Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've just started playing again after a few years off and I'm playing to a 10 handicap. I hope to get that back down to mid-single figures, which is where I was when I stopped before.

I'm currently playing with a set of Ping Eyes (the original, not even Ping Eye 2s!) that must be from the 70s or 80s!

Do you think I would benefit from upgrading to a more modern set? I'm talking in terms of distance, forgiveness and consistency?

Has anyone else been in a similar situation and upgraded? Are you better off for it?

Thanks


Posted

You would definitly benefit from a new set or Irons. In terms of distance you will most likely increase, but that all depends if you get the correct shaft, but in terms of forgiveness, you will be miles ahead of what you are playing now!

If you are on a tight budget here are a few suggestions:

Burner 1.0 for about 400 bucks

Callaway x-20 or x-22

Nike Ignite, Nike ignite 2.0, or Nike ignite 3.0 (I play the original Ignite from about 2006-07 and they are way above the 80s clubs i used to play, they are insanely good clubs)


Posted
You will almost certainly benefit by playing more modern clubs. The game improvement clubs are more forgiving and the game enhancement clubs feel fantastic. Shafts have come some way, too, I believe. One thing to be wary of when you mention distance: the Ping Eye PW has a loft of about 50 degrees, and your 9-iron about 45 degrees. Many sets marketed as distance now have the PW at 45 degrees (or less). So if you go to a demo day and try the TaylorMade Burner irons, and discover you're hitting your PW 10 yards past your current one, that's because it's a 9-iron stamped 'P'. Of course, if you hit it 20 yards past, 10 of those are technology (and you'll get an A-iron at 50 anyway).

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted



I'm going to be the lone dissenter here and say that as long as they have decent grips and fit your swing, why change? Maybe those irons fit you and maybe they don't, but with the right lofts, lies, and shafts Lee Westwood (PING staffer) could probably still break par with your sticks (even without new grips).

Get your swing checked out. Maybe new sticks are in order and maybe they aren't.

Quote:

I've just started playing again after a few years off and I'm playing to a 10 handicap. I hope to get that back down to mid-single figures, which is where I was when I stopped before.

I'm currently playing with a set of Ping Eyes (the original, not even Ping Eye 2s!) that must be from the 70s or 80s!

Do you think I would benefit from upgrading to a more modern set? I'm talking in terms of distance, forgiveness and consistency?

Has anyone else been in a similar situation and upgraded? Are you better off for it?

Thanks



  • Upvote 1

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

I'm going to be the lone dissenter here and say that as long as they have decent grips and fit your swing, why change? Maybe those irons fit you and maybe they don't, but with the right lofts, lies, and shafts Lee Westwood (PING staffer) could probably still break par with your sticks (even without new grips).

Get your swing checked out. Maybe new sticks are in order and maybe they aren't.


I think these are the old "cat eyes" and Lee Westwood could easily break par with them.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I agree with Sean, and to answer the second part of your post, I've bounced around using different iron sets for awhile and I feel that it has hurt my game. You have a good set of irons, I know people who prefer the original Eye to the Eye 2, and if they fit you they won't hold you back from improving.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm sure you'd hit it longer. Off center hits would probably carry longer also. Whether you'd gain anything score wise? Who knows. People used to shoot low rounds in the 70s and 80s too so.



Go demo some stuff, see if you like it.

nickent.gif4DX Evolver Driver, ping.gif Rapture 3 Wood, taylormade.gif Burner 08 5 Wood, nickent.gif 3DX RC 3-4 & 5DX 5 Hybrid,
nickent.gif 6-PW 3DX Hybrid Irons, cleveland.gif High Bore 09 GW-SW, touredge.gif 60* Wedge, maxfli.gif Revolution Blade Insert Putter
 
Yes I'm Aware That's 16 Clubs!

Posted

Ok thanks for the input guys.

I do quite like them and feel pretty comfortable with them so maybe I'll hold fire on upgrading. Might demo some irons some time in the future and see what they're like.

I wouldn't expect a new set to dramatically improve my scores but if the odd off centre strike goes a bit straighter and longer and I'm gaining 10 yards (in addition to the change in loft as per Shindig's post) on a pure strike then it's got to be a positive.

Definitely something to think about anyway.

Cheers


Note: This thread is 5348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.