Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am getting back into the game of golf, after many years away from the game. I was around a 10-12 handicap back then. Right now I am playing to about 16 handicap. I currently play the Cleveland TA3's, with stiff shafts. They are still pretty good clubs, but I am just not consistent with them. I know that the technology has changed alot in the last 5 years, and am looking to upgrade. I really like the Taylor Mades, and am asking for some feedback about the Burner 1.0 or Burner Plus. I am also open other recommendations. But don't want to spend alot of dough!

Phillip


Posted
I'm not a fan of TaylorMade's clubs, but I have what I believe is good advice that I (and a few others) give to everyone who is getting new irons, especially after some down time: 1. Get fit for them. Most companies do this for free. If you're getting TM irons, check their website for demo or fitting days. They'll fit you for loft lie length and flex for free, and ordering special on these is the same cost as buying off the shelf. You may think you aren't good enough for custom fit irons, but the fact of the matter is you aren't good enough to NOT have custom fit irons. Grip size is typically fit as well, and rarely has an additional cost (unless you have an odd consideration, like jumbo grips -- which are very worth it if you need them, I hear). 2. Get the ones you want. I don't just mean the brand, but if you aren't going to ever put a 4-iron in the bag, don't buy it. Order 5-A, and that'll be 7/8 of the cost of a set (and you get 7 irons instead of 8). Use the money you save towards a hybrid (if you're omitting from the top of the set) or a wedge (if you're leaving out from the bottom). 3. You can mix sets if you're so inclined, but both sets you're looking at are more or less in the same category, so I'll skip this unless you want to hear more. 4. Don't be seduced by new distance. Your lack of consistency is a good reason for a new set, as are the changes in technology. Sometimes people come back from a layoff and hit a 7-iron from a new set and it's 10 yards past their old one -- and has the loft of their old 6-iron. Just something to be aware of when shopping sets.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I played the Burner 1.0s for about four months in 2009. They were super easy to hit and extremely forgiving (to the point of concealing mishits). They're lofted about a full club strong. I ended up replacing them with my current TPs when I got fitted because I wanted something with a thinner look at address that would force me to work on my ball striking.

If you don't mind the look of a full GI iron, the Burners would be a great option. I highly doubt someone at your level would like a SGI set like the Burner Plus. Given your desire to keep costs down, I would recommend checking out the TPs. They can be had for $400 something new on eBay.


Posted

I will definately get fitted for them. My old TA3's were fitted for me as well. The only thing that was tweaked on the TA3's was the lie and shaft. I am a little older and just a little slower but I know my game is still there somewhere. I just need help finding the clubs that will get me back to my glory days of shooting 80's and 81's consistently! LOL! Like I said the TA3's were good clubs, but you have to be on your A game week in and week out to score and that was my problem then and that is my problem now.

Thanks for your help guys!

Phillip


Note: This thread is 5406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.