Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6790 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anybody out there got an opinion on replacing 3/4 irons with a 7 wood? Long irons are a bit patchy for me, so I'm thinking of buying a 7 wood to replace my 3 iron. I should get a much better higher trajectory with more consistency, particularly of the fairway. It just feels a bit like a kop out taking that route.

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
No one really plays 7-woods anymore, they have been replaced by hybrids.

In My Bag:
905T 9.5* w/Graffalloy Blue - D8
Maltby Trouble Out 13* 3+-Wood w/ Aldila NV - D4
HALO 1 Hybrid w/S400 Steel - D4
Maltby M-05 Forged 3-PW w/ Rifle 6.5 - D4 Vokey Oil Can 52* 56* 588 RTG DSG Bioniks Rl 209 Putter (400 grams) E5+


Posted
I play a 7 and a 9 wood. It was difficult for me at first since at the begining I only carried a driver. But once you start to scorethe ego thing goes away in a hurry. So I now carry a 3,7,9, and took out the 3. Don't care much for the look of the hybrids.

In My Bag: This week
Driver: Nike square Sumo 10.5
4-Wood: Nike square Sumo 14.5
7 wood Cleveland launcher,
5 utility 19* clevelandIrons: 4-7 Titleist 690mb 8-pw Mizuno MP 33Wedges: Gauge Design GAS II 52* and 58* Putter: Scotty Cameron TE 10 2.5TP Mills or Cameron's or Bettinardi's. let me...


Posted
Hybrids really have taken the place of the "short" woods in many people's bags. I still know people that carry through an 11 wood, though.

I have a 3/4 hybrid that I sometimes will swap with my 3/4 irons when I feel like trying to score well because I'm really more confident and consistent with them than I am with my 3/4 irons. I think it's a bit of a cop-out myself, though, so I try to play with my 3/4 irons as much as possible. I'm admittedly not as bent on lowering my score as I am on enjoying the game, and I'm MUCH prouder of a well-hit 3 or 4 iron than I am of a well-hit hybrid, even though it may cost me a stroke or two here or there. Now if I was playing for score or against someone, I might very well put those two hybrids back into the bag.

In the end, it's whatever makes you happy. Try out a couple hybrids, and a 7 wood and see what you like the most.

Posted
I'm young and I carry a 7 wood. I always have. It's funny though, I have a bunch of nice clubs and this one really crappy MacGregor 7 wood from 1994. It's all beat up and the cluib face literally has a chunk missing out of it, but it's my lucky club. I can hit it better than anything in my bag, so I can really justify taking it out. I still carry my 3 and 4 irons, and only really hit the 7 wood if I need to hit over something.
What I play:
Cleveland HiBore XLS 9.5 Fujikura Stiff flex | Titleist 735.cm Stainless Steel True Temper S300 3-PW | Titleist Vokey GW 52 | Cleveland 588 SW 56 | Titleist Vokey LW 60 | Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless | Titleist Pro V1x

Where I play:
Texas A&M UniversityHow I play:Goals for 2008

Posted
Can a 7 wood really replace a 3 or 4 Iron? When I hit my 3 Iron well it is going nearly as far / farther then a 5 wood...

I would go for hybrids if I were you, they are not as beautiful but much easier to hit from semi rough or even rough than a fairway wood.

The Ben Hogan Hybrids are very nice, from an asthetic point of view and the result.

WitB

R7 Superquad 10.5
R7 Steel 3 Fw
2 Iron Rescue Dual MP 60 3-PW Vokey SM 56.10 Vokey SM 60.08 White Hot XG # 9


Posted
Anybody out there got an opinion on replacing 3/4 irons with a 7 wood? Long irons are a bit patchy for me, so I'm thinking of buying a 7 wood to replace my 3 iron. I should get a much better higher trajectory with more consistency, particularly of the fairway. It just feels a bit like a kop out taking that route.

