Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6313 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anyone out there still using the original 588 wedges?? I noticed on clevelands web site... where about 50% of their pros are still using these wedges... my question would be .. if you were going to get one would you still get in chrome or gunmetal.. I think a lot of the cleveland guys believe it or not are still using mostly the chrome versions

Posted
I found my set of 588 wedges at a store closeout sale on the used rack at 60% off so I might've went a little crazy and got 3. My gap (49*) and lob (60*) wedges are chrome but my sand (54*) is the unfinished Raw Tour Grind.

There's no difference in performance or feel to me. I love all of them but the RTG with the rusty finish looks the coolest. It just stands out in my bag (which makes a little faster to find too when playing ready golf).

I made my selections based on the condition of the clubs available, but if I was buying new I would go with the RTG or gunmetal simply based on looks.

I found this article to be helpful: http://thesandtrap.com/bag_drop/is_rust_a_must/
In my bag:
Driver: F-Speed 10.5*
Woods: 3 & 5 Rescue Fairway
Hybrid: HiBore Hybrid 4i
Irons: SS-I 5-PW Wedges: Tour Action Reg. 588: 49*, 53*, 60*Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: Bridgestone e6

Posted
The 588 is one of my favorite wedge designs, I believe a lot of clevelands competitors base their designs off of the 588 but that is just an opinion of mine. As far as the tour guys and gals that Cleveland has that play this design many of them do not need the aid of the gunmetal finish to increase their spin espically with the way ball manufacturers are able to make the balls create such high ammounts of spin. If you look I would say that the percentage of women players playing RTG or Gunmetal would be slightly higher than the percentage of the male players that they have on staff. Though this may not be true due to the fact that the greens women hit to on the LPGA tour are not quite as firm and a little slower on the stemp than those on the PGA Tour.

Zebra

Titleist 910 D2 10.5 Aldila RIP Phenom

Callaway RAZR fit 3 wood Avixcore 69 series

Mizuno MP650 19* hybrid

Scratch SB-1 DS 4-PW R+ C-Taper

Scratch 1018 DS 53 & 60

Low Tide Fin 

3UP 3F12


Posted
I play the 588 GM in 51 and 56 deg. I've always played the 588 since started (Chrome) then got the RTG..but just liked the finish on the GM the best. I agree that the 588 is a fantastic wedge and still hard to beat. I was looking at the CMM/CG10 but the 588 is just so perfect. A timeless, clean and perfect design.

Posted
I would highly recommend these wedges...but, things to think about...

1 - The gunmetal (my choice) will have better/softer feel, but won't last as long due to the finish wearing

2 - You never know how long they will keep making these...so if you decide to go with them and fall in love with say, the gunmetal, you may have trouble finding them in the future.

3 - The CG10 is a solid wedge, the black pearl gives the same feel as the 588...that would be what I would go for if I were you.
Ping i15 8.5 Stock Stiff
Titleist 906F2 13* w/UST V2 FW 92g X

Titleist AP2 3-GW (KBS Tour)
Cleveland CG14 Black Pearl (56/60)

Titleist Cameron Futura 34" & Titleist ProV1x

Posted
I actually use the 588 56 and 60 degree tour action in gun metal. Looks really nice. Plays very good good too. got the 56 as a gift and bought the 60 for next to nothing. changed the grip and was good to go.

In My Callaway Golf Bag:

Driver: BB 454 8* Aldila nv65s
Fairway Wood: 3&5 Sport Stiff
Hybrid: Nicklaus 21* Himax4- PW: GT2 Tightlies StiffSW: 588 GunLW: 588 GunPutter: OZ T100Bite Men's Golf AC II Golf Shoe Top Flite ballGrey Goose Mini's


Posted
I play the 53 and 60 588's in Gunmetal and from I can tell so far, they'll last as long as you allow them to based on how well you take care of them. I've always made a point of cleaning all of the clubs after every round, but these clubs specifically need to be washed and then dried throuroughly . For me this has kept them in great shape and while rust is cool and all, it's really not neccesary with these wedges as the finish itself frames the ball with a dark bakground and there's virtually no glare at all.

