Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4895 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm in Myrtle Beach on vacation this week, and yesterday I was playing at the Wicked Stick golf club in Surfside.  At the Pro shop, I bought a brand new box of 20xi's for only $30.  Pro V1's were $58 a box. Penta's and Hex's were at $35 a box.  I have no clue why anyone would pay almost double for the same ball, but that's name recognition for you.  Anyways, I just wanted to know if anyone had any idea why this was?


Posted

Not sure about the Penta but the 20xi and Hex both have different versions, like the prov1 and v1x, could be disparity in those prices? Also, prov1 is just about a household name for balls now, they're way marketed and can charge whatever they want it seems. The others (not penta, dont know anything about them) are newer more gimmick balls imo. 20xi with new rubber core and Hex pattern dimples... reaching for their own market with "newest great technology".


Posted

Even at 58 bucks, I find lost ProV1s and ProV1x's more often than I find any other ball on the course. I've never found a Bridgestone B330 or B330s, or even a Penta.

Driver: :tmade: R11 9.0 - Bassara Griffin UL - Tour Stiff 3-wood: :tmade: R11 Ti 15.0 - JAVLNFX M6 - Stiff Hybrid: :tmade: Rescue Hybrid - JAVLNFX Hybrid - Stiff 4-PW: :mizuno: JPX 800 PRO - Nippon 1150 GH Tour - Stiff Wedges: :edel: 50/56/60 - Nippon WV 125 Putter/Ball/RF: :edel: / :bridgestone: B330 / :leupold: GX-3i


Posted
I think the 20xi usually goes for about $26-30. It's Nike's upper-level ball, but it doesn't have the same brand recognition that the Taylormade's and Titleist's do. Never played it, so no idea how it performs or compares to other top-level balls.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
Originally Posted by B-Con

I think the 20xi usually goes for about $26-30. It's Nike's upper-level ball, but it doesn't have the same brand recognition that the Taylormade's and Titleist's do.

Never played it, so no idea how it performs or compares to other top-level balls.

They are usually listed around the same price as the other tour balls ( ~$45), but I've seen them on sale a lot. They must not be selling well.


Posted

Golf Digest stated that ALL of Nike's staffers are using them.  I didnt think they had a choice if they are contracted to play a certain brand.

Here in FL, United States, they are $45-$48 a dozen, the same as Pro V1's and Penta's, however the Nike's and Penta's are constantly having buy 2 get 1 free sales, essesntially knocking the price down to $30 or so per dozen.

So for close to half the price, as a 7 handicapper, I have been and will continue to play Nike's.

I'm kind of a power player so I usually lose at least one ball per round, maybe 2 or 3, and fortunatly my lost ball count is not definitve on how I score so I dont care, it would just get expensive playing $4 Pro V1's.

Also, the Pro V1's dont seem to last for me, after 9 holes they look like they've been sitting at the bottom of a lake for 2 years.


Posted
Originally Posted by blue72ss

Also, the Pro V1's dont seem to last for me, after 9 holes they look like they've been sitting at the bottom of a lake for 2 years.

or been ran through a meat grinder in my case. pro v  balls just wear down soooo fast, heaven forbid you catch a cart path, that's another $4....


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Originally Posted by Chris Shades

The 20xi is a terrible ball IMHO. There are less then a handful of Nike Staffers even using them.

I currently play the Nike Tour D ball that 1/2 the Nike players play.  I have a stock pile at home so I can play them for another year for sure.

I decided to play 9 holes with the new 20XI-X ball that the other 1/2 of the Nike players play.  The knock on the ball is a clicky feel on some shots.  I did experience it to a certain degree.  My distances were essential unchanged on wedge, iron, and driver.  However, I noticed a significant decrease in spin with my driver.  I'll probably stock up on the 20XI-X's without reservation.

I'll play my Tour D balls until they run out, but the new ball will come out early on windy days especially.


Posted
Originally Posted by Chris Shades

The 20xi is a terrible ball IMHO. There are less then a handful of Nike Staffers even using them.

The 20XI-X was not a good ball for me, not even close to the Tour/Tour D and no where near the Pro V1 X. I was given 4 dozen from a Nike Staffer and can see why they were given to me (I gave 2 dozen away). They are definitely a hard ball that I had a hard time compressing them with my 105 mph swing speed (driver). They were fine off the driver, hard from the irons, spun fine from the wedges, but just lacked feel. They were clicky and hard off the putter but rolled true. There are a lot of Nike staffers that are not playing this ball and really playing the previous generation. I don't know how hard you have to swing to really feel like you are compressing it, but I wouldn't recommend it for anyone that is under 115 mph (driver).

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I hated both of the 20XI's. They felt like top flites with weird covers on them. If I'm paying good cash for a tour ball, I'm buying some Callaway tour i(s) or Srixon Z-Stars.


Posted

Just found a Penta last week up at Crystal Mountain, apparently a sponsor ball as it had a logo on it.  Tried it for a couple of holes but preferred my Z-Star for which I paid $24 bucks this spring. (I think they were the 2010 or 2011 ball) I think the new Zstar came out this year.


Posted

Hmmm... I got a pretty good deal on some 20XI's a few weeks ago and bought 3 dozen for $75. So far, I actually like them quite a bit, but not enough to justify the extra cash compared to my normal Gamer V2. Golfsmith had the MacGregor premium ball (the VIP, 3 piece urethane cover) on sale for $12/dz so I'm gonna check those out next.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hit the Titleist nxt most of the time.I tried the prov1x but found I lost 5 to10 yds. on shots. I have hit the Penta and liked them too. Hit a few Srixon, but they were to hard to find .......


Posted
Originally Posted by TourSpoon

The 20XI-X was not a good ball for me, not even close to the Tour/Tour D and no where near the Pro V1 X. I was given 4 dozen from a Nike Staffer and can see why they were given to me (I gave 2 dozen away). They are definitely a hard ball that I had a hard time compressing them with my 105 mph swing speed (driver). They were fine off the driver, hard from the irons, spun fine from the wedges, but just lacked feel. They were clicky and hard off the putter but rolled true. There are a lot of Nike staffers that are not playing this ball and really playing the previous generation. I don't know how hard you have to swing to really feel like you are compressing it, but I wouldn't recommend it for anyone that is under 115 mph (driver).

I guess 9 holes of golf is not sufficient enough to determine if you like a ball or not.  I tried playing with the 20XI-X ball again and I was not impressed.  I was really really disappointed.  I've been playing the Nike One Black and Tour D ball since they came out close to a decade ago.  I don't know why Nike wanted to ruin a good thing by changing their ball so drastically.

I have a stock pile of Tour D's at the house (around 12 boxes), but I'll have to search for another ball I can stick with the long haul.  I had already accumulated 9 boxes of the 20XI-X ball, and luckily the local golf shop let me swap them out for 9 boxes of the Bridgestone B330 ball.  I heard they were the ones that actually made the Tour D ball I'm using now anyways.


Note: This thread is 4895 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.