Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • iacas

      Snell 20% Off   11/24/2017

      TST Partner Snell Golf is having a 20% off Black Friday/Cyber Monday sale! Check it out at snellgolf.com.
Sign in to follow this  
DFerlmann

Cleveland cg16 tour irons

4 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

Right now i am demoing the 7 iron to the Cleveland cg16 tour set, and i have to say i really like it. if anyone has the whole set or also has demoed it please let me know what you thought of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I just went through the process of buying irons . I really wanted the Clevelands but didnt like the feel and had poor swing results . I also tried ap2`s mp 53`s . my last choice going into this were Ping s-56`s because my golf partner has them . but after all the testing was done side by side the Ping`s won . ymmv Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got to hit a couple of the irons at a Golf Expo last January.

Although I'm not the best ballstriker in the world, I hit them pretty well. The CG16 Tours and the Callaway X20 Tours (which I had bought on CalPreO) both flew pretty well.

16 Tours more user-friendly than Ping i10 and i15, and the Titleist AP2 variants. Also, 16 Tours have slightly higher lofts than some comparable clubs, so you get the ball up a bit better, and you  won't need five wedges to cover distance gaps at the short end.

If you have a single-digit HDCP and like them, give CG16 Tours a shot - just make sure you get the shaft that's right for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Lol, I like both those movies you hated. Loved? No, but I liked them. I also liked Vanilla Sky too in spite of its flaws. To each his own I guess, and perhaps therein lies the rub that's makes % ratings unreliable more often than not. Or maybe I'm just a sucker for Tom Cruise vanity projects.  But I agree that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't help much at all in determining whether I'll enjoy a movie or not. It's still interesting to browse though, just to see where the pulse of the American critic is, if little else.  I also agree that the discrepancy between critic and audience score is a fascinating one to see when it happens. That's a fun list on that link. Let's see... what are some "bad" movies that I still enjoyed... The 13th Floor (1999) was 29% but with a 67% audience score. A totally flawed movie overshadowed by the Matrix, but still a fun sci-fi journey i think with interesting ideas in it.  I enjoyed Seeking a Friend for the End of the World (2012) that is 55% critic and 53% audience. I dunno, I thought it was a nice story... plus the Writer-Director lady is from the same town as me in NJ, so I always found that interesting that we grew up drinking the same water.  I've always loved the Cable Guy (1996) which is 54%, 51% respectively. Man, people really hated this movie when it came out, but I've always found it hilarious.  I thought Primer (2004) was an ambitious and cool sci-fi movie made on a shoestring budget. I'm not sure how it has only 72% from the critics given what they accomplished on a per dollar scale. Cool story that no doubt has its flaws.  One recent movie that I quite enjoyed that was totally panned (and for good reason) was Passengers (2016). It currently stands at 30%, 63%. Perhaps its just its basic log line that I like, as the film itself kind of loses its way at times. I certainly wouldn't fault people for thinking it was boring or lame as its execution and linear script was pretty banal at times, I admit.  But this random Youtuber made a really cool video about how to make the script for Passengers better, and I 100% agree with his suggestions. This is a pretty cool video if you've seen the movie already. His version is way better.  I think if they took this guy's suggestions, that 30% critic score would be above 65%.   
    • I'm not sure if this is what he meant, but I think you can you use the "feel ain't real" to your advantage. Meaning, if the feel seems right but the results are wrong (or video shows it's wrong), you can exaggerate a move to the point where it feels wrong and it might closer. Example... if I feel my head is remaining stable but video shows I'm moving it towards the target as I get to the top of my backswing, I might change to the point where I feel like I'm moving back away from the target. On video, that feel produces a steadier head. Does that make sense? That's not to say that feel will always work. In fact, there's a good chance it will not. Edit: I didn't realize this is exactly what @klinekahad posted. (it's good to know I'm not the only one who has used that feel). Anyway, maybe that's what @Buckeyebowmanmeant with his response.
    • He's played with every president. That's remaining neutral. You either play with none of 'em or all of 'em.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. golf755
      golf755
      (28 years old)
    2. PaddyMac
      PaddyMac
      (48 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...