Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Yes the advice pointed out my different posture one thing that confuses me is, that if I'm a 2 plane swinger then working on a steep shoulder plane would only make me come to the ball at a steeper angle right? Where as in my swing my shoulders provide the rotation and the arms the lift. I'm not completely 100% I'm right there but if someone could confirm one way or another that would be great.

I watched a seminar with Jim hardy last night, that kinda made things clearer, you see when i work on a steeper shoulder plane I'm just digging holes, is there something else i need to change in order to not do this, ie, less lift with the arms therefore changing my whole swing to one plane, isn't that a bit drastic?

I'm only trying to learn sorry if i'm sounding dismissive.


if youre coming in too steep then a great way to shallow out your angle of attack is to push your hips towards the target.  this has a way of lengthening the bottom of the swing and allowing the clubhead to come in on a shallower AoA.

as far as the shoulder angle, it needs to be steeper so that it can be closer to being perpendicular to the initial spine angle that you set up with.  this is the most efficient way to swing, so that youre swinging around a central pivot point and not introducing different angles into the equation.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


Originally Posted by DanielJTill

Yes the advice pointed out my different posture one thing that confuses me is, that if I'm a 2 plane swinger then working on a steep shoulder plane would only make me come to the ball at a steeper angle right? Where as in my swing my shoulders provide the rotation and the arms the lift. I'm not completely 100% I'm right there but if someone could confirm one way or another that would be great.

No, your instinct is correct over what some of us are advocating here. I'm changing you to a one-plane swing. If you don't want to do that, then yea, you should keep your flat shoulder turn and high hands.



Originally Posted by DanielJTill

I watched a seminar with Jim hardy last night, that kinda made things clearer, you see when i work on a steeper shoulder plane I'm just digging holes, is there something else i need to change in order to not do this, ie, less lift with the arms therefore changing my whole swing to one plane, isn't that a bit drastic?

I'm only trying to learn sorry if i'm sounding dismissive.

It's good to be skeptical.

And yes, there is one more fix here concerning your backswing. You can't keep lifting your arms when you change to a steeper shoulder turn. Essentially, the angle of the arms at the top of the backswing should match the angle of the shoulders, with less lifting of the arms.

The backswing works in three dimensions with a one-plane swing: back, up, and in. You need more in and less up. The hand path on the backswing of a one-plane swing should end when the hands are about 4 to 6 inches behind the right shoulder, not high above it. The right elbow is tucked more to the torso, not coming off of it and separating from the body. It won't be completely tucked, but it will be a lot closer to it. A drill that students often get to make this change is putting a tee under the right armpit and not letting it fall out on the backswing.

But you can certainly keep your two plane swing if you like. A lot of legends of the game have played this way. It's just that eventually you have to get back onto the plane on the downswing to hit the ball well and that can be difficult to do consistently. The legends of the game who use a two-plane swing have learned over time to make this work for them. Feel free to keep it if you like. A lot of ams use it and play well with it.

However I don't believe this is a drastic change for you. It's certainly a significant change, but it's not like you've been a two-plane swinger for twenty years here. But yea, if you want to keep the steeper shoulder turn, you'd have to have less lifting of the arms.

Here's a thread you should check out: Deep Hands Explained

But yea, your instinct is correct that there is another piece here involved with steeper shoulders. Going to a one-plane swing will take the steepness out of impact right now, assuming the golfer is also pushing his hips forward correctly on the downswing so the swing can maintain a shallow approach.

The regular pros who post here are teachers of a one-plane, centered pivot, which is why you'll tend to see more tips related to this than two-plane movements. A lot of people find the one-plane swing to be a more efficient way to play. Not everyone agrees on that.

One thing that I will say though is that a flatter shoulder turn makes it harder to stay centered. There is usually some inevitable head movement away from the target on the backswing when the shoulders turn on a flatter angle and that will bring a bit more of a timing element into the equation. You'd have to time the movement forward again on the downswing in an equal amount, and that too can lead to inconsistent contact.

Originally Posted by bruce

Wow,i'm really impressed JetFan1983 at how much time you put into helping somebody,thats great pointers your handing out.DanielJTill i would definitely take heed of what JetFan1983

is advising you about your shoulder angle.

I appreciate that, Bruce. What's kind of funny is I'm learning to be more minimalist with the tip giving. If you read some of the other posts I've made on other swing threads, I tended to go over-board with the information for the sake of the student being able to see "the big picture." I would give a handful of tips that all inter-related to each other and then went out of my way to explain how they worked together while at the same time pointing out the most important 1 or 2 tips they should focus on. Now I'm just omitting giving the 3 or 4 inter-related tips and just giving the 1 or 2 that I think to be important. I'm not always right, but hopefully, the more I do this, the better I get at it. This stuff is fun for me. I'm sure the rest of you guys on the thread will agree that it's fun to participate in My Swing Threads.

I'm disappointed in myself when I give bad tips, but at the same time, I'm grateful to learn the correct information when it arises so I don't make that mistake again.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great response jetfan, thanks for clearing that up, still in two minds of whether to change or not, i know that having worked my swing up again after having lessons about 3 months ago (which did not help) if i make such a change it will mean another 2 or 3 months of practicing and frustration, 3 steps backwards to take 4 forward kind of thing. I'm not sure if i am ready for that right now, one thing i noticed today that i was taking my hands back way too much on the inside, causing some swings to go over the top. When i worked on taking the club back more n plane the finish of my back-swing was much higher with the hands and the ball striking was very consistent and at least 30 yards further at the range going 250 + (with range balls).

