Jump to content
IGNORED

Is The Masters "easy" for Tiger Woods to win?


Note: This thread is 5029 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

A frequent poster on this site has made the claim that Tiger Woods "c" game is as good as other players' "a" game at Augusta, therefore making it easier for him to compete for the win at Augusta. Therefore, his performances at Augusta cannot be used to gauge where his swing or his game are at.

So my question is this. If The Masters is easy for Tiger, then surely it was VERY easy for Jack who won 6 or Arnold who won 4. I mean it stands to reason that men who won as many or more than Tiger has there had it just as easy right?

What say you golf fans?

Here is the quote in question from the aforementioned poster.

Originally Posted by sean_miller View Post




What I'm saying is that Tiger's C at Augusta is the equivalent of most qualifier's B+ game and his B game is as good or better than all but the top player's A+ game.

Augusta is to Tiger what Turnberry is to Tom Watson - comfort food. Tiger played fantastic at Augusta and he re-injured his knee. There's really not much more to say about Augusta (for me anyway) than that.


Well it wasn't easy this year - lolz

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.




Originally Posted by henniebogan1966

Where did Phil Mickelson and Bubba Watson finish? Oop!!! LOL


Why did you only post an excerpt of my post? Why did you start an entire thread as an homage to a single comment I made? Did my post touch your heart in some special way?  Is this Tom Cruise?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.




Originally Posted by sean_miller

Why did you only post an excerpt of my post? Why did you start an entire thread as an homage to a single comment I made? Did my post touch your heart in some special way?  Is this Tom Cruise?



Actually I asked a question with this post, using your statement as the jumping off point for discussion.

Hey, I thought you weren't going to respond to me anymore? LOL


Is it "easy for Tiger to win the Masters?" No. But is it "relatively easier for Tiger to play well at the Masters?" Yes.

Having a wealth of knowledge and good memories can be a strong confidence boost. That said, I don't think that's why he played well this year. If that had been the case, he would have gotten the most help on the greens, where he was terrible this year. Last year though his swing was downright abysmal and he still came in fourth. He managed his way around a golf course that he has played more than all but a few people in the world. I now hate myself for giving in to the trolling. Congrats.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by sean_miller

Why did you only post an excerpt of my post? Why did you start an entire thread as an homage to a single comment I made? Did my post touch your heart in some special way?  Is this Tom Cruise?

I think it's because Hennie thinks you complete him.  Or else, maybe you just had him at "hello".




Originally Posted by jamo

Is it "easy for Tiger to win the Masters?" No. But is it "relatively easier for Tiger to play well at the Masters?" Yes.

Having a wealth of knowledge and good memories can be a strong confidence boost. That said, I don't think that's why he played well this year. If that had been the case, he would have gotten the most help on the greens, where he was terrible this year. Last year though his swing was downright abysmal and he still came in fourth. He managed his way around a golf course that he has played more than all but a few people in the world. I now hate myself for giving in to the trolling. Congrats.



I appreciate your reasoned and thoughtful response based on fact, not uninformed opinion. Believe me, this isn't intended as trolling. I've been fighting for what seems like years now to have reasoned discussion about Tiger Woods, the golfer. It's nearly impossible to find people that are reasonable in thought process when it comes to Tiger.

Yes, Tiger has good memories of Augusta. So does Phil. Heck Phil has a love affair going on with the place to listen to him talk about the place. Point is, none of that guarantees either of them success at Augusta. It certainly doesn't guarantee them a win or even a top five. If it does, then what does that say about the rest of the field if we're essentially going to say before the event starts that Tiger and Phil are guaranteed a top 5 or a win?




Originally Posted by Harmonious

I think it's because Hennie thinks you complete him.  Or else, maybe you just had him at "hello".



Hardly. Mr. Miller made a foolish comment about Tiger and Augusta and now he's paying for it. That's HIS fault.




Originally Posted by henniebogan1966

Hardly. Mr. Miller made a foolish comment about Tiger and Augusta and now he's paying for it. That's HIS fault.


So your response to what you think might be a foolish comment is to start another, even more foolish, thread?  Just so you can get "revenge" or some such nonsense?  Maybe that worked over at the Golf Channel, but I don't think you will have much luck over here with your silly payback games. What are you, 12?


  • Administrator

If we had a popcorn smiley it would be getting a lot of use.

