Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5814 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Though they're saying that officials are trying to get 2 automatic BCS bids for the top 2 teams in the conference.. presumably top of each division? Might not lead to a championship game.

I think NCAA rules are that any conference with 12 or more teams must have a conference championship game.


Posted
I'm not quite sure how all this happened, why the mass exodus? Do schools have contracts with their conf?

My understanding is that it all started with the Big 10 saying they wanted to expand to at least 12 teams, but maybe 16 teams and create a "super conference" which would dominate the sports landscape. With that domination would come lots of $$$ for the Big 10 network and would threaten other conference's profits. So other big conferences decided they needed to expand too, and one of the first targets for acquisition was Texas. While Texas was talking to the Big 10 and Pac 10, they were (and still are) telling the other teams in their conference that they were going to stay. Colorado and Nebraska read the writing on the wall, and bail on the Big 12. Texas, Texas Tech, Ok and OK St. will follow suit to the Pac 10 in a package deal, expanding the Pac 10 to 15 teams. Right now the Big 10 is at 12 teams, and the Mountain West, the other big player in all this, is at 10 teams. The Big 12 will be left with 6 teams; the Mountain West is interested in some of them, like Missu, Kansas and K State, and I've heard the SEC may be interested in Missu as well.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think Kansas and Kansas State will end up in the Mountain West, making it 12 teams for them and the Big 12 automatic bid should be transfered to them. The real question is where will Baylor, Rice, Iowa State, and the other leftover teams from the Big 12 go.

Rice isn't in the Big 12. The teams on the outside looking in will be Kansas, Kansas St., Iowa St. and Missouri. Although I think at least Kansas and Missouri will go to the Mountain West.


Posted
Rice isn't in the Big 12. The teams on the outside looking in will be Kansas, Kansas St., Iowa St. and Missouri. Although I think at least Kansas and Missouri will go to the Mountain West.

You're right, my bad. I've heard in different places that K St and Kansas won't separate and are a package deal. Also, in the Albuqerque paper today they said TCU would object to Baylor going to the Mountain West, so who knows where they'll end up. Maybe in the WAC.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My understanding is that it all started with the Big 10 saying they wanted to expand to at least 12 teams, but maybe 16 teams and create a "super conference" which would dominate the sports landscape. With that domination would come lots of $$$ for the Big 10 network and would threaten other conference's profits. So other big conferences decided they needed to expand too, and one of the first targets for acquisition was Texas. While Texas was talking to the Big 10 and Pac 10, they were (and still are) telling the other teams in their conference that they were going to stay. Colorado and Nebraska read the writing on the wall, and bail on the Big 12. Texas, Texas Tech, Ok and OK St. will follow suit to the Pac 10 in a package deal, expanding the Pac 10 to 15 teams. Right now the Big 10 is at 12 teams, and the Mountain West, the other big player in all this, is at 10 teams. The Big 12 will be left with 6 teams; the Mountain West is interested in some of them, like Missu, Kansas and K State, and I've heard the SEC may be interested in Missu as well.

If that happens it looks like the Big 12 would turn into a mid major conf. Asa Gator fan it wouldn't bother me to see Mizzou. join the SEC. Especially since I have a good buddy who's a Mizzou fan and it gives us something else to argue about.

Btw, love the avatar.
my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5814 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Haiduk - Archdevil        
    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.