Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5454 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I started playing golf three years ago, and it's time to replace the extremely overworked Taylormade RacOS2's that my dad bought me to start me off.  I've played a lot over the the course of three years, and I've managed to work my way down to about a six handicap.  I wouldn't say my ball striking is the best part of my game, but I get around the course.  I went to get a club fitting at my local Golf Galaxy, and, according to the data, I hit the Burner 2.0's best.  However, I was also interested in the Titleist AP2's, the JPX 800's and the JPX 800 Pro's.  I also hear good things about the new Taylormade Forged 2011 Irons.  I do like the 2.0's, but I don't know if it's time to switch to more of a player's iron.  I've improved fairly consistently over three years, and I hope to improve further in the next three.  I'm worried about buying the super-forgiving, caste 2.0's and being stuck with them for the next three years.  Any suggestions are appreciated.


Posted


Originally Posted by thofre

So I started playing golf three years ago, and it's time to replace the extremely overworked Taylormade RacOS2's that my dad bought me to start me off.  I've played a lot over the the course of three years, and I've managed to work my way down to about a six handicap.  I wouldn't say my ball striking is the best part of my game, but I get around the course.  I went to get a club fitting at my local Golf Galaxy, and, according to the data, I hit the Burner 2.0's best.  However, I was also interested in the Titleist AP2's, the JPX 800's and the JPX 800 Pro's.  I also hear good things about the new Taylormade Forged 2011 Irons.  I do like the 2.0's, but I don't know if it's time to switch to more of a player's iron.  I've improved fairly consistently over three years, and I hope to improve further in the next three.  I'm worried about buying the super-forgiving, caste 2.0's and being stuck with them for the next three years.  Any suggestions are appreciated.


3 years and down to a 6? That's pretty good, it took me 6 years to get down around there.

When you say you hit the 2.0's best, do you mean shot dispersion or distance. You will naturally hit the burners farther than any other standard set. The 2.0's. are a half inch longer and the loft is about a club strong. If you hit a 7, you're really hitting a 6. Don't get me wrong, they are a nice club, I had the luxury of hitting them last fall. Not a fan of the black finish on an iron, that will wear quick.

The AP2's are a sick set of sticks. They provide the workability of a forged iron, yet leave plenty of room for forgiveness. Definitely try them out in a Project X if you can, they are a mean set. They are a sexy club, and the performance is unmatched by any set like it.

The Mizuno JPX800 are also a nice set. Mizuno makes some serious irons, second best next to Titleist in my opinion (I'm a Titleist guy). Although if I ever got a set other than Titleist Mizuno would be my top priority. Very smooth, and their grain flow forged irons are orgasmic they are so crisp and the feel is through the roof. I have not seen nor hit the pro set though, so I can't help you out there.

titleist.gif 910 D2 10.5 -- Diamana A'hina X
titleist.gif 909 F3 15.0 --  Matrix Ozik X-Con
titleist.gif 910 CB 4-PW -- Project X 6.0
cleveland.gif CG10 52, 56, 60.
cameron.gif   Studio Design 1.0   titleist.gif Pro V1    c2_beer.gif It's a Wisconsin thing.

Posted

I'd buy these.  2009 Callaway X-Forged for $399.  Player's Cavity sized head, and surprisingly forgiving.

http://www.rockbottomgolf.com/callaway-golf-x-forged-irons-set.html


Posted

The Titleist AP2 iron is amazing, and I absolutely love mine.  They cut like butter when you catch them right, and have a surprising amount of forgiveness, something that will always help.  I can work them consistantly both ways, and they look great at address, and I would buy the exact same set I bought 5 months ago if you gave me $600 dollars today.  I highly recommend, and let me know if you have any other questions.

Cheers.

Whats in my 14 Way Stand Bag?? Just...
taylormade.gif Superfast TP 8.5* Matrix HD6 Stiff
taylormade.gif '07 Burner 5 wood 18* Snr. 50g
titleist.gif 710 AP2 3-PW w/ Dy. Gold S300
taylormade.gif Z TP 52* 8* stock wedgeflexscratch.gif 8620 56* with D/S grindcallaway.gif 2009 Forged X-Tour 60* 10* bounce stock wedgeflexcameron.gif Pro Platinum Laguna 2.5, 32.5inches


Posted

The callaway x forged mentioned above are only offered in extra stiff on rockbottomgolf.com.  I was also interested but that was a deal breaker. If youre swing is fast enough though, go for it

