Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

"On Learning Golf" by Percy Boomer

4 posts / 16559 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

"On Learning Golf" by Percy Boomer deals with teaching/learning "feel" by positioning. The book has one purpose and that's to teach a player how to find there swing when they loose it.

It's all Percy deals with - there's few pictures, no tips, nothing on equipment. This is good because the swing described is from the Bobby Jones era. However, it's easy enough to fit a conventional swing into Percy's words.

Take the shoulder tilt. He tells us to initiate it with a knee bend towards the ball, weight towards the target, rotating around the back leg -  followed by swing in a barrel with no hip slide!  So I add the hip slide.

He's really good with words, and best of all doesn't make up words, doesn't use medical terms - simple bone head English.

The same fundamentals are covered in unique ways (such as arguments with his students) throughout the book. You just need to update them a bit.

What's really an eye opener is how much the knees affect the club face. Nobody else talks about that.

It's out of print but Amazon has it, and it's not expensive. I discovered the book from all the 5 star ratings on Amazon. (There's far better written reviews then what I'm capable of.)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A good companion book is "How to Perfect Your Golf Swing" by Jimmy Ballard.

Same phliosphy as Boomer - the golf swing is initiated from the ground up using feet/knees. Only Ballard has the diagrams and pictures. Ballard uses a more modern Hogan Swing as an example only he uses different words to describe the indescribable "feel" then Hogan does in 5 Lessons.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my favorite golf swing book, published in 1946. I read it every year and find something new each time. Golf Digest just came out with its list of 50 golf books every golfer should read. This one was #5 on the list. 

It's a sleeper. Highly influential even today, though everybody has forgotten the source. No, he didn't invent this stuff, but his explanations are masterful. Go to Amazon and read the reviews there. I can't recommend it strongly enough.

Boomer taught for most of his career in France, and won the Belgian, Swiss, and Dutch Opens in the 1920s. His brother, Aubrey, finshed 2nd to Bobby Jones in the British Open in 1927, and won numerous European championships.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • More on Doak's scale.  Thinking it over, it's really two scales--6-10 are a way to rate the world's top courses.  1-5 is a way to rate the rest of the world.  3 is average, 1 is awful, 5 is really good, 4's would be 5's except for some drawback, and 2's are either 3's in lousy shape or 1's with some TLC.  It seems to me that most of this crowd ought to be able to find an accessible 4 or 5.  Depending on where you live. Two further observations--yes, the scale is subjective, but any course that the USGA uses for qualifying or regional events probably rates as a 5 (unless it's in the top half of the scale).  And, the scale doesn't address what to do with a course that has the bones to be a 6-10, but is the victim of hard times or poor maintenance.  The Fallen Angel problem is a conundrum, and, unless Doak has blotted out the memory of Apache Stronghold, he's aware of it.
    • I've played Duke… what's tricky about it? It feels like a pretty straightforward course to me. Define "tricky" too…?
    • OSU came out and trashed UNC last night, 74 to 49!  Some awesome facts from the game 1. OSU Became just the 4th team ever to beat two top 10 teams by 25 points in the same season.  2. It was the 2nd largest of victory against UNC at UNC in school history. 3. OSU held UNC to their lowest field goal percentage ever at home.  4. OSU out rebounded UNC 48 to 32! EFFORT!!!  If you tell me that OSU beat UNC team when Kaleb Wesson only had 10 points I would have said no way. This team has way more options to go to than a year ago. 
    • Today I played a round at my home course where they are preparing the course for a tournament this weekend.  One bunker had a portion that had accidentally gotten wet when watering the green yesterday.  Made it hard underneath.  As dad and me were practicing and there were only two others on the course, I took the opportunity to play three clubs out of the greenside bunker.  Both the sand and lob wedge in traditional bunker type explosion shots didn't work as it didn't dig in and give me a cushion of sand from which the ball flew out.  Both got out but were essentially thinned.  I hit a PW and essentially picked it out fairly cleanly.  Because it was a fairly low bunker wall it worked with a chip type shot. What this taught me was that I would rather not have badly maintained bunkers since you can't play a bunker shot to get out.  Removing badly maintained bunkers is a much better option for good play.  You do not want a situation where two people with the same lie, next to each other in a bunker need to hit different types of shots to get out
    • You do get two club lengths to go back and stay in the teeing area… By my measurements, it's < 210 yards to cover the water, and 80 yards wide. I'd be really tempted to cut a 3W every time. Forget going over - go around. And if you really, really cut it, it'll fly shorter but cut more, and probably be safe again. It's as little as about 180 if you don't take an angle toward the back of the green.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Augie
      (61 years old)
    2. Dukes1304
      (34 years old)
    3. Mmgolfwiz
      (56 years old)

  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...