Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4982 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's my issue.  I'm tall and have a previous set of clubs that I got fitted for (first set ever), and it's time for me to upgrade.  According to the charts I need an extra 1" on my irons.  My issue is the extra cost to get that extra inch.  The fitting is free, but I am limited to current models of clubs which are more expensive, and I can't order online.  Not ordering on online will cost me 10% in sales tax where I live and I can't use another 10% coupon code for online purchases.

Last week I used my friends Burner 2.0 irons and I loved they way they feel.  I currently have Nichalsons and they are OK.  It looks like the burners are a little longer than standard clubs and there wasnt much of a noticable difference in length when compared to my clubs.  So there might only be 1/2" difference between my current clubs.  I used them and it didn't affect my stance much at all and the lye appeared OK.

What do you guys think?  Especially you taller golfers?  I don't want to invest this money and have clubs for years that don't work correctly for me.


Posted

If you used clubs an inch shorter than you were fitted for and changed nothing else in your setup or swing, then the lie would be too flat for you and you would tend to push everything.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

If you used clubs an inch shorter than you were fitted for and changed nothing else in your setup or swing, then the lie would be too flat for you and you would tend to push everything.

Well I naturally probably had to bend slightly more over but not enough to notice.  Like when you grip an inch further down on a club you can usually still hit with your lye fine.


Posted
Originally Posted by henderson14

Here's my issue.  I'm tall and have a previous set of clubs that I got fitted for (first set ever), and it's time for me to upgrade.  According to the charts I need an extra 1" on my irons.  My issue is the extra cost to get that extra inch.  The fitting is free, but I am limited to current models of clubs which are more expensive, and I can't order online.  Not ordering on online will cost me 10% in sales tax where I live and I can't use another 10% coupon code for online purchases.

Last week I used my friends Burner 2.0 irons and I loved they way they feel.  I currently have Nichalsons and they are OK.  It looks like the burners are a little longer than standard clubs and there wasnt much of a noticable difference in length when compared to my clubs.  So there might only be 1/2" difference between my current clubs.  I used them and it didn't affect my stance much at all and the lye appeared OK.

What do you guys think?  Especially you taller golfers?  I don't want to invest this money and have clubs for years that don't work correctly for me.

Remember, you can order online and save the sales tax if the company you order from does not have a store in your state. Remember a lot of coupons do not cover any real brand name clubs either.

When I bought my irons, I ordered from Austads and was able to get them fitted (I had all of the info for them) - and no sales tax since they are located in one of those highly unpopulated states.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why don't you get fitted for clubs? Find out for sure.

If clubs are too short you would tend to hit the irons out on the toe.

If you got clubs from the factory, they would give you the extra length for minimal upgrade cost.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4982 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.