In my bag:
Titleist 910 D3 9.5 Degree
TaylorMade R11 3 Wood 15.5 Degree
Adams A12 19 Degree
Cleveland CG16 Tour Irons 4-PW

Taylormade rac Gap 52 Degree, Cleveland CG15 56 Degree, Cleveland CG14 60 Deg

Odyssey 2-Ball


Posted

To the OP:

You play to a 5.8, what are the best are worst parts of your game?  What is your GIR %, and where are most of your strokes coming from.  If you are younger and aspire to improve (who doesn't) you'll likely grow into an AP2/X Forged or other players cavity.  There really isn't a limit to what these clubs can do, but there are limitations for irons like the Burner 2.0 and other GI sets.  Sounds like you know this already :)  There are tour players gaming GI irons in partial sets, you could consider that as well.

I purchased the old Titleist 962 cavities when I was 16, and that set carried me from a 15 handicap to a 5 over the course of about 7 years.  These would be similar to something like a mp52/mp53 or other players CB today.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted


You play to a 5.8, what are the best are worst parts of your game?  What is your GIR %, and where are most of your strokes coming from.  If you are younger and aspire to improve (who doesn't) you'll likely grow into an AP2/X Forged or other players cavity.  There really isn't a limit to what these clubs can do, but there are limitations for irons like the Burner 2.0 and other GI sets.  Sounds like you know this already :)  There are tour players gaming GI irons in partial sets, you could consider that as well.

I purchased the old Titleist 962 cavities when I was 16, and that set carried me from a 15 handicap to a 5 over the course of about 7 years.  These would be similar to something like a mp52/mp53 or other players CB today.



I am curious how your recommendation would change according to the OP answer on GIR. Which of his club options listed would you recommend for a relatively low GIR compared to a higher GIR ? Are you suggesting that of the clubs he list, some are better then others from the ruff ? Or ? Anyhow, just curious , thanks Camo



When a company makes a club in the USA I will proudly display their brand here. All of mine were made in china by somebody making $2 a day. Shame on you Mr club manufacture.


Posted


Originally Posted by Camo

I am curious how your recommendation would change according to the OP answer on GIR.Which of his club options listed would you recommend for a relatively low GIR compared to a higher GIR ?Are you suggesting that of the clubs he list, some are better then others from the ruff ? Or ? Anyhow, just curious , thanksCamo


GIR can be a rough indication of ball striking with the irons.  Ideally we'd look at a players average distance from the intended iron shot, but many golfers don't pace off this statistic.

Obviously GIRs are pretty dependent upon accuracy off the tee, but at a sub-6 handicap it's likely that the OP finds the fairway or light rough often enough.  If his GIRs are low and his ballstriking isn't strong, he would see the most benefit from a more forgiving iron set.  If perhaps his GIRs is high and his putting keeping him shooting near 80, then a players club could be a better fit.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
Apologies to the op for hijacking your thread but 1 more question. I do not currently keep track of my GIR but if I start should I keep separate stats for GIR with driver vrs irons ? I know for me my iron GIR would be considerably higher.

When a company makes a club in the USA I will proudly display their brand here. All of mine were made in china by somebody making $2 a day. Shame on you Mr club manufacture.


Posted


Originally Posted by thofre

So I started playing golf three years ago, and it's time to replace the extremely overworked Taylormade RacOS2's that my dad bought me to start me off.  I've played a lot over the the course of three years, and I've managed to work my way down to about a six handicap.  I wouldn't say my ball striking is the best part of my game, but I get around the course.  I went to get a club fitting at my local Golf Galaxy, and, according to the data, I hit the Burner 2.0's best.  However, I was also interested in the Titleist AP2's, the JPX 800's and the JPX 800 Pro's.  I also hear good things about the new Taylormade Forged 2011 Irons.  I do like the 2.0's, but I don't know if it's time to switch to more of a player's iron.  I've improved fairly consistently over three years, and I hope to improve further in the next three.  I'm worried about buying the super-forgiving, caste 2.0's and being stuck with them for the next three years.  Any suggestions are appreciated.


Which guy do you want to be? Titleist guy, Mizuno guy or TaylorMade guy? This isn't an irons choice dude, it's a lifestyle choice.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

My GIR with a driver is very low.

Originally Posted by Camo

Apologies to the op for hijacking your thread but 1 more question.

I do not currently keep track of my GIR but if I start should I keep separate stats for GIR with driver vrs irons ?