How would i go about taking the club back on plane with a shallow arm plane, that may sound confusing or obvious, but in my head it doesn't quite make sense. You may think just keep the arms on plane but the feeling i get when i do stay on plane is of the arms raising. Will the steeper shoulder turn steepen the arm swing therefore putting the club on plane, basically this new found feeling of plane will be discarded and i will have to find a new sense of on plane.

Sorry for the over use of the word PLANE




Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielJTill View Post

. . . I'm sure the rest of you guys on the thread will agree that it's fun to participate in My Swing Threads.

I agree wholeheartedly and I suspect we all learn a bit about our own swings (the good and the bad) reading about others'.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.



Originally Posted by DanielJTill

if i make such a change it will mean another 2 or 3 months of practicing and frustration, 3 steps backwards to take 4 forward kind of thing. I'm not sure if i am ready for that right now


I doubt it would take 2-3 months to make this change. True, any change takes longer without a good instructor to help you, but I doubt it takes 2-3 months. Honestly, you won't know how long a change will take to make until you try it.

If you want to see how it may work for you, just put a tee under your right armpit during your next range session and don't let it fall out during the backswing. Hit balls doing that and see what happens. Maybe film this and post it to discuss it.

Some people say that it feels like they are swinging their arms around their belt line when trying to get more hand depth and less lifting. The hands almost move inward immediately when you turn your shoulders steeper. It's important to note that the clubhead stays outside the hands when doing this. The forearms don't roll the clubhead behind them on the takeaway.

Again, if you don't like how it changes, that's fine too. Honestly, changes are hard to make without a teacher there for at least the first session to walk you through it. But it would be interesting to see you film yourself doing this drill and then hearing your observations of how it changed things for you, good and bad.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think thats a good idea, if i give it an honest try say hit 100 balls that way, i can then make a better decision, so is that all i need to do to change to a 1 plane? or have i got to make sure the shoulder angle is steeper, steeper than the second video of me with the s wedge? Also what would be the best club to practice this drill? Any other tips?

Well i am playing a round tomorrow and wont be at the range until sunday but will give it a try then.




Originally Posted by DanielJTill

I think thats a good idea, if i give it an honest try say hit 100 balls that way, i can then make a better decision, so is that all i need to do to change to a 1 plane?

Pretty much the only technical difference between a one plane and two plane swing is this: in a one plane swing, the angle of the arms at the top of the backswing matches the angle of the shoulders. In a two plane swing, these two angles do not match. Obviously, this brings more differences into play as a result of these two planes being different or the same, but when you boil it down, that's the literal difference.

One thing I will add though is that the right arm should not flex beyond 90 degrees on the backswing, and feeling a straight right arm going back can be a big power source. The reason I'm mentioning this is doing the tee-under-the-right-armpit drill may lead to over-flexing of the right arm. I probably don't need to mention this.


Originally Posted by DanielJTill

or have i got to make sure the shoulder angle is steeper, steeper than the second video of me with the s wedge? Also what would be the best club to practice this drill? Any other tips?

Well i am playing a round tomorrow and wont be at the range until sunday but will give it a try then.

I was just looking at your latest video and there is head movement away from the target on the backswing. Granted, you have a really good downswing for someone who hasn't been playing very long. Have you checked out the thread on the centered pivot yet? It relates to the steeper shoulders, and the other stuff we're talking about.

I'd probably start with a shorter iron, but it shouldn't really matter which club you choose.

Yea, give it a try during a practice session. Film the tee-under-the-right-armpit drill and note the changes in contact, divot depth, and ball flight, if any. Share your thoughts, good or bad, and post a clip.

And definitely just play your game during your upcoming round and don't think about this stuff . And in the end, you may find that you like the two-plane swing more. You'll just have to see.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

do some work with a mirror.  itll be easy to see if your arms match your shoulders.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • First, it is on free TV. NBC is free to anyone with an antenna, and is on almost any TV in the U.S. with a minimal amount of effort. Charging "a bargain price" would be incredibly dumb. They charged $750 and the event sold out almost immediately. You could better argue they should have charged MORE, not less. What happens if you charge less: ticket scalpers buy up even more of the tickets because they see value: if tickets were $250, they'd clearly have sold for $1k or more on the secondary market. That's tremendous value. Fans would end up paying the same or more, or just not being able to go. Sure, a few who happened to be online at the precise moment on a fast connection and didn't fumble with their credit cards might have gotten tickets for $250, but the secondary market and ticket brokers would have scooped up the vast majority with automated processes and bots and scripts, then re-sold them later on. This way, fans get to purchase the tickets, and the PGA is earning that revenue, not the secondary ticket brokers. Econ 101. Supply and Demand. Nope.
    • Edit - the link has no title, but basically Tiger wants $5 million for each US player to “donate to charity”   They could put the Ryder Cup on free to air tv, and charge the fans a bargain price to get in.  If you have to  give the players $60 million, that’s why the tickets are $750.   
    • Wordle 1,264 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟨🟩⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • P7TWs all day IMO. Especially because they're already fit for you. And it sounds like you have an interest in buying/selling so using the Vapor Pros would only decrease their value.  
    • Wordle 1,264 3/6 ⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...