Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4262 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry, 'wore' = 'wire' but this forum won't let me edit it for some reason... here it is without typos:

Hi I've got the same problem and the solution:
In the longest/biggest pocket, there's an access pocket at the bottom to the base so you can fiddle inside( probably designed for when you drop something inside). Use a torch and look at the horse-shoe shaped wire that inserts into two small sleeves on either side to internally support the base, pockets and structure of the bag, this structural wire is opposite the hole where the leg wires exit the base of the bag. You see: when you shove a club down into the bag, some grips/ club butts disconnect that horse shoe shaped structural wire. That in-turn slackens the base and the legs do not re-tract correctly. That stupid horse shoe shaped structural wire comes out of the sewn-in internal sleeves too easily, in fact, I bet most on this forum will find the wire has torn through the sleeves or worse, put holes internally in the bag. The wire can also damage your grips if you've got soft winn wraps...

As for the dude twisting the leg wires, all your doing is increasing tension by twisting the sewn in strap at the base of the bag and you don't want to tear out that strap by the seems. There should be a 1/2 twist in the leg wires due to the wires hooking in from the outside-in on the legs and the plastic piece mounted half way up the wires should read with the PING logo facing outwards(to the ground) not inwards(to the bag).


All in all, a very weak design by Ping. Also, as someone who owns a faded original 1997 hoofer with love, my C-1 is an embarrassment to ping. It looks sweet but it's just another piece of rubbish made in the East. I now doubt Ping as a brand but always thought it to be the most technically sound brand of them all. I wish Wishon golf would invest in some awesome bags but I guess sun-mountain and a few others are now the best as Ping hoofers used to be for our age group when we were juniors.

Let me know if you understood my post, I'm sure it'll all make sense once you've had a look inside with a torch or in good light. By the way, that wire will keep coming out when you snag it with a club, happy C-1-ing!!! Thanks PING! :-/


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
I have 2 older Hoofers, one I've used for the last 15 years. I've never had a problem with either other than drastic color fading on the first. Nothing is crossed with the legs/supports on either one. Has something changed recently with their design? Could it be the whole made in China so quality stinks thing?

I recently bought the 2014 PING Hoofer and the legs are great! No issues with quality. I had the Ping Latitude bag from a few years ago and the legs did hang down a bit when carrying. I gave PING bags another chance and I don't regret my new purchase, although it was a little expensive at $230 cdn.

What's in my bag... Driver: Taylormade Aero Burner TP (10.5 degree) Fujikura Speeder 6.2 V.C. X-stiff 3-wood: Taylormade RBZ (15 degree) Hybrid: PING i15 (20 degree) Irons: PING S55 (4-W) with DG x100 Wedges: PING Tour s (50, 54 and 60 degree) Putter: Scotty Cameron Select Newport 1.5


Posted
I never had a problem with the legs, but I did have a problem with the grips getting hung up un the bottom of the dividers. I got tired of fighting with my bag to get my clubs out, and I switched to a Sun Mountain 3.5. I really liked the Hoofer, and would not hesitate to get another if they make the dividers longer. Also, I liked the old color choices. I liked the solid navy or green.

Note: This thread is 4262 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.