With a 28 handicap, there is no such thing as a "cop out" using a 7 wood or a hybrid. Both clubs are easier to use than a 3 or 4 iron. Many pros are using hybrids and, it just makes sense for high handicappers to give them a try. I added two hybrids to my bag this year, replacing my 3 wood and my 5 iron. I hope that information doesn't give purists the vapors. Those hybrids join my 4 iron replacement hybrid. But I have not replaced my 5 wood or my 7 wood. I hit those clubs too well to replace them. I love my 7 wood. There was a segment of "Curb Your Enthusiasm," the HBO TV series, in which a fellow was buried with his 5 wood. Now, I might not go that far, but I'm not willing to give it up as long as I'm still playing golf. So, you ask, "Should I get a 7 wood?" Well, why don't you go try some 7 woods and, maybe some of the equivalent loft hybrids. See what works for you. But if you're playing to a 28 handicap, you owe to yourself to try something easier to hit than a 3 iron. Good luck in your search.

shortgame85
In the Bag:
Driver: :TaylorMade: RBZ 9.5 Reg Flex
3 Wood :TaylorMade: RBZ Reg Flex
Hybrid: Ping G25 Hybrids 17*, 20*, 23*

Irons:Ping G25 5-Gap Wedge, Sr Flex, Vokey 56.14 Spin Mill NS Pro Reg, Flex

Putter: Bobby Grace Center Shaft 32"


Posted
It's funny though, I have a bunch of nice clubs and this one really crappy MacGregor 7 wood from 1994.

It's funny that you mention your lucky MacGregor 7-wood. I picked up a MacGregor 7-wood about 8 years ago at Oshman's Sporting Goods for around $50-$60. It was my most reliable club for years. It had a very shallow face and I could play it off just about any lie. Recently I have gotten more serious about golf and purchased all new clubs. I sold all my old clubs, including the MacGregor. I miss that club and really wish I hadn't gotten rid of it. I sold the clubs to a local Play It Again Sports, I may go back to the store and buy the club back if they still have it.

Driver: Launcher, 10.5°
Fairway: Big Bertha 2007, 15° & 18°
Hybrid: Rapture, 21° & 24°
Irons: Big Bertha 2006, 5 - PW
Wedges: Vokey, 52° & 56°Putter: White Hot XG, Rossie Ball: HX HotI'm not saying my golf game went bad, but if I grew tomatoes, they'd come up sliced. ~ Lee Trevino


Posted
Thank you all for taking time to reply. You are all gentlemen of the highest order!!!

Big Don

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
Anybody out there got an opinion on replacing 3/4 irons with a 7 wood? Long irons are a bit patchy for me, so I'm thinking of buying a 7 wood to replace my 3 iron. I should get a much better higher trajectory with more consistency, particularly of the fairway. It just feels a bit like a kop out taking that route.

Yes! In short, the 3/4 irons are hard to hit. Some people are replacing their 5-irons too. Between 7-9-11-13 woods and hybrids, find clubs that you like that fill the distance gaps formed by removing clubs that you don't hit well. And when you start hitting your 5- and 6-Irons well, bring your 4-Iron to the range, and if you start to like it better than its replacement, go ahead and swap it back in.

Some people love "short" woods, others love hybrids. Still others just love their irons, right down to the 2-Iron. Find what you love and what works for you, and go for it. It's not a cop-out. You're allowed 14 clubs *of your choosing* - them's the rules.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Coincidently, I just bought a 22 deg. 904F 7 wood on eBay this weekend. I have never enjoyed playing hybrids i.e. except from out of the rough and even then, its been primarily to 'punch' out.

As others have said, it really comes down to preference. I for one, prefer woods over hybrids.

Vancouver, BC CANADA

Driver: 905T 9.5 deg
Fairway Woods: 904F 15 & 19 deg.
Hybrid: FLI-HI CLK 21 deg.Irons: MP-60Wedges: Vokey 52/8, SM 56/14 & SM 60/4Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Design 1.5Bag: S64 StaffBall: NXT Tour


Note: This thread is 6790 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.