I know for me my iron GIR would be considerably higher.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted




Cantankerous guy brings the funnay ....and the truth....LMAO



When a company makes a club in the USA I will proudly display their brand here. All of mine were made in china by somebody making $2 a day. Shame on you Mr club manufacture.


Posted

Thanks for all the feedback.  To address the dispersion/distance argument, I was hitting the 2.0's considerably further according to the monitor, (over 195 with a 6 iron compared to 180 with the AP2's), but the smash factor (ball speed/clubhead speed) was also much nearer 1.5 (the average tour pro's smash factor) with the 2.0's than with the AP2's, which much of the reason for my concern.  To address the GIR%, my percentage over the last two years, (spanning roughly the time I was a 12 handicap to now), is about 40%.  Though, now, I would say I hit between 9 and 11 greens per round.  I know it's supposed to be a little higher based on my handicap, which is why I'm having doubts about getting the AP2's or JPX Pro's.


Posted

Can't compare a Burner 6 iron to a AP2 6 iron.  The Burner is a full 4* stronger.  Either distance is much higher than average, I'd just get the set that you're most accurate with.

Originally Posted by thofre

Thanks for all the feedback.  To address the dispersion/distance argument, I was hitting the 2.0's considerably further according to the monitor, (over 195 with a 6 iron compared to 180 with the AP2's), but the smash factor (ball speed/clubhead speed) was also much nearer 1.5 (the average tour pro's smash factor) with the 2.0's than with the AP2's, which much of the reason for my concern.  To address the GIR%, my percentage over the last two years, (spanning roughly the time I was a 12 handicap to now), is about 40%.  Though, now, I would say I hit between 9 and 11 greens per round.  I know it's supposed to be a little higher based on my handicap, which is why I'm having doubts about getting the AP2's or JPX Pro's.




Posted

Like others have have posted, the ap2's are a SICK set of irons!!! I game them and LOVE them. I like that you can work the ball with them and still have plenty of forgiveness on less then perfect hits. I classify them as a forgiving players iron.

If I were in your shoes, i would go with what feels best. Don't get caught up in the distance thing. Of course the Taylormade 6 iron will go further. the shaft is longer and the loft is stronger. If you wanted to get a true comparison, compare the Taylormade 6 iron to the distance of the ap2 5 iron.

They are both great irons, go with what you feel with help you go lower.


Posted

Don't take my post to say that I'm knocking the Burners-they seem like nice sticks and may be perfect for you.  Just don't get them based on distance/bragging rights.


Posted

Well I just purchased a set of JPX 800 and I love them. I had a set of V3 Adams forged and took them back and exchanged them for the Mizuno’s. What a great decision that was. I have never been a Mizuno guy but have heard good things about them. After playing them for about 10 rounds I can say they are great. Love the way they feel and look.

My son that started playing Golf this past summer loved them also so  he decided to get a set of Mizuno’s as well. We picked him up a new set of MX 200's off Ebay  for a great price and he is hitting the ball better than I ever thought he would in such a short time. He broke 90 for the first time after his third time playing them. Unless you just want a newer club I would take a look at the MX line. If I had it to do over , I would have saved a lot of $$$ and go with the MX200 as well. I can’t tell much difference in the JPX vs the MX 200. Maybe a little more forgiveness but not much.

I have not hit the other clubs you are talking about but I can tell you I love these. Check them out before you make a decision.

PS: when I went to Roger Dunns to try out new clubs they put me on the monitor with the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 vs the JPX. After about 20 shots of each swapping back and forth every 5 shots, he showed me the pattern of the Mizuno vs the TM burner  2.0.  The JPX pattern was so much tighter then the TM that It was not even close. I did hit some of the shots on the TM a lot further but not near as tight of a pattern. Every shot on the JPS was within 4 yards. The Burner 2.0 was 15 yards or more. and the feel of the JPX was so cool i just could not pass on them.

Good luck.


Posted

I had the same experience with the 2.0 and the JPX. I ordered a set of JPX's based on the tighter dispersion :)

Driver: Cobra AMP 10.5* w/ orange Diamana Whiteboard, 3 Wood: TourEdge Exotics Trilogy 15*
Hybrid : TourEdge Exotics Trilogy 3I
Irons: Mizuno JPX800PRO 5-GW
Wedges: Vokey SM 56*, 64*, Cobra Big Trusty Rusty 55*
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S 43"

Note: This thread is 5454 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.