Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5647 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just purchased the Nike CCi Forged 3-PW set on eBay with the DG SL S300 shafts in them. I had no problems with the DG S300's but thought I would give these shafts a try. 6 iron swing speed is at around 85-88 mph so I think the lighter weight in these new shafts should fit me better. Hopefully the ball flight doesn't change too much from going to lighter shafts.

« Keith »


Posted
I bought a set of cci forged in the spring and I have to say I love the look at set up but I lost 10 yards with them. I did have them to my specs but I just couldn't handle the yardage loss. I doubt you will have the same issue but I would like to hear your feedback after a round.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
i found them really hard to hit
VERY VERY blade like

hope u can hit em better than me
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
Haha your responses are scaring me before I even get them in my hands. I have a sprained right thumb and by the time I recover it will be some time from now. I'll let you guys know. Only guy I know on tour that used them recently is Stewart Cink. Don't know if any of the other Nike staffers gamed them.

« Keith »


Posted
Haha your responses are scaring me before I even get them in my hands. I have a sprained right thumb and by the time I recover it will be some time from now. I'll let you guys know. Only guy I know on tour that used them recently is Stewart Cink. Don't know if any of the other Nike staffers gamed them.

Immelman when he won the Masters.

As for the clubs. I still game them. I've always liked them. I will have to say that they are a bit shorter of an iron, but you simply compensate for it. Some won't put up w/ that or won't want that, but if you know your distances, I don't think it's that big of deal. As for hitting them. They are more of a players club. I wouldn't recommend them to an inexperienced or high HCP golfer. I won't go as far as to call them "blade" like, but they do require you to have a decent ball striking skill to hit well. But, oh how sweet they are, IMO. Soft as butter feeling off the face, sharp look to them, nice look at address, good weighting to them, etc. Great set of irons.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Posted
i found them really hard to hit

Have you ever thought about making a steel-review thread? We could sticky it, and likely have 80% of all modern clubs reviewed in one place. :)

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
Have you ever thought about making a steel-review thread? We could sticky it, and likely have 80% of all modern clubs reviewed in one place. :)

man ur full of them this week, arent you!!?? hahhaah!

probably true tho i have hit/owned a lot of gear........... meh.....
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
man ur full of them this week, arent you!!?? hahhaah!

ha ha, i didn't even mean that one to be a zinger. I'm sorry man.

Seriously though, it's good to have product input from a single source. To the OP - I was always curious about these. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
ha ha, i didn't even mean that one to be a zinger. I'm sorry man.

yea no worries man, i can take it! hahaha!

these irons are a thing of beauty for sure i did have them w PJX shafts tho, which i am not a fan of maybe w DG's in them, wrx will find them a little easier to hit? @ Nike_Golf - dude if you cant call these blade like from address, i dont know what u can I have owned blades too and these resemble them in every way low offset, thin topline, thinner sole, not forgiving in any way shape or form etc...... VERY blade like IMO
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I think the CCi forged are shorter in length by 0.25" than my VR split cavities but I'm hoping the lightness of the shaft will offset that. My first time trying out DGSL shafts so I'm more curious in how these shafts feel.

« Keith »


Posted
damn...to bad u didnt deicde this 2 weeks ago
i would have bought ur spilt cav's fo sho... ;)
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
@ Nike_Golf - dude if you cant call these blade like from address, i dont know what u can

You're actually making me feel better about my game by saying these things are ALMOST blades.

So, I really DON'T want to disagree with you but I still (kinda) will. My current set of these irons is the third set of irons I've ever owned. I've hit a blade iron a few times but I know I'm not ready to go that route yet. So, I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have much experience with blades to compare this set to. BUT, these are still a cavity back iron with weighting in them to make them forgiving. BTW, I really have to disagree with your take that these have ZERO forgiveness. While not much, they do have SOME. My misses are off the toe. When I do that I immediately feel it, obviously, but the ball relatively stays on line. The distance is obviously altered though. So, by definition, you can't really compare them to blades just based on the thin top line, smaller head, etc. That's the MO of a "players" iron. Not as easy to hit as a GI iron but easier than a blade. But, really, are you saying that since I hit these well that I should look into getting blades? Feel free to say yes. I need an excuse to get the new Nike VR combo set this winter.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Posted
You're actually making me feel better about my game by saying these things are ALMOST blades.

dude u r askin the wrong guy

i will never talk anyone out of new irons ;)
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
dude u r askin the wrong guy

haha, thats halarious. Dont you have the taylormade R9 Tp irons too? which ones do you like better the titleist 710 cb's or the R9 tp's?


Posted
I recently purchased a CCi 2i. This is my first 2i, so I can only compare it to the 3i I have hit before, and I find it harder to hit (smaller sweet spot) than both my current MP-57 (CB) and my previous set, MP-32 (MB). Again, I am comparing a 2i vs 3i, so what I think is not necessarily true.
The CCi is a really good looking club, though.

Clubs in my bag: TaylorMade R7 SuperDeep TP 9.5° Fujikura Speeder 757 S | Titleist 906F2 13° AccuFLEX ICON FH X| Adams Idea Pro Black 18° Aldila NV Pro 105-S| Mizuno MP-57 3-7; MP-32 8-P PX6.0 | Mizuno MP T-10 54.09, 60.05
My bags and cart: Titleist Carry Bag | Mizuno Omega V + Clicgear 2.0


Posted
damn...to bad u didnt deicde this 2 weeks ago

I believe when the season comes around I would most likely still game the VR's regularly. I was going to toy around with the CCi's and may put the shafts into the VR's if anything.

« Keith »


Posted
I wouldn't say they are as hard to hit as true blades. In fact I don't think they are any harder to hit than my s57s but they just don't go as far.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
The stock length seems to be 37.75" on the 5 iron compared to the normal 38". Might possibly be why these irons play slightly shorter.

« Keith »


Note: This thread is 5647 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
    • Wordle 1,789 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.