Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5682 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So today I had a 48* Vokey wedge bent to 46* so I could replace my set's Pitching Wedge.

The AP1 pitching wedge is listed as 45* and 6* bounce.

My Vokey is now at 46* and 4* bounce.

Do you think this low 4* bounce is going to be ok for a pitching wedge?

I figure most of my pitching wedge use is 90-110 yard shots from the fairway, sometimes light rough, and for chipping around the fringe. So I think it might be ok. Thoughts?

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Posted
i highly doubt the vast majority of people could tell the difference of two degrees of bounce, so no, i would think your in the clear.

Some things to keep in mind,

The difference in desighn between the vokey and ap1 are pretty big. the vokey is in essence a blade, whereas the ap1 is a hefty cavity back with weight low and to the back, so just because the two clubs are the same loft doesnt mean they will go the same distance, so dont be suprised if your vokey comes up a little shorter than your ap1 did.

however, nice choice on dropping the PW, i have been looking to replace mine for quite some time now

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...


Posted
i highly doubt the vast majority of people could tell the difference of two degrees of bounce, so no, i would think your in the clear.

Somewhat the opposite. Blades go farther with the same loft, not the other way around. That's why sets of blades have weaker lofts.


Posted
Somewhat the opposite. Blades go farther with the same loft, not the other way around. That's why sets of blades have weaker lofts.

Depends..... Blades will send the ball out lower, so if the person can't get the ball in the air real easy then they will lose distance. But if they do have a high launch, then the ball will go futher.

Driver: 909D3 8.5* Diamana White Board X
3 Wood: MP 630 15* GRAFALLOY PROLAUNCH RED X
Hybrid: 909H 19* "Real" VooDoo X
3 - P: MP-68 KBS Tour Black Nickel X
56* 10 Wedge Vr60* 06 Wedge: VrPutter: Custom Made.Golf Ball: TOUR B330SI am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was....


Posted
Somewhat the opposite. Blades go farther with the same loft, not the other way around. That's why sets of blades have weaker lofts.

On what do you base this information? Lofts are based on what the manufacturer wants to make them. And I can assure you that "blade" (inverted commas because it is an over-used and often incorrect term) clubs are not scaled back to make them comparable in length to GI clubs. It's more a case of a lot of GI clubs having stronger lofts to make stupid consumers think they are hitting the ball further, when really, someone's 6 iron is the same a s someone else's 5 iron.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
Somewhat the opposite. Blades go farther with the same loft, not the other way around. That's why sets of blades have weaker lofts.

here is my perspective, blades were the old clubs, so they have older lofts, and lets be real here, most new blades have PW at 47.

when you start moving weight lower, you hit hte ball higher, so in order to keep the ball from just going up, you decrease loft to move the ball outward, while still being high. i can safely say i have played ALOT of sets of irons over the years, i have never had a set of blades that my stock shot went farther than a cavity back with the same shaft and same loft. AKA my Mizzy MP32 pw goes right on 143, my R7tp with the same loft/shaft went more like 150 with the same swing. Maybe thats just me, but hey, good luck with the new wedge, if you decide your not a fan of it, shoot me a pm!

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...


Posted
here is my perspective, blades were the old clubs, so they have older lofts, and lets be real here, most new blades have PW at 47.

47° is fairly weak for a PW anymore. 45-46° is more common for GI cavity backs. Some clubs, like the Wilson Di9s, are even worse. They have a 42° PW.

On what do you base this information? Lofts are based on what the manufacturer wants to make them. And I can assure you that "blade" (inverted commas because it is an over-used and often incorrect term) clubs are not scaled back to make them comparable in length to GI clubs. It's more a case of a lot of GI clubs having stronger lofts to make stupid consumers think they are hitting the ball further, when really, someone's 6 iron is the same a s someone else's 5 iron.

Generally speaking, cavity back clubs hit the ball higher. When Ping made the first cavity back clubs, they had to deloft them a bit to make them comparable to the irons of the day. Today, if you look at a manufacturer's lofts, the blades are usually weaker than the cavities. Nike Victory red, for example, are 47° PW for the blade, and 45° PW for the full cavity. Mizuno's MP series PWs are 47°. Their MX-100, 200, and 300's PW is 45°, and their MX-1000's PW is 44°.


Posted
As Shanks said... When Ping made the first cavity back clubs, they had to deloft them a bit to make them comparable to the irons of the day.

That's because the cavity back popped the ball up in the air more; slight deloft helped prevent distance loss. Then, the marketing guys went crazy and started the chronic delofting ... 6i becomes 5i in loft. You know the rest!

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That's because the cavity back popped the ball up in the air more; slight deloft helped prevent distance loss. Then, the marketing guys went crazy and started the chronic delofting ... 6i becomes 5i in loft. You know the rest!

yes, and now they've strenthened the lofts so much we don't need the 3 iron anymore, and in some cases the 4 iron. This also allows them to sell more wedges, instead of just needing a 56, now the have us convinced we need 48, 52, 56, 60 and maybe even a 64... give me a break. 14 clubs is 14 clubs, they just have different numbers on them these days...

Cheers, Allan

In my Ping Hoofer II bag: Titleist 975J | Callaway Big Bertha 3 Wood S2H2 | Mizuno Fli-Hi 18˚ Hybrid | Mizuno MP-33 3-PW | Cleveland Tour Action 900 54/60 | Ping Anser II BeCu | Titleist ProV1

My Playground: Northview G&CC


Posted
Well.... I'm glad I could start a debate. Sorry. That wasn't my intent. Thanks for the first couple of responses. They were helpful. I love the feel of my Vokey wedges (and quite frankly, hit them more consistantly than any of my other clubs) so the thought of changing out one of my "regular" clubs to add another Vokey was very appealing to me. Glad to hear the bounce angle should be a problem. I'm sure I'll learn soon enough if there is any distance difference and will adjust accordingly.

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Note: This thread is 5682 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.