Hennie, I hereby prescribe two of these. Take them and don't call me in the morning:

hpets06_Seg3ChillPills_i-747747.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You had a fresh start but couldn't handle it.  Same old henny.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We had a rule at another message board I used to go to...

If you start a thread about someone, you lost.

-------

To answer the question though, I think playing the same course every year gives a bigger advantage to the better player, of which Tiger is the best.  I've often heard the Masters referred to as the Augusta Putting Championship.  It's relatively "easy" to hit your GIRs there, so your swing doesn't need to be as on point as some other places.  Tiger's putter isn't his main problem right now, and he knows the greens well there.

Having said that, I'm a 30-something handicap who isn't getting any better...on the verge of retirement.  I'm not allowed to comment until I win my 14 majors.

I've heard that heart surgeons have heart attacks induced before they're allowed to perform heart surgery.




Originally Posted by henniebogan1966

I appreciate your reasoned and thoughtful response based on fact, not uninformed opinion. Believe me, this isn't intended as trolling. I've been fighting for what seems like years now to have reasoned discussion about Tiger Woods, the golfer. It's nearly impossible to find people that are reasonable in thought process when it comes to Tiger.

Yes, Tiger has good memories of Augusta. So does Phil. Heck Phil has a love affair going on with the place to listen to him talk about the place. Point is, none of that guarantees either of them success at Augusta. It certainly doesn't guarantee them a win or even a top five. If it does, then what does that say about the rest of the field if we're essentially going to say before the event starts that Tiger and Phil are guaranteed a top 5 or a win?



Does is guarantee Tiger top 5? Of course not, there are few guarantees in life, but let me read off all of his Masters finishes since1997. Win, T8, T18, 5, win, win, T15, T22, T3, T2, 2, T6, T4, T4. Since 2005, he has come in the top 6 every year! That's unheard of. Tiger playing well at the Masters has become as sure an event as any in golf, even as he has played poorly.

Want me to read off Phil's finishes since 1999? T6, T7, 3, 3, 3, win, 10, win, T24, T5, T5, win, T27. Pretty much a sure thing there too.

What does that say about the rest of the field if Tiger and Phil are guaranteed a top 5 or a win? I guess they need to step their game up.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

let me just say this:

I had a strained achilies and the idea of playing golf on it is painful to think about.  Mine would be fine for days then i'd turn a corner walking normally and all of the sudden i'd feel a pull...and it was hard to walk for days and I can't imagine trying to swing a club through on that leg.  I had a boot that I would take off and have this happen forcing me to put it back on for a few days then repeat.  During that time if the achilies was acting up i'd be in constant pain shooting up my leg.

the only way I could describe it is that if you think of the strained achilies as a rubber band that is tighter than normal and sometimes the tension drastically increases in an instant momentarily.  the pain being worse the tighter it felt and the more you used it.

Bag:
Driver and 3-wood: Titleist 910D3 9.5* + 910Df 15* w/ Aldila RIP 80 X flex
2-iron: King Cobra II Forged DG-x100

3-Hybrid: 20* Adams 9031DF DG-x100
4-9 irons: Bridgestone Tour Premium DG-s400
Wedges: Vokey 200 series: 48, 54, 60 DG-s400
Putter: original Cameron Newport gunmetal blue
 




Originally Posted by StricklandPropane

We had a rule at another message board I used to go to...

If you start a thread about someone, you lost.

-------

To answer the question though, I think playing the same course every year gives a bigger advantage to the better player, of which Tiger is the best.  I've often heard the Masters referred to as the Augusta Putting Championship.  It's relatively "easy" to hit your GIRs there, so your swing doesn't need to be as on point as some other places.  Tiger's putter isn't his main problem right now, and he knows the greens well there.

Having said that, I'm a 30-something handicap who isn't getting any better...on the verge of retirement.  I'm not allowed to comment until I win my 14 majors.

I've heard that heart surgeons have heart attacks induced before they're allowed to perform heart surgery.



There's nothing won or lost here. It is a discussion board. The poster made a statement regarding Tiger Woods and The Masters that I believe was somewhat silly in theory. It is further my belief he made this comment to somehow diminish how Tiger plays at Augusta as somehow not valid in use as a barometer for where Tiger's game might be at. Now if he is right in theory, then it means that either Augusta is once again a pitch and putt for Tiger and therefore a pitch and putt for most of those in the tourney. Or, it means for those who didn't play well there or have never won there after multiple attempts, that they REALLY need some serious work on their games.

