Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DFerlmann

Cleveland cg16 tour irons

Note: This thread is 2409 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

4 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

Right now i am demoing the 7 iron to the Cleveland cg16 tour set, and i have to say i really like it. if anyone has the whole set or also has demoed it please let me know what you thought of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

I just went through the process of buying irons . I really wanted the Clevelands but didnt like the feel and had poor swing results . I also tried ap2`s mp 53`s . my last choice going into this were Ping s-56`s because my golf partner has them . but after all the testing was done side by side the Ping`s won . ymmv Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got to hit a couple of the irons at a Golf Expo last January.

Although I'm not the best ballstriker in the world, I hit them pretty well. The CG16 Tours and the Callaway X20 Tours (which I had bought on CalPreO) both flew pretty well.

16 Tours more user-friendly than Ping i10 and i15, and the Titleist AP2 variants. Also, 16 Tours have slightly higher lofts than some comparable clubs, so you get the ball up a bit better, and you  won't need five wedges to cover distance gaps at the short end.

If you have a single-digit HDCP and like them, give CG16 Tours a shot - just make sure you get the shaft that's right for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2409 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • Agreed. It depends what you value, how you derive worth. If you take the economic concept of utils (a unit of happiness/joy/satisfaction) - and having PXG provides you with 3x more utils than a $1000 set of clubs (plus spending the remaining 2k on other things) then it is worth it . Utils don't only come from 'better golf' or 'lower scores'. For me - I derive very few utils from cars, I just don't get it. My wife and I drive a basic, very high value car. I get my utils from reliability, value for money, that is says something about me (frugal, sensible). My best friend loves cars, and gets his utils from european styling, luxury etc. My pushbike costs about 6x what he does. We are both better off me having a cheap car and an expensive bike and him vice versa. This is why you can't argue with what other people value - it is deeply subjective, not rational.
    • I have been super busy renovating a house I recently bought, so I haven't been following golf closely, and I'm very late to the party on this one.  My opinions have probably already been stated many times because they seem fairly standard and obvious to me, but I'll chime in anyway. First, I'm very surprised at the level of animosity against Phil.  Talk about "What have you done for me lately?," here's a guy who has spent the last 25+ years doing his best to be as gracious to fans as he could, probably the best since Arnie, and yet he has one brain fart and the knives are out.  I know all about FIGJAM and Phony Phil, but you HAVE to be phony to be nice to the galleries, because they are full of idiots.  Don't get me wrong, I'm one of them, and most of us are respectful of the players and the game, but even if it's only 10% that are loud and obnoxious, that's thousands at any one event, and the fact they are the loudest and pushiest triples their impact.  Seriously, if he smiles and chats and signs autographs for an hour when he'd rather be relaxing somewhere, I guess technically that's phony, but in a good way, so what's wrong with it?  I mean, how many people would actually prefer to hang around a bunch of half-drunk morons than go home to their wives? I'm also aware that there are many people who have nothing against Phil, but still think he should have been DQd.  And I'm one of them.  I like him, I like the way he tries to be fan friendly, and I don't care about his personal life -- and even if I did, I haven't heard much bad about him, other than his ego, as if being arguably the second best golfer of his generation, especially when that generation (IMO) includes the GOAT, shouldn't inflate his ego. But when I say he should have been DQd, I mean in a perfect world, which this obviously isn't, because golf rules are often stupid.  In this situation, the rule was properly applied, so he didn't get DQd, but the rule is wrong.  Lots of the rules are wrong.   Up to a couple of years ago, you could get DQd for signing an incorrect score card, even when you had no idea it was incorrect.  The USGA and R&A thought that deserved a DQ, but deliberately hitting a moving ball didn't.  It's crazy. People say he gained an advantage from his action.  Well, duh.  I've seen guys who hit a poor approach, got an absolutely dead lie, but then got a free drop because a TV cable was nearby.  Then they got another free drop because the bleachers were in the way.  Then they got another free drop because of a sprinkler head.  And by the time they were done, they went from being in the rough in a horrible lie to being on the fringe, or even on the green.  Talk about gaining an advantage. And the rules official was directing them every step of the way.  I repeat, it's crazy. This is a golden opportunity for them to change the rule.  Deliberately hit a moving ball, DQ.  Very simple.
    • The player can choose to call his ball unplayable in any circumstance.  He is the only judge of this.  In the case you mention here he was taking one of the water hazard options, rather than an unplayable lie.  One could decide his ball sitting right next to the hole is unplayable, and go back to where he hit previously, at the cost a stroke.  Of course, he could be rightfully called a sandbagger, at that point!
    • Yes.  I welcome the challenge.  I'll pick appropriate tees and do my best.  I am going to play a Pete Dye course on my birthday this year, although it isn't necessarily among the toughest of his courses (and it'll be my fourth time playing that particular course). 
    • Day 20 - 50 practice chip shots (stance, swing, target), then a half hour of putting, then a small bucket at the range (30-35 balls, an hour) working on half swings, punch shots, and my old priority piece (I have a new evolvr lesson in, but I don't want to work on it until Saturday because I'm playing tomorrow & Friday)... and of course some drives and full wedges.  I finished up with another 15 minutes of putting. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. magnolia
      magnolia
      (26 years old)
    2. masoshe21
      masoshe21
      (22 years old)
    3. mp33man
      mp33man
      (32 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...