with a 25g grip(Winn Lite) produces a driver with a dead weight of 275 g that any golfer with half a swing can hit longer and straighter with.

Longer yes, straighter no. The longer the shaft, the harder it is to hit straight. There is a reason most tour players play thier drivers around 44.5".


Posted
Don't touch it!!!! TM pays engineers BIG BUCKS to come up with ideas. Leave it long and don't add head weight. Contrary to most people on this forum, I believe a under 200g head,under 60g shaft at 46" long with a 25g grip(Winn Lite) produces a driver with a dead weight of 275 g that any golfer with half a swing can hit longer and straighter with.

Why would someone hit a lighter driver with a longer shaft straighter than a heavier driver with a shorter shaft? It seems completely contradictory and I would love to hear a more in depth explanation of your claim.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Why would someone hit a lighter driver with a longer shaft straighter than a heavier driver with a shorter shaft? It seems completely contradictory and I would love to hear a more in depth explanation of your claim.

Lighter club allows you to swing it faster. More clubhead speed should produce more ball speed which makes the ball go farther. I can swing a sledge hammer which is much heavier with a shorter handle than a club at the ball and it will not go farther even though the sledge hammer is heavier and shorter allowing me more control.


Posted
What is it with Taylor Made - almost every single club they make (with the exception of the TP models) has a shaft 6 inches longer than everything else out there and is a full club stronger in loft. Before long they'll come out with a 21 degree pitching wedge.

Loft isn't any stronger than before, its a driver. Shaft is longer and the club is lighter.

And as is, the club is longer than anything I have swung before. I'm not the only one, check out WRX and some other reviews. There are alot of pro's bagging it right now albiet w/o the stock shaft at a shorter length.

Posted
Longer yes, straighter no. The longer the shaft, the harder it is to hit straight. There is a reason most tour players play thier drivers around 44.5".

I was surprised how straight the club was at 46.5". I had impact tape on the face and contact was solid.


Posted
Longer yes, straighter no. The longer the shaft, the harder it is to hit straight. There is a reason most tour players play thier drivers around 44.5".

Man, you sound like a broken record. Every time someone posts about a long shafted driver, you write the same response.

You make it seem like the club is impossible to hit. Have you swung this club? I have and it's fine. Not my preference but it does just fine. BTW, Where are you coming up with 44.5" as the average length for a tour player's driver?

Whoever came up with the saying, "A bad day of golf is better than a good day at work", is a moron.


Posted
With the cost, its a moot point for me and probably many on here. I just cant plop down that kind of cash for brand new technology that probably wont help someone with my skill level a noticeable amount, if at all. I played last weekend 2 drivers in my bag and their combined cost was under $50 new and I can hit both of them decent, just cant make a decision on which one to use so Ive left both of them in the bag.

In my bag
Driver-top flite cannon 460 cc 10.5 deg, reg flex
3 Wood-ACUITY GOLF RCX 14°
3h-warrior golf tcp 20°
4h-warrior golf tcp 23°5h-warrior golf tcp 26° 6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 SERIES irons steel shafts regular flex56° sw-tour seriesram puttergolf balls-intech beta ti


Posted
With the cost, its a moot point for me and probably many on here. I just cant plop down that kind of cash for brand new technology that probably wont help someone with my skill level a noticeable amount, if at all. I played last weekend 2 drivers in my bag and their combined cost was under $50 new and I can hit both of them decent, just cant make a decision on which one to use so Ive left both of them in the bag.

I believe this is one of the cheaper, new designs out there at $250. That is cheaper than the R9, FT-iz, and G15.


Posted
Well i guess i havent seen it for that price yet and I guess you have a point there, havent really been looking for the best price.

In my bag
Driver-top flite cannon 460 cc 10.5 deg, reg flex
3 Wood-ACUITY GOLF RCX 14°
3h-warrior golf tcp 20°
4h-warrior golf tcp 23°5h-warrior golf tcp 26° 6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 SERIES irons steel shafts regular flex56° sw-tour seriesram puttergolf balls-intech beta ti


Posted
I got mine for $200 on ebay. I think $250 is the standard price for it, I've never seen if for more than that.

Syncro bag
Superfast Burner 9.5° S driver
G5 4-PW irons
Burner '08 22° 4h
53° wedge 56° wedge iN Li'l Wack-E putter PD Long ballSlowly working on upgrading my old bargain bin clubs.


Posted
Loft isn't any stronger than before, its a driver. Shaft is longer and the club is lighter.

You're right, I was purely having a dig at TM. I'm not sure there's many pros 'bagging it', not in its off the shelf variant anyway - the face is a few degrees closed, so in the hands of a good player it'll hook the hell out of anything! Perhaps there is a TP version, but still, I reckon there's more R9s out there than there are Burner Superfasts.

The Burner superfast, as are most TM clubs, who are only concerned with distance, not control or accuracy. It's' for guys who like to bust drives all day long at the driving range, so they can brag to their teenage buddies how far up the fence they can hit the occasional shot. It is clubs like the Burner Superfast that are responsible for the increasing internet driving distance of amateur golfers they hit one good one to the back of a range and that immediately becomes their driving average. sigh. I'd much sooner take my current driving distance along with the consistency my current driver gives me, rather than add another 5% or whatever it is TM reckon the Burner Superfast gives you, and the inconsistency the 46.5 shaft brings.
In the bag...

G10 9° Driver
G10 17° 4 Wood
G10 21° Hybrid i15 4-PW Tour-W Wedges 50/12 & 56/10 Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 (35")Balls - Bridgestone B330-RX

Posted
A few pro's that have used the club this year:
Retief Goosen, CHIII, Sergio, Dustin Johnson, Y E Yang, and Justin Rose

There is a TP version available which I believe can be pre-ordered but is not completely available yet (dont hold me to it). A few of these players have been photographed using the TP and the regular head. NO they do not play it at the standard length, with the standard shaft, and the head is most likely bent open. At the events each vendor has a trailer available to pros gaming their equipment to build/adjust clubs for.

No one mentioned average distances or claimed to bomb it 300yds each time they grip the club. My point was simply to state that it was by far longer than anything I have hit and was surprisingly straight with the long shaft.

I am happy you are happy with your current club. This was just to give you my experience with the club.

Note: This thread is 5407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.