Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Is this club technically 'illegal'

snails07

By snails07
in Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting

 Share
Note: This thread is 5109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

snails07 Newbie

snails07

Posted
Posted

Hey all, I recently got myself a new (secondhand) Cleveland 64 degree lob wedge that I am told is illegal and wouldn't be allowed to be used on tour, which obviously wouldn't be a problem for me. I'm told that 60 degrees is the biggest loft allowed to be used.

When I was in a few golf stores the other day there were no 64 degree wedges, the biggest was 60 degrees.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

Cheers


Shorty Super Member

Shorty

Posted
Posted

Phil Mickelson uses a 64 degree wedge.

Whoever told you that 60 degrees is the maximum knows nothing about golf.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


noefi13b Established Member

noefi13b

Posted
Posted

I'd wager that what makes it illegal has less to do with the loft and more to do with the grooves.

At the start of 2010 (or was it 09) box style grooves were banned on the pro tours.

For amatuers the ban doesn't come into effect for quite a few years yet so I wouldn't worry about it...

"Let the bears pay the bear tax I pay the Homer tax!"


ohiolefty Great Member

ohiolefty

Posted
Posted

The grooves are probably non-conforming. 64 is legal for play.

Current Gear Setup: Driver: TM R9 460, 9.5, Stiff - 3W: TM R9, 15, stiff - Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro Black, 18, stiff - Irons: Callaway X Forged 09, 3-PW, PX 5.5 - SW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 54.14 - LW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 60.12 - Putter: PING Redwood Anser, 33in.


  • Moderator
mvmac Incredible Member

mvmac

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by ohiolefty

The grooves are probably non-conforming. 64 is legal for play.



Yeah grooves are probably 2010 or earlier

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook! 
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My Facebook, Twitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1

Note: This thread is 5109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • ConorHealy
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By ConorHealy · Posted

      Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • iacas
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By iacas · Posted

      Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • M2R
      Mizuno Jpx One Driver & Fairway Woods

      By M2R · Posted

      I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • coachjimsc
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By coachjimsc · Posted

      Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • DeadMan
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By DeadMan · Posted

      Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept