• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
motsco

Garmin Approach G5 Owners Check In

9 posts in this topic

Who's got one?  What are your pro's and con's?

Can you track stats?  Can you measure distance?  most of all is it accurate?

tom

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I have the G3, which is similar. I love it. It is quite accurate---always has been within a couple yards of yardage plates on the courses I've seen. The map coverage is fairly good and all the courses are free.  There is no provision for mapping points on an unsupported course, however.

The interface is pretty straightforward. You can touch the screen to get yardage to intermediate points on the course or to position the pin on the green.

It does measure shots, but they made an unfortunate choice to put this on a separate screen rather than in a corner of the main screen.  To measure a shot means taking it out of screen lock, going two menus away, then pressing reset.  When you've measured the shot, you then have to navigate back.  It doesn't take long, but it means some fiddling.

It uses AA batteries, which is a huge plus in my opinion. It means you can carry spares. You want to get some rechargables for sure---they aren't only rechargable, but last much longer in a high-drain device like this. It does add $30-$50 to the cost if you don't already have the charger, but I think it's worth it.

Mechanically it is extremely rugged and feels like it could survive a drop (not that I'm going to test that).

Stat-wise, the G3 can keep scores for up to 4 golfers. I don't use this much, but it's well-integrated, automatically detecting when you reach the next tee box and prompting for the scores at an appropriate time. I believe the G5 also tracks some other stats, like perhaps club distances, but I haven't used it.

One thing I like is that when you plug it in to your computer via USB, it shows up as a drive. You can drag files onto it and poke around---there's even a text file that lets you set a greeting message that shows up when it boots. This isn't necessary from a functionality perspective, but as a geek it's a nice touch.

The only other thing that annoys me is that sometimes it's tricky to get it into or out of screen lock.  If you forget, you can wind up with it navigating around in your pocket.  But all things considered, I love the device and I'm sure the G5 is great as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After I got my G5 last spring i gave my laser to my brother - didn't need it any more.  The G5 gives me all the info I need, including distances to ALL hazards, doglegs - even shows tree locations.  Nothing else is necessary.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The latest (October) software upgrade provides tracking for all types of things. You can measure each shot. When you get to the ball, tell it what club you hit. Over time it will learn what club you hit based on your current distance and tell you what club to play. It will track GIR, fairways hit, number of putts, scores for 4 people etc. Love mine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will never give up my G5. Garmin has produced an excellent product. Measurements are dead on with laser measurements 99 percent of the time ( always within a yard or two ), and it tracks all the stats I need it to. The user interface is simple... and the free course map updates are a nice touch. It will measure distances for each club, and calculate your average distance with each. I don't see any reason to buy anything else. Especially when you consider there is no monthly / annual fee. Best product available, in my opinion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a G3 and love it. I use Lithium instead of rechargeable batteries, but other than that I agree with above. It's dead-on accurate, extremely rugged, and very easy to use. I don't track stats with it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know what selecting the different battery types actualy does ? What does the G5 do differently if you have alkaline versus recharable versus lithium battery selected. I would assume power consumption is different but my experience is that most of the hand held gps units perform best with fresh batteries or in other words, maximum power. So if choosing one battery type over the other somehow decreased power consumption, you are also decreasing accuracy to some degree. I would rather replace more batteries and maintain accuracy then conserve power at the expense of accuracy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by R11driver

Anyone know what selecting the different battery types actualy does ? What does the G5 do differently if you have alkaline versus recharable versus lithium battery selected. I would assume power consumption is different but my experience is that most of the hand held gps units perform best with fresh batteries or in other words, maximum power. So if choosing one battery type over the other somehow decreased power consumption, you are also decreasing accuracy to some degree. I would rather replace more batteries and maintain accuracy then conserve power at the expense of accuracy.


The discharge curve (voltage versus remaining capacity) is different for different battery chemistries. IIRC, alkaline batteries steadily and fairly linearly decrease in voltage until they're spent, whereas NiMH rechargeables hold a fairly steady (but slightly lower) voltage until they're nearing empty, then drop off rapidly. Not sure about Lithium.

I believe setting the battery type is just used to calculate the battery life remaining display. It's possible that it makes other changes, since e.g., NiMH are able to provide higher current than alkalines, but I don't believe it does this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears to me it dims the display slightly when you've selected Alkaline as your battery type, which would make sense from a power conservation standpoint.

And FWIW, the (NiMH) rechargeable batteries I've found to perform best for all sorts of digital devices are Sanyo Eneloops.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I had a hard time doing the hip thing. What happened was starting the swing with the arms. Now I start my swing by literally attacking with my right shoulder to the ball and just ignoring the club, hands, arms. The effect is, the hip is pushed out of the way, it just has to anatomically, the right elbow comes in before the body and you get in a position where you can give it smack with the right side.  So yes for me it is a start with the upper body the thing that is said to be a nono.  Its really just an approach from the other side to clear the hips. Worth a try. I love it.
    • When you say with the right shoulder you mean staying connected with the hips though? Not rotating the uper body 1st right? I really struggle with the legs / knees doing what they're supposed to.
    • Ok. I think I made big progress now. I practised swinging with speed yesterday (without hitting the ball) and measuring club head speed. What I noticed is that rotating my hips and body faster did nothing for speed. But keeping my wrists and arms loose and do everything from there gave at least 10 mph more speed. Also I worked on my timing. I measured 80 with my 7 iron, and around 85 with my 5. Could not measure my driver at home though. Today at the range I hit the ball around 200-220 yards with my seven iron which is pretty insane compared to how far hit it before. I was doing this on hard practise mats though. So on the fairway this might be less. Also I used a lot of lag. So my 7 iron probably behaved more like 6 or even 5 iron. Ok. Now for the driver. I did some corrections to my hand position and stance. No slice anymore which of course makes the ball flight straighter and longer. I hit is pretty consistently 220 yards. Which is pretty interesting since this is NOT a lot of longer than I hit my 7 iron. I also tried my Hybrid (its like a 4 iron) but did only gain about 10m of distance and more much inconsistent shots. Now I took your advice and tried a 3 wood. Wow you were right. I hit the ball 240 yards.  Whats is all means to me that I could probably hit the driver 250 yards or more but at the moment I still have a swing problem with this. I should mention that I use a very cheap driver from a complete Wilson set (whole set around $300). Maybe my timing with arms and wirst are just wrong with the driver.  Could also be the driver itself. But I doubt it since I hit the 3 wood from the same Wilson set much longer it seems.
    • do the hipslide by attacking with right shoulder, some find it easier. Try it it also presses the hip away just passively. 
    • Hopefully won't get into trouble for bumping an older thread but this is awesome. I'm working on hipslide, infact I'm obsessed with hipslide. I'm a s&t player so the hipslide is key part of the process for me at the moment. Any of you high HC players onto any feelings that help you get this down?  Finding it so hard to nail. I'm a feeling player and the info the coach has given me all makes total sense but unless I can get a feeling to work towards its hit and miss.  Cheers. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (51 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (24 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (38 years old)
  • Blog Entries