Just for some comparison, I had CG11's earlier last season, the CMM material wears substancially faster than what's used in the 588. While I did notice a slight difference in feel, it wasn't anything that would have me leaning one way versus the other. Also, I'd be suprised if they were to stop making these wedges, they still get tons of play on akll the tours as well as out on the public and private courses. I'm not completely convinced this CMM platform they've been marketing at Cleveland is going to be overly successful (certainly hasn't been so far) and you may see another change in the near future; the only constant has been the classic wedges like the 588 and 900 series.

-Mike
In My Bag:

Taylormade: Superquad 9.5 Aldila VS Proto 'By You' 70-S
Sonartec: SS-07 14.0 Aldila NV 85-S
Cleveland: Halo, 3i UST Irod 83-SPing: i-10 4-UW AWT-STitleist: Vokey Design Spin Milled 54.10 & 60.08Slighter: Handstamped Tacoma, 350G in Black Satin w/Sound Slot

Posted
i have been playing 588's for close to a dozen years, the 53 in chrome (rtg was not available yet), and 60* in rtg. i love these wedges, they are definitely "go to" clubs. i have looked at other wedges, vokey, callaway and other cleveland models, but the 588's are the classic wedge as far as i am concerned. just a note on a previous post, callaway's new wedges look and perform so well because they are being designed by roger cleveland, in case you were wondering.

in the bag:
driver-titleist D2 10.5* w/aldila nv shaft
3-adams speedline fast 10 w/aldila shaft
hybrid-titleist 585 17* w/aldila shaft
irons-titleist 735cm w/ttdg s-300 shafts

wedges-cleveland 588, 53* and 60* w/ttdg shafts

putter-scotty circa 62 #1, gun metal finish

ball-pro v1

shoe-dryjoys


  • 1 year later...
Posted
Need help determining the degree of loft.
I have come across a Cleveland SandWedge. The only words say. REG. 588 Tour Action. It does not have anywhere a loft number. So I will assume it is 56* Any ideas?
No the number is not rubbed off. It is not there. The club is old, has that copper rust look. What do you guys think?

Posted
I still own and use my Gun Metal 588 wedges in 53, 56 and 60 degrees. I love the soft feel and the reliability and consistincy in each of my shots. I hesitate to look at new irons but as the grooves get worn down...I'm thinking of new wedges in the next few seasons. I will although probably go with a wedge that looks and feels like the 588 if I change models.
Je joue au golf, et j'aime ca.
-------------------------------------
Nike SasQuatch Sumo2
HaLo 2i & 3i
3100 I/H 5-GW588 Gunmetal 53/56/60White Hot XG #2Vector BagProV1x

Posted
i just bought a 64* gunmetal wedge the other day used for 35 bucks and i love it. i'm sure a brand new one may offer more spin but for 35 bucks its in excellent condition and has improved my chipping.

in my cart bag

Hi-Bore XL 9.5* stiff flex
Sport Series 19* 5 wood
Sport Series 15* 3 wood HBT Irons PW-3H Reg. 588 64*


Posted
I hate them. I think they feel 'hollow' and I highly doubt the pro's use the same wedge we pay $50 for or whatever it is. I also think the 588's have way too much bounce on them.

You get what you pay for and although I never thought I could tell the difference between cast and forged wedges, the 588 made that possible for me.

588 has scared me enough against cast wedges that I am worried I may not even like the vokey's which are cast...Can anyone compare vokey's vs. 588? Who knows? Maybe I got a bad 588 I just HATE the feel.
G5,9
F-50,13.5
MP33(2-9)
200,48.06
SM,54.11MP-T,60.05Anser 2

Posted
I've got a 588 DSG RTG+ 60 degree and love it. My first wedge not included in a set.

In my Datrek Rage bag:
Driver: Sumo 5000 w/ Aldila VS Proto Stiff
4-Wood: SasQuatch 2 w/ Diamana Stiff
Irons: AP2 4-PW w/ PX 6.0
Wedges: Zodia US Spec 52*, Yururi Gekku 57*, 588 DSG RTG+Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Style 3.5 or Odyssey White Hot Tour #1Ball: ProV1 or whatever I find!


Note: This thread is 6313 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.