For me, I simply believe that he's wrong and way off base with his theory. These guys are all very very good players or they wouldn't be on The PGA Tour and certainly wouldn't be playing in The Masters. (with the notable exceptions being some of the past winners who long ago passed their prime on The PGA Tour.) The fact is it takes very good play, smart play, and some luck to win any major, much less at Augusta. Yes, it takes a working knowledge of the course and more specifically the greens there to contend. But make no mistake, it takes talent to win there and that talent isn't solely based on "feeling comfortable there."


Quote:

Does is guarantee Tiger top 5? Of course not, there are few guarantees in life, but let me read off all of his Masters finishes since1997. Win, T8, T18, 5, win, win, T15, T22, T3, T2, 2, T6, T4, T4. Since 2005, he has come in the top 6 every year! That's unheard of. Tiger playing well at the Masters has become as sure an event as any in golf, even as he has played poorly.

Want me to read off Phil's finishes since 1999? T6, T7, 3, 3, 3, win, 10, win, T24, T5, T5, win, T27. Pretty much a sure thing there too.

What does that say about the rest of the field if Tiger and Phil are guaranteed a top 5 or a win? I guess they need to step their game up.

Those are pretty good.

But how is this for a series of finishes in a major:

3  2  T12  1  2  T2  6  1  T5  2  4  3  T3  T2  2  1 T2  T4 .  18 years with only one finish out of the top 10 and 2 finishes out of the top 5.  That is Jack Nicklaus's record in the British Open from 1963 through 1980.   Pretty remarkable stuff and on a rota of courses.  Was the British Open too easy for Jack?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by turtleback

Those are pretty good.

But how is this for a series of finishes in a major:

3  2  T12  1  2  T2  6  1  T5  2  4  3  T3  T2  2  1 T2  T4.  18 years with only one finish out of the top 10 and 2 finishes out of the top 5.  That is Jack Nicklaus's record in the British Open from 1963 through 1980.   Pretty remarkable stuff and on a rota of courses.  Was the British Open too easy for Jack?


It's fitting that Jack's record at The British Open would be re-introduced into this discussion since I made a similar reference during a bit of dialogue that went on to inspire the OP to create this awesome thread.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

What have other players got to do with this? You just posted (quite a few times) about Tiger's "71 PGA Tour wins and 14 Majors". That's all that matters in this discussion. Post it a million times over and it doesn't change the fact that the path he's on RIGHT NOW seems a bit off - by his own standards. Tiger Woods is a professional athlete who is not playing to his previous level of greatness. How much higher that level is/was than his peers - thanks for the stats btw - just illustrates how far down he's fallen. He's still ranked higher than all but 7 other golfers on the planet, so nobody's saying he's terrible by any standard, but if you can look at it objectively, do you honestly believe he's on the right path to recapturing his previous magic? With Foley?

Sure Brandel Chamblee seems to be obssessed with Tiger's descent, but come on man, could you possibly be any more ossessed with defending Tiger? Forget about rebuilds, injuries, personal problems. Read the review of Foley's instructional video (on this site) and tell me he wouldn't be better off switching it up a bit further and dumping that poser.


Quote:

Augusta is a batting practice fastball for Tiger, just like it was for Jack (and it could be argued like the British Open was for Jack and Tom Watson). They competed there regardless of how their games were because of their course knowledge and how well those events suit their games. They're built for Augusta National.

I hope Tiger comes back because golf is more interesting when he's around, but if Sean Foley is the guy to do it, I'll be shocked. Time will tell.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

What I'm saying is that Tiger's C at Augusta is the equivalent of most qualifier's B+ game and his B game is as good or better than all but the top player's A+ game.

Augusta is to Tiger what Turnberry is to Tom Watson - comfort food. Tiger played fantastic at Augusta and he re-injured his knee. There's really not much more to say about Augusta (for me anyway) than that.




Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5029 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • If you own a Stack radar (for now, it's limited to Stack radar only), and want to work on your wedge game… it turns out that wedge distances are 99% correlated to ball speed. So, with a small radar, you can practice your wedge game easily in a gamified way.
    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...